Leveraging Regulatory Flexibility for Methadone Take-Home Dosing to Improve Retention in Treatment for Opioid Use Disorder

January 26, 2026 updated by: NYU Langone Health

Leveraging Regulatory Flexibility for Methadone Take-Home Dosing to Improve Retention in Treatment for Opioid Use Disorder: A Stepped-Wedge Randomized Trial to Facilitate Clinic Level Changes

Using a stepped-wedge randomized controlled trial, the study will test whether a clinic-level multidimensional intervention conducted in 36 opioid treatment programs (OTPs) will improve clinical decision making, regulatory confusion, legal liability concerns, capacity for clinical practice change, and financial barriers to take- home dosing (THD) for methadone as compared to treatment as usual.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Regulatory changes made during the COVID-19 public health emergency (PHE) that relaxed criteria for take- home dosing (THD) of methadone offer an opportunity to improve retention in care with a lifesaving treatment. Methadone is a highly effective medication for treating opioid use disorders (OUD) that is provided in opioid treatment programs (OTPs). Yet, longstanding regulatory restrictions limit the availability of methadone as well as create demands that heavily burden clients by requiring frequent visits to clinics. The rationale for these regulations is to safeguard against diversion and overdoses from methadone. Yet, the history and application of methadone regulations stem from stigmatized and racist notions of people with OUD. Most OTPs are located within communities with predominantly Black/African American or Latinx populations. Consequently, Black/African American and Latinx individuals have greater access to methadone than other, less restricted, medications for OUD. Within OTPs, Black/African American and Latinx individuals are less likely to receive adequate dosing levels of methadone and have lower retention than non-Hispanic White clients. More flexible THD may help address disparities in care. Currently, there is a national debate about balancing safety concerns over more flexible THD against the benefits of client retention and quality of life. Low offering of THD in many OTPs suggests a need for new data-driven interventions to encourage changes in engrained clinical workflows and long-standing stigmatizing beliefs about OUD clients. OTP leadership and staff express concern about misapplying regulatory flexibility, of iatrogenic effects of greater THD, and about legal liability from overdoses or diversion. Finally, financial concerns mount for organizations that have long based their business models on billing for frequent in-person medication dispensing. This project stems from a well-established academic-public partnership in New York State between the Office of Addiction Services and Supports (OASAS) and research collaborators from New York University, Cornell University, and the University of Connecticut. The investigators propose a two-part project to develop then test a multidimensional OTP intervention to address clinical decision making, regulatory confusion, legal liability concerns, capacity for clinical practice change, and financial barriers to THD. The intervention will include OTP THD specific dashboards drawn from multiple State databases. The approach will be informed by the Health Equity Implementation Framework. In year 1, the investigators will employ an explanatory sequential mixed method design to combine analysis of large state administrative databases-Medicaid, treatment registry, THD reporting-with qualitative interviews to refine the intervention. In years 2-5, the investigators will conduct a stepped-wedge trial with 36 OTPs (~10,800 Medicaid clients/yr) randomized to 6 cohorts of a six-month long clinic-level intervention over three years. The trial will test the effects of the intervention on 1) THD; 2) retention in care; and 3) adverse healthcare events. The investigators will specifically examine the effects of the intervention for Black/African American and Latinx clients.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

318

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Connecticut
      • Storrs, Connecticut, United States, 06268
        • Recruiting
        • University of Connecticut
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Megan O'Grady, Ph.D.
    • New York
      • Buffalo, New York, United States, 14260
        • Recruiting
        • University at Buffalo
      • New York, New York, United States, 10016
        • Recruiting
        • NYU Langone Health
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Charles Neighbors, PhD
      • New York, New York, United States, 10065
        • Recruiting
        • Weill Cornell Medical College
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Yuhua Bao

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Clinic staff inclusion will include anyone who works at the 10 clinics that the OASAS client data system generates from the quantitative analysis in year one. In years 2-5, clinics chosen by the OASAS client data system will be placed into six cohorts. Only staff from these clinics will be eligible.
  • Patient inclusion will include anyone aged 18 or older who has been receiving take-home methadone for at least 30 days.

Exclusion Criteria

• There are no exclusion criteria related to sex/gender to increase the generalizability of the findings. The investigators will note include children in this study because the treatment system that we are examining largely excludes adolescents and younger children.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Sequential Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Cohort 1
6 of the 36 recruited opioid treatment programs (OTPs) will be enrolled in group 1. Group 1 will start the six-month intervention at Baseline and end at Month 6.
The proximal goal of the intervention will be to increase OTP uptake of flexible THD. The intervention addresses facilitators and barriers to THD practices as identified by existing studies as well as those found during the first phase of the current project. The intervention will be designed to address the information gaps, training needs, and beliefs of individuals across the organizations.
Experimental: Cohort 2
6 of the 36 recruited opioid treatment programs (OTPs) will be enrolled in Cohort 2. Cohort 2 will start the six-month intervention at Month 6 and end at Month 12.
The proximal goal of the intervention will be to increase OTP uptake of flexible THD. The intervention addresses facilitators and barriers to THD practices as identified by existing studies as well as those found during the first phase of the current project. The intervention will be designed to address the information gaps, training needs, and beliefs of individuals across the organizations.
Experimental: Cohort 3
6 of the 36 recruited opioid treatment programs (OTPs) will be enrolled in Cohort 3. Cohort 3 will start the six-month intervention at Month 12 and end at Month 18.
The proximal goal of the intervention will be to increase OTP uptake of flexible THD. The intervention addresses facilitators and barriers to THD practices as identified by existing studies as well as those found during the first phase of the current project. The intervention will be designed to address the information gaps, training needs, and beliefs of individuals across the organizations.
Experimental: Cohort 4
6 of the 36 recruited opioid treatment programs (OTPs) will be enrolled in Cohort 4. Cohort 4 will start the six-month intervention at Month 18 and end at Month 24.
The proximal goal of the intervention will be to increase OTP uptake of flexible THD. The intervention addresses facilitators and barriers to THD practices as identified by existing studies as well as those found during the first phase of the current project. The intervention will be designed to address the information gaps, training needs, and beliefs of individuals across the organizations.
Experimental: Cohort 5
6 of the 36 recruited opioid treatment programs (OTPs) will be enrolled in Cohort 5. Cohort 5 will start the six-month intervention at Month 24 and end at Month 30.
The proximal goal of the intervention will be to increase OTP uptake of flexible THD. The intervention addresses facilitators and barriers to THD practices as identified by existing studies as well as those found during the first phase of the current project. The intervention will be designed to address the information gaps, training needs, and beliefs of individuals across the organizations.
Experimental: Cohort 6
6 of the 36 recruited opioid treatment programs (OTPs) will be enrolled in Cohort 5. Cohort 5 will start the six-month intervention at Month 30 and end at Month 36.
The proximal goal of the intervention will be to increase OTP uptake of flexible THD. The intervention addresses facilitators and barriers to THD practices as identified by existing studies as well as those found during the first phase of the current project. The intervention will be designed to address the information gaps, training needs, and beliefs of individuals across the organizations.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from Baseline in 7-Day THD Prescriptions
Time Frame: Pre-Intervention (from Baseline up to Month 30), Post-Intervention (from Month 6 up to Month 36)
7-day THD is defined as a prescription to pick up doses of methadone every 7 days or less often.
Pre-Intervention (from Baseline up to Month 30), Post-Intervention (from Month 6 up to Month 36)
Change from Baseline in 14-Day THD Prescriptions
Time Frame: Pre-Intervention (from Baseline up to Month 30), Post-Intervention (from Month 6 up to Month 36)
14-day THD is defined as a prescription to pick up doses of methadone every 14 days or less often.
Pre-Intervention (from Baseline up to Month 30), Post-Intervention (from Month 6 up to Month 36)
Change from Baseline in 28-Day THD Prescriptions
Time Frame: Pre-Intervention (from Baseline up to Month 30), Post-Intervention (from Month 6 up to Month 36)
28-day THD is defined as a prescription to pick up doses of methadone every 28 days or less often.
Pre-Intervention (from Baseline up to Month 30), Post-Intervention (from Month 6 up to Month 36)
Change from Baseline in OTP Care Retention
Time Frame: Pre-Intervention (from Baseline up to Month 30), Post-Intervention (from Month 6 up to Month 36)
Will be calculated only among patients who have been in treatment for less than 12 months at the start of the study.
Pre-Intervention (from Baseline up to Month 30), Post-Intervention (from Month 6 up to Month 36)
Change from Baseline in Number of Emergency Department Visits
Time Frame: Pre-Intervention (from Baseline up to Month 30), Post-Intervention (from Month 6 up to Month 36)
Pre-Intervention (from Baseline up to Month 30), Post-Intervention (from Month 6 up to Month 36)
Change from Baseline in Number of Hospitalizations
Time Frame: Pre-Intervention (from Baseline up to Month 30), Post-Intervention (from Month 6 up to Month 36)
Pre-Intervention (from Baseline up to Month 30), Post-Intervention (from Month 6 up to Month 36)
Change from Baseline in All-Cause Mortality
Time Frame: Pre-Intervention (from Baseline up to Month 30), Post-Intervention (from Month 6 up to Month 36)
All-Cause Mortality defined as death due to any cause.
Pre-Intervention (from Baseline up to Month 30), Post-Intervention (from Month 6 up to Month 36)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Charles Neighbors, PhD, NYU Langone Health

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 27, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

August 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

August 31, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 29, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 29, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

January 9, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 28, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 26, 2026

Last Verified

January 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Aggregate data will be reported to protect privacy of participants. Data will be shared upon reasonable request beginning 9 months and ending 36 months following article publication or as required by a condition of awards and agreements supporting the research provided the investigator who proposes to use the data executes a data use agreement with NYU Langone Health. Requests may be directed to: Charles.Neighbors@nyulangone.The protocol and statistical analysis plan will be made available on Clinicaltrials.gov only as required by federal regulation or as a condition of awards and agreements supporting the research.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Beginning 9 months and ending 36 months following article publication or as required by a condition of awards and agreements supporting the research.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

The investigator who proposes to use the data will be granted access upon reasonable request. Requests should be directed to Charles.Neighbors@nyulangone. To gain access, data requestors will need to sign a data access agreement.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Problems Related to Social Environment

Clinical Trials on Clinic-Level Multidimensional Intervention

Subscribe