Catheter Ablation in Atrial Fibrillation Patients With HFpEF (STABLE-SR IV Trial)

December 5, 2023 updated by: Minglong Chen, The First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University

Catheter Ablation in Atrial Fibrillation Patients With Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction: an International, Prospective, Multi-center, Randomized Controlled Study (STABLE-SR IV Trial)

To investigate whether RFCA is superior to AADs in AF patients with HFpEF on the basis of optimized anti-heart-failure drug therapy regarding their longterm clinical outcomes.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Background: Atrial Fibrillation (AF) is a common cardiac rhythm disorder and radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) has become the first-line therapy in the symptomatic AF patients. Heart failure is often the sister disease with AF. Recently, RFCA was found to be superior to antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs) in heart failure patients with AF and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), regarding all-cause mortality and hospitalization for worsening heart failure (HF). However, in heart failure patients with AF and preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), it remains unknown whether RFCA is superior to AADs in an even larger population, despite several nonrandomized retrospective studies. Thus, this prospective, multi-center, randomized controlled trial aims to investigate whether RFCA could better improve the clinical outcome of AF patients with HFpEF than longterm AADs use.

Aim of this study: To investigate whether RFCA is superior to AADs in AF patients with HFpEF on the basis of optimized anti-heart-failure drug therapy regarding their longterm clinical outcomes.

Design: The STABLE-SR-IV trial is an international, prospective, multi-center, randomized controlled trial. In this trial, physical examination, echocardiogram, NT-proBNP and other blood test would be assessed before enrollment. Those who conform to all the inclusion criteria and absent from any exclusion criteria would enter into a run-in period of 5 weeks (±7 days). Anticoagulation and anti-heart-failure therapy for HFpEF must be optimized according to the current guideline. After the run-in period, inclusion and exclusion criteria would be reassessed. Thereafter, all the subjects enrolled would be randomized into RFCA arm and Medical Therapy arm with a 1:1 manner, namely 218 subjects in each arm. Each arm will follow the protocol of RFCA and medical therapy, respectively. Follow-up duration of this study is up to 2~3 years (12 month enrollment).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

436

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Nanjing, China
        • Recruiting
        • The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University
        • Contact:
          • Hailei Liu

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Symptomatic paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation
  • CHADS2-VASc score≥ 2
  • Conform to the diagnosis of HFpEF

    1. NYHA II-IV level;
    2. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF)≥ 50%;
    3. NT-proBNP≥ 300 pg/mL under sinus rhythm or NT-proBNP≥ 600 pg/mL under atrial fibrillation or flutter;
    4. Evidence of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction/raised left ventricular filling pressure on echocardiogram.
  • Sign informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • A life expectancy below 2 years due to any non-cardiovascular condition
  • Reversible atrial fibrillation, such as hyperthyroidism or hypokalemia-related atrial fibrillation
  • Prior atrial fibrillation ablation
  • Left atrial size≥ 55 mm
  • Heart failure due to any of the following: known genetic hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, infiltrative cardiomyopathy, arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy, constrictive pericarditis, active myocarditis, cardiac tamponade, or uncorrected primary valvular disease
  • Previous cardiac transplantation, complex congenital heart disease, rheumatic heart disease
  • Any contraindication for radiofrequency catheter ablation, antiarrhythmic drugs or anticoagulation
  • Acute coronary syndrome, cardiac surgery, angioplasty or cerebrovascular accident within 12 weeks before enrollment
  • Severe hepatic and renal dysfunction
  • Body mass index> 50 kg/m2
  • Female in period of pregnancy or breast-feeding
  • Any conditions that, in the opinion of the investigator, may render the patient unable to complete the study
  • Involved in other studies

The inclusion and exclusion criteria would be reassessed after run-in period and the cut-off of NT-proBNP would be set as >125 pg/ml under sinus rhythm or >365 pg/ml under AF/atrial flutter (AFL).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA)
Radiofrequency ablation is adopted in the study, instead of cryo ablation, surgical ablation or pulsed field ablation. 3-dimensional model is constructed after transseptal puncture. Circumferential pulmonary vein isolation (CPVI) is performed with irrigated contact force catheter. Previously published STABLE-SR approach is recommended as the ablation strategy beyond CPVI.
Radiofrequency ablation is adopted in the study, instead of cryo ablation, surgical ablation or pulsed field ablation. 3-dimensional model is constructed after transseptal puncture. Circumferential pulmonary vein isolation (CPVI) is performed with irrigated contact force catheter. Previously published STABLE-SR approach is recommended as the ablation strategy beyond CPVI.
Active Comparator: Medical therapy
AADs should be prescribed according to the current guidelines, such as amiodarone, dronedarone, or propafenone. In brief, rhythm control is preferred, including electric cardioversion. However, rate control should be considered if rhythm control is contraindicated, intolerated or unpreferred by patients.
AADs should be prescribed according to the current guidelines, such as amiodarone, dronedarone, or propafenone. In brief, rhythm control is preferred, including electric cardioversion. However, rate control should be considered if rhythm control is contraindicated, intolerated or unpreferred by patients.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Composite endpoint of worsening heart failure requiring unplanned hospitalizations or urgent visits, and cardiovascular death (Time-to-first event analysis)
Time Frame: From randomization until completion of the planned follow-up, up to 36 months
From randomization until completion of the planned follow-up, up to 36 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time to hospitalization or urgent visits for heart failure
Time Frame: From randomization until completion of the planned follow-up, up to 36 months
Worsening heart failure includes worsening heart failure requiring unplanned hospitalization and worsening heart failure requiring urgent visits.
From randomization until completion of the planned follow-up, up to 36 months
Time to hospitalization for heart failure
Time Frame: From randomization until completion of the planned follow-up, up to 36 months

In addition to signs and symptoms of HF, the patient should also receive treatment specifically directed at HF, including at least 1 of the following: 1) significant augmentation in oral diuretic therapy; 2) initiation of intravenous diuretic (even a single dose) or vasoactive agent (eg, vasodilator, vasopressor, or inotropic therapy); or 3) mechanical circulatory support or fluid removal.

Unplanned hospitalization is defined as any unscheduled hospital admission with a length of stay that either exceeds 24 h or crosses a calendar day, and not planned by the investigators. In case the hospitalization is classified as planned by the Investigator and the time interval between the decision to admit and the admission is less than 24 hours, the End Point and Adverse Event Committee will give final classification concerning planned or unplanned.

From randomization until completion of the planned follow-up, up to 36 months
Time to urgent visits for heart failure
Time Frame: From randomization until completion of the planned follow-up, up to 36 months
Worsening of Heart Failure Requiring Unplanned Urgent Visits Patients have an urgent, unscheduled office or emergency visit for HF with signs, symptoms, and diagnostic testing results identical to those already described for an HF hospitalization. The patient must also (with the exception of significant augmentation in oral diuretic therapy) require therapy similar to that previously described for an HF hospitalization.
From randomization until completion of the planned follow-up, up to 36 months
Time to cardiovascular death
Time Frame: From randomization until completion of the planned follow-up, up to 36 months
All deaths due to cardiovascular reasons and all heart transplants because of terminal HF. Deaths due to worsening of HF, acute coronary syndrome, cerebrovascular accident.
From randomization until completion of the planned follow-up, up to 36 months
Time to all-cause death
Time Frame: From randomization until completion of the planned follow-up, up to 36 months
All deaths were reviewed and adjudicated by the Clinical Events Committee
From randomization until completion of the planned follow-up, up to 36 months
Time to cardiovascular hospitalization
Time Frame: From randomization until completion of the planned follow-up, up to 36 months
Unplanned Hospitalization due to Cardiovascular Reasons Any in-hospital stay over one date change due to cardiovascular reason, which includes worsening of HF, acute coronary syndrome, cerebrovascular accidents, or other cardiovascular events, and not planned by the investigator. In case the hospitalization is classified as planned by the investigator, and the time interval between the decision to hospitalize and the hospitalization is less than 24 hours, the End Point and Adverse Event Committee will give final classification concerning planned or unplanned.
From randomization until completion of the planned follow-up, up to 36 months
Total number of worsening heart failure events and cardiovascular deaths
Time Frame: From randomization until completion of the planned follow-up, up to 36 months
From randomization until completion of the planned follow-up, up to 36 months
Change in quality of life - KCCQ score
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months, 12 months
KCCQ is a 23-item, self-administered instrument that quantifies physical function, symptoms (frequency, severity and recent change), social function, self-efficacy and knowledge, and quality of life. The KCCQ Total Symptom Score incorporates the symptom domains into a single score. Scores are transformed to a range of 0-100, in which higher scores reflect better health status.
Baseline, 3 months, 12 months
Change in quality of life - MLWHFQ
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months, 12 months
The Mayo AF-Specific Symptom Inventory (MAFSI) is a questionnaire comprised of a 10-item AF symptom checklist that asked about both the frequency and severity of each symptom. MAFSI frequency of symptoms over the past month was recorded as 0 (never), 1 (rarely), 2 (sometimes), 3 (often), and 4 (always) for each of the 10 items listed in the questionnaire. The 10 item responses were summed for a total Frequency Score that ranged from 0 (no AF symptoms) to 40 (worst score).
Baseline, 3 months, 12 months
Change in 6-minute walk test from baseline to Month 3 and Month 12
Time Frame: Baseline, 3months, 12 months
The 6-minute walk test is a sub-maximal exercise test used to assess aerobic capacity and endurance.
Baseline, 3months, 12 months
Change in H2FPEF score from baseline to Month 3 and Month 12
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months, 12 months
The H2FPEF score is a clinical scoring system used to assess the likelihood of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) in patients with suspected heart failure. It helps in differentiating HFpEF from other causes of dyspnea. The total score ranges from 0 to 5, with higher scores indicating a greater likelihood of HFpEF.
Baseline, 3 months, 12 months
Change in NYHA class from baseline to Month 3, 6 and 12
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months, 12 months
NYHA class is a widely used system for assessing the functional status and severity of heart failure symptoms in patients, with NYHA class IV being the worst.
Baseline, 3 months, 12 months
Change in atrial fibrillation burden
Time Frame: Baseline, 12 months
Atrial fibrillation burden refers to the amount of time that a person with atrial fibrillation spends in an irregular heart rhythm over a specific period, using a Holter monitor.
Baseline, 12 months
Time to Atrial Fibrillation recurrence (RFCA arm)
Time Frame: From randomization until completion of the planned follow-up, up to 36 months
A 30-second episode of AF in ablation group following the 90 day blanking period, confirmed through blinded review by an ECG Core Lab Committee was used for defining the endpoint of recurrent AF.
From randomization until completion of the planned follow-up, up to 36 months
Change in N-terminal pro-B type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) from baseline to Month 3 and Month 12
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months, 12 months
Elevated levels of NT-pro BNP are indicative of increased cardiac stress and can help in the diagnosis, assessment, and monitoring of heart failure.
Baseline, 3 months, 12 months
Time to change of diuretics
Time Frame: From randomization until completion of the planned follow-up, up to 36 months

Based on status of baseline diuretics, the intention to treat population will be divided into patients with baseline diuretics and patients without.

For patients without the usage of baseline diuretics, the outcome of changes in diuretics is the initiation of diuretics during the follow-up period.

For patients without the usage of baseline diuretics, the outcomes including:

  1. permanent discontinuation;
  2. escalation defined as increased dosage, iv fused diuretic or combination with another diuretic;
  3. de-escalation (including permanent discontinuation or decrease in dosage); Changes in diuretic therapy are analyzed in a time-to-first event fashion using a multivariable Cox regression model to obtain hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).
From randomization until completion of the planned follow-up, up to 36 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 6, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

November 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

November 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 13, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 5, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

November 9, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

December 11, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 5, 2023

Last Verified

December 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Atrial Fibrillation

Clinical Trials on Radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA)

3
Subscribe