NPWT vs Primary Closure in SSI Prevention for Emergency Laparotomies for Peritonitis (PRISTINE)

May 18, 2023 updated by: Medical University of Gdansk

Emergency Laparotomy for Peritonitis and Surgical Site Infection: Preventive Subcutaneous NPWT vs Primary Closure - a Randomized Health Services Study

The study aims to evaluate the efficacy of negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) compared with primary closure (PC) in surgical site infection (SSI) prevention for laparotomy for peritonitis.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Surgical site infection is a particularly common morbidity in contaminated surgeries leading to prolonged length of hospital stay, healing time, and a significant financial burden on healthcare systems.

Hence, the objective of PRISTINE trial is to compare the effectiveness of subcutaneous NPWT with PC for SSI prevention in patients who, due to wound contamination, are prone to infection. Moreover, with a further cost analysis, the investigators aim to evaluate the rationale for the implementation of routine preventive NPWT for laparotomy for diffuse peritonitis.

Patients qualified for an emergency laparotomy for peritonitis in University Clinical Centre (UCC) Division of Oncological, Endocrine and General Surgery will be identified. Prior to laparotomy, participants will be randomized in 1:1 ratio to subcutaneous NPWT or PC. The assigned intervention will be performed intraoperatively, after fascia closure.

All participants will receive an empirical antibiotic therapy regimen consisting of tazobactam/piperacillin or ciprofloxacin+ metronidazole. Participants will be followed-up postoperatively for one year.

In case of an SSI all participants, regardless of their initial allocation, will be treated according to the standard of care with prolonged NPWT and targeted antibiotic therapy.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

150

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Pomerania
      • Gdańsk, Pomerania, Poland, 80952

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • qualified for an emergency laparotomy for peritonitis
  • gave written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • qualified for open abdomen treatment

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: subcutaneous NPWT
The peritoneum and fascia will be closed as in the PC arm. Subsequently, patients will be treated with commercially available vacuum-assisted closure systems (provided by Smith&Nephew or Hartmann) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Following fascia closure, the NPWT foam will be adjusted to the wound size to fill the wound cavity without causing excessive wound dehiscence. Subsequently, the foam will be placed in the subcutaneous tissue. The foam will not be fixated on the skin with sutures. The wound will be sealed with adhesive film. In case of air leak in problematic areas such as the navel or ostomy, ostomy paste will be used to create a tighter seal. Continuous pressure of 120 mmHg will be applied. On the 3rd day postop, the dressing will be removed and closure by secondary intention will be performed.
Following fascia closure, NPWT system will be inserted into subcutaneous tissue, continuous negative pressure of 120 mmHg will be applied.
Other Names:
  • vacuum-assisted wound closure
  • Vivano
  • Renasys
No Intervention: primary closure
The peritoneum will be closed as a separate layer with a 2-0 multifilament absorbable suture. Subsequently, the fascia will be closed with a continuous suture using absorbable monofilament 0 sutures. Subcutaneous tissue will be rinsed twice with hypochlorite solution following peritoneal closure and fascial closure. Interrupted subcutaneous closure will be performed with absorbable multifilament 2-0 sutures. Following skin disinfection with an alcohol solution, the skin will be closed with non-absorbable monofilament 2-0 or 3-0 sutures using the interrupted mattress technique. Conventional Cosmopor® sterile gauze dressings will be applied. Unless the dressing material will be saturated, the dressing will remain unchanged until 3rd day post-op.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Effective wound closure by 30th day post-op
Time Frame: 30 days
definitive wound closure, not followed by secondary wound dehiscence
30 days
Time to end of surgical treatment of the wound
Time Frame: 1 year
Time of last out-patient visit ending the process of treating surgical wound
1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Length of stay
Time Frame: 90 days
postoperative length of hospital stay
90 days
Time to heal
Time Frame: 120 days
time to full epithelialisation of the wound
120 days
Volume of wound drainage
Time Frame: 60 days
Volume of wound drainage collected in a NPWT or drainage collector
60 days
Time of secondary NPWT treatment
Time Frame: 60 days
Duration of NPWT therapy administered if SSI occured
60 days
Post-operative morbidity
Time Frame: 60 days
occurrence of adverse events and complications following surgery measured with Clavien-Dindo scale (grade I to V; grade I represents any deviation from the normal post-operative course not requiring surgical, endoscopic or radiological intervention and grade 5 represents patient's death)
60 days
SSI presence or absence
Time Frame: 30 days

Surgical Site Infection according to Centre for Disease Control (CDC) criteria:

Infection occurring within the first 30 post-operative days with at least one of the following:

  • Purulent drainage from the incision
  • Organisms isolated from an aseptically obtained culture of fluid or tissue from the incision
  • Incision is deliberately opened by a surgeon AND at least one of the following signs/symptoms of infection:

    1. Pain or tenderness
    2. Localized swelling
    3. Redness
    4. Heat
  • Diagnosis of SSI by the surgeon or attending physician

Due to the inability to implement CDC for wounds treated with NPWT, the investigators have included additional SSI criteria: the absolute necessity to prolong NPWT after 3rd day postop, an anergic wound morphology or slough.

30 days
Pain level
Time Frame: 7 days
Pain measured with Visual Analogue Scale every 8h (subjective pain strength scale from 0 to 10; 0 represents no pain and 10 represents the worst pain)
7 days
Scar quality
Time Frame: 1 year
Measured with Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS). This scale ranges from 0 (representing normal skin) to 13 (representing worst scar imaginable). VSS provides the assessment of the following wound characteristics: pigmentation (0-2), vascularity (0-3), pliability (0-5), height (0-3).
1 year
Cost
Time Frame: 1 year
Cost of hospitalisation and outpatient visits
1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jaroslaw Kobiela, Prof., MUG Division of General Surgery
  • Principal Investigator: Piotr Spychalski, MD PhD, MUG Division of General Surgery
  • Principal Investigator: Katarzyna M Polomska, Medical University of Gdansk (MUG)

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 11, 2023

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

November 1, 2024

Study Completion (Anticipated)

September 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 29, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 11, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

January 13, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 19, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 18, 2023

Last Verified

May 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Infections

Clinical Trials on subcutaneous NPWT

3
Subscribe