Thoracolumbar Interfascial Plane Block in Lumber Spine Surgery

May 19, 2023 updated by: Diaaeldein Mahmoud Haiba, Ain Shams University

Modified Versus Conventional Thoracolumbar Interfascial Plane Block for Perioperative Analgesia in Lumber Spine Surgery. A Randomized Controlled Study.

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare modified versus conventional thoracolumbar interfascial plane block for perioperative analgesia in lumber spine surgery.

The main question it aims to answer is:

• Whether modified thoracolumbar interfascial plane block is as effective as the conventional block for perioperative analgesia in lumber spine surgery.

60 patients were enrolled in the study, divided by simple random sampling into 3 groups.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Spinal surgeries are usually associated with marked postoperative pain that classically takes 3 days to recede.

Adequate perioperative pain control is significant for patients to encourage early mobilization and reduce postoperative adverse events. Discectomy, laminectomy, and spinal fixation are the most frequently performed spinal surgical procedures. Extensive dissection of tissues, ligaments, and bones is often performed during spinal surgeries, resulting in a significant degree of postoperative severe pain. Adequate pain management in these patients is challenging because most of them have already received ordinary analgesics and/or opioids to ameliorate preexistent chronic back pain. Pain following spine surgery can result from mechanical irritation, nerve compression, or postoperative inflammatory processes. It can be generated from different structures such as vertebrae, discs, ligaments, muscles, dural sleeves, and capsules of the facet joint. Innervation of these pain generators is from the dorsal rami of spinal nerves. Opioids are considered the standard method of analgesia and are commonly used as effective analgesics for the management of severe pain disorders. However, their widespread use is restricted because of their side effects such as nausea, vomiting, and respiratory distress, and acquired tolerance. Preemptive multimodal analgesic regimens that rely on the synergistic action of nonopioid agents given in lower doses have been used to improve postoperative pain management and reduce opioid consumption. Protocols for reducing pain after lumbar surgery recommend the use of regional anesthesia techniques to reduce opioid analgesic use to the minimum. Interfascial plane blocks have the potential to provide extended postoperative analgesia and to reduce opioid consumption and neuraxial-related motor block to a minimum. The use of thoracolumbar interfascial plane block TLIP block was first reported in 2015 by Hand et al. wherein they did a volunteer-based study and demarcated the area of sensory analgesia. Thereafter, Ueshima et al. reported two cases of spinal surgeries where TLIP block was administered. TLIP blocks the sensory component of the dorsal rami of the thoracolumbar nerves. These nerves emerge mainly through the interface between the multifidus (MF) and longissimus (LG) muscles. Blocking these nerves provides good analgesia after spine surgeries. TLIP modification where we inject the anaesthetics between the longissimus and iliocostalis muscles after having advanced the needles at a 15 angle in a medial to lateral direction. This modified method has several advantages. 1.Advancing the needle from a medial to lateral direction eliminates the risk of possible inadvertent neuraxial injection. 2.Injecting between the iliocostalis and longissimus muscles results in a dermatomal area of analgesia similar to that obtained with an injection made between the multifidus and longissimus muscles. Both conventional and modified techniques are assumed to be effective and safe.

The primary outcome measure is postoperative pain intensity expressed as A numerical rating scale (NRS) score at time zero (time of extubation), time 1 ( time of delivery to PACU), every 2 hours during the first 6 hours then every 6 hours during the first 24 hours.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

  • Egypt
    • Al Abbassia
      • Cairo, Al Abbassia, Egypt, 11591
        • Recruiting
        • Ain Shams University Hospitals
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients of both sexes admitted to the OR of Ain Shams University Hospitals for lumber disc surgery.
  • Age 18 to 70 year old.
  • ASA classification I and II.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age <18 or >70 years.
  • Declining to give written informed consent.
  • History of allergy to the medications used in the study.
  • Psychiatric disorder.
  • ASA classification III-V.
  • Patients with cerebrovascular accidents.
  • Neuromuscular disorders, spine abnormalities.
  • Spinal cord or head injuries.
  • CNS tumours.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Modified Group
A total of 20 patients undergoing lumber spine surgery receiving modified ultrasound guided thoracolumbar interfascial plane (TLIP) block.
Procedure: Modified ultrasound guided thoracolumbar interfascial plane (TLIP) block.
Patients will be placed in a prone position; modified ultrasound guided TLIP block will be performed using a SonoSite 2-5 MHZ Curved array (C60X) transducer. The transducer will be positioned in a transverse midline position at the level of the L3 vertebra. After the identification of the spinous process and interspinous muscles, the probe will be moved laterally to identify longissimus (LG) and intercostalis muscles. After identifying the muscles and decontamination of the skin, the modified TLIP block will be performed under real-time ultrasound guidance using an insulated 90-mm 22G echogenic needle which will be inserted at a 15ºangle from the skin in-plane in a medial to lateral direction injecting the anesthetic locally between the longissimus and intercostalis muscles, which are easy to define using ultrasonography. After negative aspiration, injection will be in each side bilaterally in the interface between the LG and intercostalis muscles.
Drug: Bupivacain
As a local anesthetic will be injected in modified and conventional groups 20ml in each side.
Active Comparator: Conventional Group
A total of 20 patients undergoing lumber spine surgery receiving conventional ultrasound guided thoracolumbar interfascial plane (TLIP) block.
Drug: Bupivacain
As a local anesthetic will be injected in modified and conventional groups 20ml in each side.
Procedure: Conventional ultrasound guided thoracolumbar interfascial plane (TLIP) block.
Patients will be placed in a prone position; conventional ultrasound guided TLIP block will be performed using a SonoSite 2-5 MHZ Curved array (C60X) transducer. The transducer will be positioned in a transverse midline position at the level of the L3 vertebra. After the identification of the spinous process and interspinous muscles, the probe will be moved laterally to identify the multifidus (MF) and longissimus (LG) muscles. After identifying the muscles and decontamination of the skin, the TLIP block will be performed under real-time ultrasound guidance using an insulated 90-mm 22G echogenic needle which will be inserted at a 30ºangle from the skin in-plane lateral to the medial direction through the belly of the LG toward the MF muscle. After negative aspiration, injection will be done in each side bilaterally in the interface between the MF and LG muscles.
Active Comparator: Morphine Group
A total of 20 patients undergoing lumber spine surgery receiving morphine for peritoperative analgesia (control group).
Drug: Morphine for peritoperative analgesia (control group).
Morphine based analgesia, after emergence they will receive 5mg morphine IV as a start and the rest of the first 24 hours they will receive incremental dose of intravenous morphine according to pain score.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
postoperative pain intensity expressed as A numerical rating scale (NRS) score at time zero (time of extubation).
Time Frame: Time 0 (Time of Extubation)

The numerical rating scale consists of a numeric version of the visual analogue scale. The most common form of the NRS is a horizontal line with an eleven point numeric range.

The numerical rating scale requires the patient to rate their pain on a defined scale. Numerical rating scale (NRS) is the simplest and most commonly used scale. The numerical scale is most commonly 0 to 10, with 0 being "no pain" and 10 being "the worst pain imaginable."
Time 0 (Time of Extubation)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain intensity expressed as A numerical rating scale (NRS) score at time 1 (time of delivery to Post Anesthesia Care Unit PACU).
Time Frame: Time 1 (30 minutes after extubation in the Post Anesthesia Care Unit (PACU).

The numerical rating scale consists of a numeric version of the visual analogue scale. The most common form of the NRS is a horizontal line with an eleven point numeric range.

The numerical rating scale requires the patient to rate their pain on a defined scale. Numerical rating scale (NRS) is the simplest and most commonly used scale. The numerical scale is most commonly 0 to 10, with 0 being "no pain" and 10 being "the worst pain imaginable."
Time 1 (30 minutes after extubation in the Post Anesthesia Care Unit (PACU).
Pain intensity expressed as A numerical rating scale (NRS) score at time 6 (6 hours postoperative).
Time Frame: Time 6 (6 hours postoperative)

The numerical rating scale consists of a numeric version of the visual analogue scale. The most common form of the NRS is a horizontal line with an eleven point numeric range.

The numerical rating scale requires the patient to rate their pain on a defined scale. Numerical rating scale (NRS) is the simplest and most commonly used scale. The numerical scale is most commonly 0 to 10, with 0 being "no pain" and 10 being "the worst pain imaginable."
Time 6 (6 hours postoperative)
Pain intensity expressed as A numerical rating scale (NRS) score at time 24 (24 hours postoperative).
Time Frame: Time 24 (24 hours postoperative)

The numerical rating scale consists of a numeric version of the visual analogue scale. The most common form of the NRS is a horizontal line with an eleven point numeric range.

The numerical rating scale requires the patient to rate their pain on a defined scale. Numerical rating scale (NRS) is the simplest and most commonly used scale. The numerical scale is most commonly 0 to 10, with 0 being "no pain" and 10 being "the worst pain imaginable."
Time 24 (24 hours postoperative)
Early ambulation.
Time Frame: Time of ambulation during first 24 hours postoperative
Time of starting ambulation postoperative
Time of ambulation during first 24 hours postoperative
Time of first rescue analgesic.
Time Frame: During First 24 hours postoperative.
As-needed dose of opioid (morphine) to provide relief of first breakthrough pain.
During First 24 hours postoperative.
Total dose of Postoperative morphine consumption during first 24 hours.
Time Frame: During first 24 hours.
Dose of morphine in milligram
During first 24 hours.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Ain Shams University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2023

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 5, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 19, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

May 30, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 30, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 19, 2023

Last Verified

May 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • FMASU R 167/2022

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe