Diagnostic Performance of the Mitral Annulus Velocity Variation Measured by Tissue Doppler to Evaluate the Fluid Responsiveness During the Initial Management of Shock in Patients Admitted to the Emergency Department (EVO-E')

December 3, 2025 updated by: Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes

Assessing the response to vascular filling in shock is a challenge in emergency medicine.

The mitral annulus velocity measured by tissue Doppler (E') has recently been characterized as sensitive to the preload conditions of a patient.

The investigators hypothesize that the E' variation (∆E') before and after fluid filling allows us to assess the response to vascular filling. The investigators hypothesize that the ∆E' has a good diagnostic performance to establish whether a patient is responsive to fluid filling, defined by an area under the ROC curve greater than 0.75.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

Assessing the response to vascular filling in shock is a challenge in emergency medicine.

Trans thoracic ultrasound (TTS) is recommended for the diagnosis and management of this type of patient. TTS allows real-time monitoring of the effectiveness of a therapeutic . In case of circulatory failure without cardiac failure, it is recommended to perform fluid filling tests based on an increase in of indicators to assess preload dependence. The change in subaortic VTI, which has become the gold standard in clinical practice for diagnosing fluid filling response, suffers from a lack of technical feasibility. The mitral annulus velocity measured by tissue Doppler (E') has recently been characterized as sensitive to the preload conditions of a patient. The high feasibility of this technique makes its study interesting for the evaluation of the preload (and its variation after variation after vascular filling) of the patient in shock in the emergency department. To our knowledge, there are no clinical studies exploring the relevance of this technique to evaluate fluid filling response in patient admitted with shock in the emergency department.

The investigators hypothesize that the E' variation (∆E') before and after fluid filling allows us to assess the response to vascular filling. The investigators hypothesize that the ∆E' has a good diagnostic performance to establish whether a patient is responsive to fluid filling, defined by an area under the ROC curve greater than 0.75.

The main objective of this study is to investigate the diagnostic performance of ∆E' in establishing response to fluid filling in a prospective cohort of patients admitted to the emergency department with shock requiring vascular filling.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

187

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

The study population consisted of patients with shock (MAP < 65 mmHg) requiring vascular filling indicated by the referring physician physician, recruited consecutively in the emergency department of the CHU of Nîmes and Montpellier.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient has been informed of the study and does not refuse to participate.
  • Patient is at least ≥ 18 years of age.
  • The patient must be beneficiary of a health insurance plan.
  • Patient has shock with a mean blood pressure less than 65 mmHg (<)
  • The patient does not have acute intracranial pathology
  • The referring physician has decided on a vascular filling with 500mL of crystalloids (NaCl 0.9% or Ringer lactate)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • The patient has already received 2 vascular fillings since the beginning of his management
  • The patient is in shock and has a contraindication to vascular filling : shock of a cardiogenic or obstructive nature
  • The patient has an intracranial pathology requiring maintain a MAP ≥ 80 mmHg
  • The patient is intubated or on Non-Invasive Ventilation before the vascular filling
  • The patient is under court protection
  • The patient is pregnant, parturient or nursing

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
patients with shock (MAP < 65 mmHg) requiring vascular filling
The study population consisted of patients with shock (MAP < 65 mmHg) requiring vascular filling indicated by the referring physician physician, recruited consecutively in the emergency department of the CHU of Nîmes and Montpellier.
During the inclusion visit, the patient will receive 3 cardiac ultrasonography. The first one will be performed at the time of the initiation of the 500mL vascular filling (T0), without delaying and the second one after the end of the filling (Tfin). These first two ultrasound are part of standard practice. A third will be performed 20 minutes after the end of the vascular filling (Tfin+20).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
E' variation (∆E')
Time Frame: Inclusion time
The E' wave will be measured by tissue Doppler at the initiation (T0) of the filling and after the end of the vascular (Tfin) to determine its variation (%) between these two times of measurement.
Inclusion time
Fluid filling responsiveness
Time Frame: Inclusion time

Vascular filling is defined by the intravenous administration of 500 mL of crystalloid for 20 to 30 minutes, decided by the physician in charge. The response to filling will be evaluated by the variation of the time velocity index between T0 and Tfin (∆ITV) measured with pulsed Doppler.

Patients will be considered :

  • Responder (R) group if ∆ITV ≥ 15%
  • Nonresponder group (NR) if ∆ITV < 15%.
Inclusion time

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
∆E'late
Time Frame: Inclusion time
∆E'late: the E' wave will be measured by trans thoracic ultrasound before vascular filling (T0) and 20 minutes after the end of vascular filling (Tfin+20) to determine its variation (%) between these two times of measurement.
Inclusion time

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

August 8, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 25, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 2, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

June 5, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

December 4, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 3, 2025

Last Verified

December 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2023-A00022-43

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Shock

Clinical Trials on Cardiac ultrasonography

Subscribe