Identifying Vulnerable CoronAry PLaqUes With Artificial IntElligence-assisted CT Angiography (VALUE)

May 6, 2026 updated by: Zhang longjiang,MD, Jinling Hospital, China

Development and Validation of Multi-scale Deep Neural Network-Based CT Intelligent Diagnosis System for Coronary Vulnerable Plaques: A Chinese Multicenter Study

The goal of this observational study is to develop an automatic whole-process AI model to detect, quantify, and characterize plaques using coronary CT angiography in coronary artery disease patients. The main questions it aims to answer are:

  1. Whether the AI model enables to detect and quantify coronary plaques compared with intravascular ultrasound or expert readers;
  2. Whether the AI model enables to identify vulnerable plaques using intravascular ultrasound or optical coherence tomography as the reference standard.
  3. Whether the AI model enables to predict future adverse cardiac events in a large cohort of 10,000 patients with non-obstructive CAD.
  4. Whether the AI model enables to influnece downstream clincial decision-making.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Coronary artery disease (CAD) remains the leading cause of death worldwide. Atherosclerotic plaques play a pivotal role in CAD-related patient mortality. Thus, the detection, quantification, and characterization of coronary plaques are clinically significant for early prevention and interventions for CAD.

Coronary CT angiography (CCTA) has emerged as a robust noninvasive tool for the evaluation of CAD. In clinical practice, the coronary plaque assessment is performed by a time-consuming manual process dependent on the clinician's experience and subjective visual interpretation. With the development of artificial intelligence, many automatic computer-aided methods have been proposed to post-process the CCTA images. However, previously proposed algorithms of plaque evaluation were not developed based on intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) or optical coherence tomography (OCT), which were regarded as the gold reference for plaque evaluation. Thus, we aimed to develop a deep learning model in a whole-process automatic and intelligent system on CCTA to detect, quantify, and characterize plaques using IVUS or OCT as reference standard. Then we will work on the validation in different clinical scenarios: (1) Validation of the accuracy of the new deep learning model; (2) Prognosis of the model in different populations with CAD; (3) Impact of the model on guiding clincial therapies.

The main questions it aims to answer are:

  1. Whether the AI model enables to detect and quantify coronary plaques compared with intravascular ultrasound or expert readers;
  2. Whether the AI model enables to identify vulnerable plaques using IVUS or OCT as the reference standard.
  3. Whether the AI model enables to predict future adverse cardiac events in a large cohort of 10,000 patients with non-obstructive coronary artery disease (China CT-FFR study 2).
  4. Whether the AI model enables to influnece downstream clincial decision-making in real-world clincial practice.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

2000

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Jiangsu
      • Nanjing, Jiangsu, China, 210018
        • Research Institute Of Medical Imaging Jinling Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

consecutive patients who first underwent CCTA and then Intravascular imaging in China

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Intravascular imaging (including intravascular ultrasound or optical coherence tomography) was performed within 3 months after CCTA;
  • No change in medications or clinical symptoms during CCTA and intravascular imaging examinations;
  • Coronary artery diameter stenosis of 30% to 90% on invasive coronary imaging.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Image quality of CCTA or intravascular US was inadequate to analyze;
  • Intravascular imaging was performed after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or pre-dilation of the target lesions;
  • Lesions could not be co-registered between CCTA and intravascular US;
  • Missing CCTA or intravascular US data

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Patients who underwent coronary CT angiography and intravascular ultrasound within 3 months
Coronary artery disease patients first underwent CCTA and then intravascular imaging test within 3 months.
Patients who underwent coronary CT angiography and optical coherence tomography within 3 months
Coronary artery disease patients first underwent CCTA and then intravascular imaging test within 3 months.
Patients who underwent coronary CT angiography because of suspected or known coronary artery disease
Plaques on coronary CT angiography (CCTA) were quantified and characterized using the developed AI model.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Sensitivity and specificity of AI-assisted coronary CT angiography on identifying vulnerable plaques compared to intravascular imaging
Time Frame: 1 day
1 day

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Overall coronary plaque detection rate using intravascular ultrasound as reference standard
Time Frame: 1 day
1 day
Total plaque volume
Time Frame: 1 day
1 day
Changes in medical management following the addition of the AI model compared with routine CCTA results alone.
Time Frame: 90 days
90 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Longjiang Zhang, MD, Jinling Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing,China

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 30, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 5, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

September 6, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 11, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 6, 2026

Last Verified

May 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe