The Effectiveness of Oral Care With Chlorhexidine in Medical Intensive Care Unit

May 6, 2025 updated by: National Taiwan University Hospital

The Effectiveness of Oral Care With Chlorhexidine in Medical Intensive Care Unit:Ventilator-associated Pneumonia and Patient Outcomes

Oral care with chlorhexidine was used to be considered an effective way to prevent ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). However, recent evidence revealed that oral care with chlorhexidine may associate with higher mortality and increasing risks of acute respiratory distress syndrome due to the aspiration of chlorhexidine. In addition, the majority of relevant studies in the past have only focused on cardiothoracic intensive care unit (ICU) or post-operation patients. Thus, whether this is effective and safe for medical ICU patients remains unclear.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is one of the most common hospital-acquired infections in the ICU, associated with an increased hospital stay, increased cost of treatment, prolonged ventilator days, and increased morbidity and mortality rates (Divatia et al, 2019). The overall incidence of VAP was around 12% in Asia and nearly 8% in Taiwan in the past 30 years (Bonell et al, 2019), with a mortality rate that may exceed 45% for those receiving mechanical ventilation (Feng et al, 2019). Therefore, the prevention of VAP is a key part of managing patients undergoing mechanical ventilation.

Oral decolonization by mouthwash using a chlorhexidine-contained solution was suggested by accumulated evidence in preventing VAP (Dai et al, 2022). However, controversial opinions existed from a few different points of view. First of all, Klompas et al (2014) conducted a meta-analysis that showed the effectiveness of chlorhexidine (CHG) oral care in preventing VAP was limited only to cardiac surgery patients (Klomopas et al, 2014). Second, recent evidence showed a possibility of unfavored outcomes related to the use of CHG mouthwash by increased mortality either in the ICU (Price et al, 2014) or the general ward (Deschepper et al, 2018). Last but not least, the subjectiveness of the diagnostic criteria of VAP had led to the discussion on the credibility of the outcome in relevant studies (Skrupky et al, 2016). Therefore, the US Centers for Disease Control and the National Healthcare Safety Network have proposed alternative diagnostic criteria for the ventilator-associated event (VAE) as alternation (Peña-López et al, 2022).

The objective of this study was to examine the effectiveness of oral care with 0.12% CHG in MICU patients for the prevention of ventilator-associated events.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

141

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Taipei, Taiwan, 100
        • National Taiwan University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • patients aged over 20 years old
  • admitted to MICU
  • an oral endotracheal tube inserted under mechanically ventilated

Exclusion Criteria:

  • an endotracheal tube inserted over 24 hours before enrollment
  • intubated because of trauma, burn, operation, or neurological disease
  • already suffered from oral ulcers before intubation
  • known history of allergic reaction to CHG
  • use of ECMO

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Chlorhexidine group
Applying 0.12% chlorhexidine mouthwash for oral care thrice daily.
15ml of 0.12% chlorhexidine will be applied to irregate the oral cavity after the swabing of the surface of patients' teeth and oral cavity by a sponge swab by the primary care nurse in the MICU.
Active Comparator: Normal saline group
Applying normal saline for oral care thrice daily.
Normal saline will be applied to irregate the oral cavity after the swabing of the surface of patients' teeth and oral cavity by a sponge swab by the primary care nurse in the MICU.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Incidence of ventilator-associated event within ICU admission
Time Frame: Will be surveyed retrospectively through study completion within 3 months
The US CDC has proposed an objective diagnostic criteria to identify adverse events during mechanical ventilation, which comprises three levels: ventilator-associated condition (VAC), infection-related ventilator-associated condition (IVAC), and possible ventilator-associated pneumonia (PVAP).
Will be surveyed retrospectively through study completion within 3 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
ICU length of stay
Time Frame: Will be surveyed retrospectively through study completion within 3 months
The total duration of the patient's ICU stay (days).
Will be surveyed retrospectively through study completion within 3 months
Hospital length of stay
Time Frame: Will be surveyed retrospectively through study completion within 3 months
The total duration of the patient's hospital stay (days).
Will be surveyed retrospectively through study completion within 3 months
ICU mortality
Time Frame: Will be surveyed retrospectively through study completion within 3 months
Whether the patient has died during their stay in the ICU
Will be surveyed retrospectively through study completion within 3 months
Hospital mortality
Time Frame: Will be surveyed retrospectively through study completion within 3 months
Whether the patient has died during their stay in the hospital
Will be surveyed retrospectively through study completion within 3 months
Changes in the oral health status evaluated by the Beck Oral Assessment Scale
Time Frame: The surveys will be conducted within 24 hours of patient enrollment, within the fourth day after the patient is intubated, and within the 1 day following extubation.
The status of oral health will be evaluated using the Beck Oral Assessment Scale by the researcher, which provides a comprehensive evaluation of oral health by assessing various parameters such as lips, tongue, gums, and teeth.
The surveys will be conducted within 24 hours of patient enrollment, within the fourth day after the patient is intubated, and within the 1 day following extubation.
Changes in the oral health status evaluated by the Mucosal-Plaque Score
Time Frame: The surveys will be conducted within 24 hours of patient enrollment, within the fourth day after the patient is intubated, and within the 1 day following extubation.
The status of oral health will be evaluated using the Mucosal-Plaque Score by the researcher, which focuses specifically on assessing the presence and extent of mucosal inflammation and plaque accumulation in the oral cavity.
The surveys will be conducted within 24 hours of patient enrollment, within the fourth day after the patient is intubated, and within the 1 day following extubation.
Incidence of Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia
Time Frame: From the date of intubation until the first occurrence of extubation or in-ICU death, whichever occurs first, assessed up to 28 days.

Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) will be included as an additional secondary outcome. Diagnosis of VAP will follow the 2016 Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) and American Thoracic Society (ATS) clinical practice guidelines.

A case of VAP is defined by the presence of a new or progressive pulmonary infiltrate on chest radiograph, plus at least two of the following clinical features:

Fever >38°C or hypothermia <36°C,leukocytosis (>12,000/μL) or leukopenia (<4,000/μL), or purulent tracheal secretions.

Chart reviews will be conducted in a two-step process: (1) initial screening by trained research staff based on clinical documentation (excluding radiographic findings), and (2) blinded interpretation of chest X-rays by a physician reviewer. The diagnostic window for VAP will be based on the temporal cluster of clinical signs, typically within ±48 hours. The outcome will be reported as the number of VAP cases per group, and if data permits, as incidence per 1,000 ventilator

From the date of intubation until the first occurrence of extubation or in-ICU death, whichever occurs first, assessed up to 28 days.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Yi-Chen Lin, National Taiwan University Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 4, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 30, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

December 30, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 4, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 13, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

June 22, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 8, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 6, 2025

Last Verified

August 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Ventilator Associated Pneumonia

Clinical Trials on Chlorhexidine

Subscribe