Benefits of ADHD Treatment in Detained People (BATIR)

March 13, 2026 updated by: Stéphanie Baggio

Benefits of In-prison OROS-methylphenidate vs. Placebo Treatment in Detained People With Attention-deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is characterized by difficulties paying attention, poor impulse control, and hyperactive behaviors. It is associated with several health and social detrimental outcomes and leads to increased risks of criminality and recidivism. However, to date, ADHD treatment has been neglected in prison. This project will test the efficacy of ADHD treatment using a randomized controlled trial.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

This project aims to compare the efficacy of a three-month in-prison OROS-methylphenidate vs. placebo treatment on the severity of ADHD core symptoms. Secondary outcomes address additional important in-prison and outpatient (in-prison or post-prison) aspects: 1) reduction in acute events in prison (e.g., disciplinary sanctions, violence, misuse of ADHD treatment), 2) evaluation of the risk of recidivism upon release, 3) three-month side effects of treatment, 4) in- and post-prison adherence to medication, 5) in- and post-prison study retention, 6) in- and post-prison costs-benefits of treatment, and 8) one-year rule-breaking behaviour. The outpatient part of the project will highlight long-lasting benefits of a treatment provided during three months while people are detained.

These research questions will be answered using a randomized controlled trial. After randomization, the participants will undertake three months of treatment with OROS-MPH or placebo (1:1 ratio) while they are incarcerated. After three months, all participants will be offered the possibility to have the treatment, but they will remain blinded regarding their initial study group. All of them will benefit of a cognitive-behavioral psycho-education program during detention and a cognitive-behavioral therapy after release.

The RCT will provide empirical-based evidence of the benefits of in-prison ADHD treatment using different perspectives: Clinical, behavioral, rule-breaking-related, and economical. The investigators expect that early detection and treatment of ADHD in prison will be an important public health opportunity and a cost-effective approach, likely to decrease the vulnerability of people living in detention and to promote pathways out criminal involvement.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

150

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Canton of Geneva
      • Geneva, Canton of Geneva, Switzerland, 1211
        • Recruiting
        • Geneva University Hospitals
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • age between 18 and 65
  • good command of French
  • stay in prison approx. 4 months at eligibility visit
  • endorsing clinical diagnostic criteria for DSM-5 ADHD
  • providing written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • presence of an acute uncontrolled comorbid psychiatric disorder
  • medical contraindication to stimulant prescription
  • potential adverse interaction with another medication
  • already receive ADHD treatment

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: Placebo

The placebo will be strictly identical (same packaging, size no. 2 and color according to dosage, with no label).

Procedure for adjustment of dosage will be the same as in the Concerta arm.

Experimental: Pharmaceutical intervention (OROS-MPH)
Participants will receive OROS-MPH (Concerta® available in Switzerland as first-line treatment for ADHD). Dosages will be defined according to the Swiss Compendium. The psychiatrist (blinded during detention) will start with the smallest dosage (18 mg, Concerta®). The treatment will be monitored weekly the first month, and then monthly. The pharmacy of the Geneva University Hospitals will be in charge of over-encapsulating medications.

Dosages of Concerta® will be defined according to the Swiss Compendium (from 18 to 72 mg/d).

The psychiatrist will start with the smallest dosage (18 mg) and will adapt it on a weekly basis or on need, depending on tolerance (side effects measured at each visit), clinical response (subjective improvement felt by the patient in terms of attention, impulsivity, and hyperactivity), and according to the observations made by the professionals or patient's entourage in term of attention, impulsivity, hyperactivity, and for this project, behavioral problems. In general, the dose can be increased in 18 mg at weekly intervals.

The treatment will be monitored weekly the first month, and then monthly, except for side effects which will be monitored daily in prison and every two weeks after release.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Severity of ADHD core symptoms
Time Frame: 3 months
Conners Adult ADHD Rating Scale, range 0-78, higher score indicates worse outcome
3 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of acute events
Time Frame: 3 months
Refusal to see doctors, nurses or lawyers, hunger strikes, self-harm events requiring a visit to the medical unit, fights requiring a visit to the medical unit, and disciplinary sanctions
3 months
Score of risk of recidivism
Time Frame: 3 months
Dynamic risk assessment tool will be used to evaluate the risk of recidivism, score 0-30, higher score indicates better outcome
3 months
Percentage of adherence to medication
Time Frame: 3 months and 12 months in outpatient care
Binary variable (yes=adherence to medication, no=absence of adherence to medication)
3 months and 12 months in outpatient care
Percentage of retention to study
Time Frame: 12 months in outpatient care
Binary variable (yes=remain in the study, no=dropout from the study)
12 months in outpatient care
Costs
Time Frame: 3 months (medical and prison-related costs) and 12 months in outpatient care (prison-related costs)
Medical costs (costs of medical services used by patients (outpatient, emergency, and inpatient resources) and prison-related costs (disciplinary sanctions, use of resources in the prison and in prison staff and recidivism-related costs, average cost for one day in prison), two quantitative variables in Swiss francs.
3 months (medical and prison-related costs) and 12 months in outpatient care (prison-related costs)
Number of rule-breaking events
Time Frame: 12 months in outpatient care
Composite outcome with sanctions recorded in prison and recidivism from the official Swiss criminal records (Federal Office of Statistics, Criminal Conviction Statistics) after release, binary variable (yes=rule-breaking behaviour, no=no rule-breaking behaviour)
12 months in outpatient care

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of side effects
Time Frame: 3 months
Side effects according to the Swiss compendium (number of side effects)
3 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

October 30, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

October 30, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 5, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 22, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

May 6, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 17, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 13, 2026

Last Verified

March 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on ADHD

Clinical Trials on Concerta

Subscribe