Bedside Ultrasound Assessment of Feeding Tube Position in the Intensive Care Unit (US-FEED)

October 5, 2023 updated by: Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre

Bedside Ultrasound Assessment of Feeding Tube Position in the Intensive Care Unit: the US-FEED Study

This diagnostic accuracy study aims to evaluate the performance of bedside ultrasound compared to x-ray in detecting the correct position of feeding tubes among critically ill adult patients. The main questions it aims to answer are: • diagnostic accuracy of bedside ultrasound • feasibility of its wide adoption among practitioners with minimal training in busy intensive care units.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Detailed Description

This multicenter diagnostic accuracy study consists of a non-consecutive convenience sample of adult patients admitted to the intensive care unit starting from March 2023 who require a feeding tube as defined by the medical attending team.

Right after feeding tube placement following the institutional standard operating procedure, attending physicians perform bedside ultrasound assessment to verify the correct position of the tube. They report whether or not visualizing the feeding tube in four steps: 1) in the esophagus from either the right or left side of the patient's neck; 2) in the transverse view of the patient's epigastrium; 3) in the longitudinal view of the patient's epigastrium and 4) during the injection of 20 mL of air into the tube to detect the 'fogging sign.' Finally, the abdominal radiograph (gold standard) confirms the gastric or duodenal placement of the feeding tube.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

423

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Rio Grande Do Sul
      • Porto Alegre, Rio Grande Do Sul, Brazil, 90035-003
        • Recruiting
        • Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Adult critically ill patients admitted in the intensive care unit undergoing a tube feeding placement as defined by the attending medical team and in accordance with the institutional standard operating procedure.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age greater than or equal to 18 years old;
  • Need for a tube feeding for receiving diet and/or medication, as indicated by the medical team;
  • Blind insertion of a tube feeding in the intensive care unit, following the standard operating procedure;
  • Presence of a trained physician for ultrasound scanning of the tube feeding immediately after installation.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Major abdominal postoperative wounds, peritoneostomy, or any other conditions that preclude ultrasound abdominal examination;
  • Exclusive presence of a gastric decompression probe, which does not require radiographic confirmation;
  • Tube feeding introduced under digestive endoscopy guidance;
  • Gestation;
  • Abdominal radiography confirming the tube position obtained before the ultrasound assessment.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Diagnostic group
Adult ICU patients submitted to feeding tube placement according to institutional standard operating procedure

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Diagnostic accuracy
Time Frame: The expected time between ultrasound assessment and abdominal radiography is under 2 hours..
Estimating sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive rate, negative predictive rate, and total accuracy of bedside ultrasound compared with abdominal radiography (gold standard). A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve will display the discriminatory properties of the ultrasound assessment.
The expected time between ultrasound assessment and abdominal radiography is under 2 hours..

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Ana Carolina P Antonio, PhD, HCPorto Alegre

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 24, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

September 30, 2023

Study Completion (Estimated)

July 16, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 5, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 5, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

October 11, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 11, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 5, 2023

Last Verified

October 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2022-0627

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Critical Illness

Subscribe