PRO for Fighting FT in Ovarian Cancer (MITO45-ProFFiT)

September 13, 2023 updated by: National Cancer Institute, Naples

Patient-Reported Outcome for Fighting Financial Toxicity in Ovarian Cancer

Non-profit, multicenter, prospective, observational study. This study aims to evaluate whether the articulated treatment algorithm that is now possible for OC patients does produce tangible changes of financial distress over the time and whether the determinants of financial distress change their relative weight over the time.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

PROFFIT questionnaire is an Italian instrument for evaluating FT in cancer patients in the Italian healthcare context. It includes 16 total items, 7 measuring FT (defining the PROFFIT financial score) and 9 measuring possible determinants of FT.The primary aim of the study is to compare PROFFIT financial score (items 1-7 measuring the financial distress) across different lines of treatment for OC patients undergoing anticancer medical treatment. Primary comparison will be based on PROFFIT questionnaire fulfilled at baseline, before starting each line of treatment.

In addition, among secondary aims of this study, we aim to verify whether FT is associated with quality of life response (items 29-30 of the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire and items 55-56 of the EORTC QLQ-OV28 questionnaire), with patient-self reporting toxicity of treatments (selected symptoms of the PRO-CTCAE library response), and with overall survival.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

240

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Naples, Italy
        • Nation Cancer Institute of Naples, Division of Medical Oncology - Uro-Gynecology Department
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients with OC candidate to medical treatment (see cohorts definition).

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Written informed consent provided;
  • Women ≥18 years;
  • Histologically or citologically confirmed diagnosis of epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube or peritoneal cancer stage IC-IV according to FIGO staging system;
  • Patients who are close to begin any type of medical treatment against ovarian cancer.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Major cognitive dysfunction or psychiatric disorders;
  • Patients with epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube or peritoneal cancer candidate exclusively to follow-up;
  • Patients who have received more than 4 previous lines of medical treatment (maintenance treatments do not represent a line).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Cohort 1:
Patients undergoing their first medical treatment for OC (including adjuvant and neo-adjuvant chemotherapy and first-line treatment for advanced in patients not previously treated with adjuvant chemotherapy)
The PROFFIT questionnaire is a PRO instrument composed by 16 items encompassing all the major life domains where FT can be expressed and is formed by two type of items: (1) outcome (items 1-7) and (2) determinants (items 8-16); EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire (items 29-30) and OV28 (items 55-58); PRO-CTCAE: short list of 43 symptoms relevant for ovarian cancer
Other Names:
  • Questionnaires: PROFFIT, EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire (items 29-30), EORTC OV28 (items 55-58), PRO-CTCAE
Cohort 2
Patients undergoing their second medical treatment for OC (including the second-line treatment for advanced disease and the first-line treatment for advanced disease in patients previously treated with adjuvant CT)
The PROFFIT questionnaire is a PRO instrument composed by 16 items encompassing all the major life domains where FT can be expressed and is formed by two type of items: (1) outcome (items 1-7) and (2) determinants (items 8-16); EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire (items 29-30) and OV28 (items 55-58); PRO-CTCAE: short list of 43 symptoms relevant for ovarian cancer
Other Names:
  • Questionnaires: PROFFIT, EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire (items 29-30), EORTC OV28 (items 55-58), PRO-CTCAE
Cohort 3
Patients undergoing their third medical treatment for OC (including the third-line treatment for advanced disease and the second-line treatment for advanced disease in patients previously treated with adjuvant CT)
The PROFFIT questionnaire is a PRO instrument composed by 16 items encompassing all the major life domains where FT can be expressed and is formed by two type of items: (1) outcome (items 1-7) and (2) determinants (items 8-16); EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire (items 29-30) and OV28 (items 55-58); PRO-CTCAE: short list of 43 symptoms relevant for ovarian cancer
Other Names:
  • Questionnaires: PROFFIT, EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire (items 29-30), EORTC OV28 (items 55-58), PRO-CTCAE
Cohort 4
Patients undergoing their fourth medical treatment for OC (including the fourth- treatment for advanced disease and the third-line treatment for advanced disease in patients previously treated with adjuvant CT)
The PROFFIT questionnaire is a PRO instrument composed by 16 items encompassing all the major life domains where FT can be expressed and is formed by two type of items: (1) outcome (items 1-7) and (2) determinants (items 8-16); EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire (items 29-30) and OV28 (items 55-58); PRO-CTCAE: short list of 43 symptoms relevant for ovarian cancer
Other Names:
  • Questionnaires: PROFFIT, EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire (items 29-30), EORTC OV28 (items 55-58), PRO-CTCAE

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Financial Toxicity "PROFFIT financial score"
Time Frame: baseline visit, at the end of every cycle of treatment (each cycle is 21 or 28 days depending of type of therapy), and at time of progressive disease (PD) per RECIST 1.1 up to 36 months
PROFFIT financial score is defined according to items 1-7 of the PROFFIT questionnaire. It will be calculated according to published rules (Riva S, et al. BMJ Open. 2019 Sep;9(9):e031485).
baseline visit, at the end of every cycle of treatment (each cycle is 21 or 28 days depending of type of therapy), and at time of progressive disease (PD) per RECIST 1.1 up to 36 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Financial toxicity "Determinants"
Time Frame: baseline visit, at the end of every cycle of treatment (each cycle is 21 or 28 days depending of type of therapy), and at time of progressive disease (PD) per RECIST 1.1 up to 36 months.
The baseline score for determinants (items 8-16) and their change during treatment
baseline visit, at the end of every cycle of treatment (each cycle is 21 or 28 days depending of type of therapy), and at time of progressive disease (PD) per RECIST 1.1 up to 36 months.
Changes of PROFFIT financial score
Time Frame: baseline visit, at the end of every cycle of treatment (each cycle is 21 or 28 days depending of type of therapy), and at time of progressive disease (PD) per RECIST 1.1 up to 36 months
Changes of PROFFIT financial score (items 1-7) from baseline during treatment, will be assessed as secondary endpoints.
baseline visit, at the end of every cycle of treatment (each cycle is 21 or 28 days depending of type of therapy), and at time of progressive disease (PD) per RECIST 1.1 up to 36 months
Quality of Life (QoL)
Time Frame: baseline visit, at the end of every cycle of treatment (each cycle is 21 or 28 days depending of type of therapy), and at time of progressive disease (PD) per RECIST 1.1 up to 36 months
QoL will be assessed as secondary endpoint using selected QoL items (items 29-30 of the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire, items 55-56 of the EORTC QLQ-OV28 questionnaire) and selected symptoms of the PRO-CTCAE library.
baseline visit, at the end of every cycle of treatment (each cycle is 21 or 28 days depending of type of therapy), and at time of progressive disease (PD) per RECIST 1.1 up to 36 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Sandro Pignata, MD, PhD, National Cancer Institute, Naples

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

September 30, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 8, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 4, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

September 13, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 14, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 13, 2023

Last Verified

September 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Ovarian Cancer

Clinical Trials on Questionnaires

3
Subscribe