- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06112431
Eye Health Intervention Study in Upper Manhattan (EYES-UM)
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Populations in urban settings such as Upper Manhattan, have limited access to eye care, high vision impairment rates, and poor ocular health outcomes. Our team of vision researchers designed the Eye Health Intervention Study in Upper Manhattan (EYES-UM) to provide eye health screenings directly in Upper Manhattan, in familiar and accessible settings. The proposed innovative, 2:1 cluster-randomized clinical trial, will recruit adults age 40 and older in Upper Manhattan with high rates of inadequate eye care.
A total of 10 settings in Upper Manhattan, comprised of health centers and senior centers, confirms access to 17,000 individuals. This study will conduct ocular tests (visual acuity, intraocular pressure, fundus images) during screenings. To ensure that all participants receive the basic level of service, all participants who fail the eye health screening will be seen the same day by a study optometrist and eyeglasses will be provided at no charge. Educational workshops and an Advisory Board will support recruitment. Intervention Arm participants will receive ongoing support with scheduling eye exams and transportation by trained study coordinators. All participants will be followed prospectively for 2 years. The study is guided by the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance (RE-AIM) Framework: In Aim 1, we will evaluate the effectiveness of an Eye Health Intervention to improve access to vision health services in 10 settings in Upper Manhattan. After eye health screenings and optometric exams, we will conduct a 2:1 cluster-randomized clinical trial using an Intervention to provide eye exam scheduling and transportation for those referred to ophthalmology to improve in-office eye exam adherence behavior over 2 years (primary implementation outcome) and eye disease detection (primary clinical effectiveness outcome). In Aim 2, using the RE-AIM Framework, we will evaluate the implementation of the Eye Health Intervention using mixed-methods. Aim 3 includes a proactive implementation science approach to produce a real-world Vision Health Policy Roadmap by conducting Focus Groups with health policy stakeholders to understand evidence needed to develop scalable and sustainable nationwide vision care delivery models and how to incentivize payors to ensure the success of these efforts. The Eye Health Intervention will protect and improve vision health outcomes and provide a sustainable model that can be scaled-up in many settings. By providing basic eye care services and eyeglasses to all participants, simplifying access and supporting utilization of in-office eye care, this innovative research strategy will generate important evidence and a roadmap for policy change to advance vision health. This innovative approach using Focus Groups ensures iterative input during the study to bridge and translate EYES-UM findings into a Vision Health Policy Roadmap for scalable implementation of vision care delivery models, focusing on adherence.
Study Type
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
New York
-
New York, New York, United States, 10032
- Cuimc/Nyph
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Individuals age 40 years or older.
- Living independently.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Self-reported terminal illness with life expectancy of less than 1 year.
- Inability to provide informed consent due to dementia or other reason.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Screening
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Intervention Arm
Participants randomized to the Intervention Arm and referred to ophthalmology will receive assistance from a Study Coordinator with scheduling in-office eye exam appointment and arranging transportation to these appointments over 2 years at either Columbia Ophthalmology, Harlem Hospital, or their own eye care provider.
|
Participants randomized to the Intervention Arm and referred to ophthalmology will receive assistance from a Study Coordinator with scheduling in-office eye exam appointment and arranging transportation to these appointments over 2 years at either Columbia Ophthalmology, Harlem Hospital, or their own eye care provider.
|
|
Placebo Comparator: Usual Care
Consented participants randomized to the Usual Care Arm will receive all the basic level of services including the eye health screening, optometric exam if they fail the screening, and eyeglasses at no charge.
Those who require referral to ophthalmology will be scheduled for the initial in-office eye exam and their outcomes will be tracked.
No additional support will be provided the Usual Care participants during the study.
The Usual Care Arm represents a realistic choice currently available for participants following eye health screening.
|
Consented participants randomized to the Usual Care Arm will receive all the basic level of services including the eye health screening, optometric exam if they fail the screening, and eyeglasses at no charge.
Those who require referral to ophthalmology will be scheduled for the initial in-office eye exam and their outcomes will be tracked.
No additional support will be provided the Usual Care participants during the study.
The Usual Care Arm represents a realistic choice currently available for participants following eye health screening.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Primary Implementation Outcome: Adherence to IN-OFFICE Eye Exam for those referred to ophthalmology
Time Frame: 2 years
|
The primary implementation outcome measure for Aim 1 is ADHERENCE TO IN-OFFICE eye exam for those referred to ophthalmology and will be measured by appointment attendance at the initial in-office eye exam appointment for those referred to ophthalmology.
The unit of measure is the eye exam appointment, which will be scheduled within 6-months (+/-4 months) of the referral at either Columbia Ophthalmology, Harlem Hospital or their own eye care provider.
The measure will assess the rate of adherence at the initial appointment.
Comparisons will be made between the Intervention Arm and the Usual Care Arm.
|
2 years
|
|
Primary Clinical Effectiveness Outcome: Detection of Eye Disease
Time Frame: 2 years
|
The primary clinical effectiveness outcome measure for Aim 1 is detection of eye disease(s) (glaucoma, retina, other) confirmed by in-office eye exams and will be measured by rates of detection of eye disease(s) for those referred to ophthalmology.
All initial in-office eye exams will be scheduled at the conclusion of eye health screenings.
Outcome measures will assess rates of eye disease detection, specifically glaucoma/suspect, among those referred to ophthalmology.
A comparison will be made between participants living in the 7 health settings randomized to the Intervention Arm compared to 3 settings randomized to Usual Care Arm.
Participants who request their own eye doctor, the medical release form will be signed, and we will schedule the eye exam, so we can also track attendance.
|
2 years
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Follow-up Adherence to Recommended In-office Eye Exams at 1 - 4 Years
Time Frame: 4 years
|
A maintenance measure is adherence to recommended in-office eye exams for those who attend the initial eye exam to determine access to care sustainability and will be reported by randomization group.
Adherence will be assessed annually on the basis of the expected follow-up schedule defined at the index visit for that year if the participant attends.
In the first year, the follow-up recommendation given by the ophthalmologist will be classified into 1 of 4 categories: return within 2 months, return in 3 to 4 months, return in 6 months, or return in 12 months.
This follow-up recommendation will be translated into the corresponding expected number of visits per year: 6, 3, 2, or 1.
|
4 years
|
|
Return Attendance at Eye Health Screenings at 1, 2, and 3 Years
Time Frame: 1, 2, and 3 years
|
As a safety net, all participants will be informed of the future dates of the eye health screenings but not required to attend.
We hypothesize that participants will return at various intervals (1, 2, and/or 3 times) and we want to understand the demographic and clinical characteristics of these participants as well as the frequency of attendance and why they returned and compare to those who do not participate again at the health setting.
The intervals will be 12, 24 or 36 months and we will measure the number and percentage of participants who attend the eye health screenings over 4 years.
We will provide descriptive statistics of participants who re turn to the eye health screenings at these intervals to understand the characteristics associated with return attendance.
|
1, 2, and 3 years
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Lisa A. Hark, PhD, MBA, Columbia University Department of Ophthalmology
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Estimated)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Neurologic Manifestations
- Endocrine System Diseases
- Nervous System Diseases
- Vascular Diseases
- Cardiovascular Diseases
- Diabetes Mellitus
- Eye Diseases
- Diabetic Angiopathies
- Diabetes Complications
- Sensation Disorders
- Lens Diseases
- Retinal Diseases
- Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms
- Signs and Symptoms
- Diabetic Retinopathy
- Cataract
- Refractive Errors
- Ocular Hypertension
- Blindness
- Vision Disorders
- Investigative Techniques
- Methods
Other Study ID Numbers
- AAAV6542
- PA-25-305 (Other Grant/Funding Number: National Eye Institute)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Diabetic Retinopathy
-
Retina Institute of HawaiiUnknownDiabetic Macular Edema | Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy | Severe Nonproliferative Diabetic Retinopathy | Mild Nonproliferative Diabetic Retinopathy | Moderate Nonproliferative Diabetic RetinopathyUnited States
-
Sara A BelalRecruitingDiabetes (DM) | Diabetic Retinopathy (DR) | Retinopathy, Diabetic | Diabetic Retinopathy Associated With Type 2 Diabetes MellitusEgypt
-
Bojie HuCompletedProliferative Diabetic RetinopathyChina
-
University of CataniaUnknownProliferative Diabetic Retinopathy | Non Proliferative Diabetic RetinopathyItaly
-
Da Nang Family General HospitalRecruiting
-
Federico II UniversityCompletedDiabetic Retinopathy, DRItaly
-
Osijek University HospitalRecruitingDiabetic Macular Edema (DME) | Diabetic Retinopathy (DR)Croatia
-
Ain Shams UniversityNational Institute of Diabetes and Endocrinology, EgyptRecruitingDiabetic Retinopathy (DR)Egypt
-
Centervue SpANot yet recruitingDiabetic Retinopathy (DR)
-
University of Illinois at ChicagoNational Eye Institute (NEI)RecruitingDiabetic Retinopathy (DR)United States
Clinical Trials on Intervention
-
Biolux Research Holdings, Inc.TerminatedOrthodontic Tooth MovementCanada
-
Nottingham Trent UniversityUnknownOverweight and ObesityUnited Kingdom
-
University of Southern DenmarkTrygFonden, DenmarkUnknownObesity | Overweight | Metabolic Syndrome | ChildrenDenmark
-
University of California, San FranciscoNational Cancer Institute (NCI)CompletedColorectal Carcinoma | Healthy Subject | Health Status UnknownUnited States
-
University of FloridaCompletedSensitivityUnited States
-
Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer CenterCompleted
-
Mayo ClinicNational Cancer Institute (NCI)WithdrawnCancer Survivor | Peripheral Sensory Neuropathy
-
Roswell Park Cancer InstituteNational Cancer Institute (NCI)CompletedStage 0a Bladder Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage 0is Bladder Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage I Bladder Cancer AJCC v8United States
-
Universidad de ExtremaduraDiputación Provincial de BadajozRecruitingHealth Education | Gamification in Health EducationSpain
-
Jordi Gol i Gurina FoundationInstituto de Salud Carlos IIINot yet recruiting