- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06149377
Impact of a Predictive Model on Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Initially Lymph Node-positive, HER2-positive Breast Cancer
December 6, 2023 updated by: Chuan Wang, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital
Application of a Predictive Model on Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Initially Lymph Node-positive, HER2-positive Breast Cancer After Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy: a Multicenter Retrospective Study
The aim of the study was to develop and validate a nomogram to assess axillary pathological complete response (pCR) in patients with initially lymph node-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer and test its performance in guiding patient selection for sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) following neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NST).
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients from Fujian Medical University Union Hospital (n = 386) as the training cohort and those from Fujian Cancer Hospital, Zhangzhou Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, and No. 900 Hospital of The Joint Logistic Support Force (n = 211) as an external validation cohort from April 1, 2012, to March 31, 2022.
Additionally, 119 patients were enrolled as the test cohort to assess the predictive power of the model from May 1, 2022, to May 31, 2023.The inclusion criteria included: 1) histologically proven primary breast cancer without distant metastatic lesions, 2) HER2-positive status (defined as immunohistochemistry (IHC) of 3+ overexpression or 2+ expression, and a ratio of ≥ 2.0 by fluorescence in situ hybridization), 3) initial axillary lymph node-positive status confirmed using core- or fine-needle biopsy before NST, 4) a full course of standard neoadjuvant therapy before surgery, and 5) complete clinicopathological characteristics and treatment information.
The study was approved by ethics committee of Fujian Medical University Union Hospital.
All patients in the training and validation cohorts underwent mastectomy, breast-conserving surgery, radiation, and ALND surgery after completing NST.
All patients in the additional independent cohort underwent SLNB followed by ALND, which detected at least 2 SLNs using methylene blue dye alone.
SLNs were defined as blue-stained lymph nodes guided directly by blue-stained lymphatic vessels.
Methylene blue dye was injected alone at peritumoral or subareolar sites 5-15 min before SLNB.
After constructing the nomogram for predicting axillary pCR with the independent predictive factors, the investigators quantified the predictive performance of the model using the AUC of the receiver operating characteristic curve.
Calibration plots with bootstrapping and the Hosmer-Lemeshow test were used to illustrate the calibration power of the model, with p > 0.05 indicating a good fit.20
The clinical utility of the model in guiding surgical options was evaluated using decision curve analysis by plotting net benefits.21
Internal validation was estimated using the bootstrap method.
The investigators validated the nomogram using an external validation cohort from the other institutions.
Following the Youden index, the investigators selected an optimal cutoff probability of predicting axillary pCR as a stratification criterion for identifying patients who underwent SLNB surgery after NST.
The investigators additionally examined 119 patients who underwent SLNB with ≥ 2 SLNs removed, followed by ALND, as an independent cohort to evaluate the effect of the nomogram on identifying patients accurately.
FNRs of SLNB were compared using two different strategies: performing SLNB in all patients without any selection criteria and performing SLNB in patients selected by the nomogram with the cutoff probability of axillary pCR.
These results were compared with those of the two previous tests.
Study Type
Observational
Enrollment (Actual)
716
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Fujian
-
Fuzhou, Fujian, China, 350001
- Chuan Wang
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Child
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
N/A
Sampling Method
Non-Probability Sample
Study Population
The investigators retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 597 patients at four institutions from April 1, 2012, to May 30, 2022.
Patients from institution 1 (n = 386) served as the training cohort, whereas those from the other institutions (n = 211) served as an external validation cohort.
A test cohort (n=119) who accepted SLNB followed ALND was collected to assess the predictive power of the model ,from June 1,2022 to We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients from Fujian Medical University Union Hospital (n = 386) as the training cohort and those from Fujian Cancer Hospital, Zhangzhou Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, and No. 900 Hospital of The Joint Logistic Support Force (n = 211) as an external validation cohort from April 1, 2012, to March 31, 2022.
Additionally, 119 patients were enrolled as the test cohort to assess the predictive power of the model from May 1, 2022, to May 31, 2023.
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- histologically proven primary breast cancer without distant metastatic lesions,
- HER2-positive status (defined as immunohistochemistry (IHC) of 3+ overexpression or 2+ expression, and a ratio of ≥ 2.0 by fluorescence in situ hybridization),
- initial axillary lymph node-positive status confirmed using core- or fine-needle biopsy before NST,
- a full course of standard neoadjuvant therapy before surgery
- complete clinicopathological characteristics and treatment information.
Exclusion Criteria:
- do not plan or are unable to operate;
- with distant metastasis
- do not accept full cycles or standard neoadjuvant systemic therapy
- loss of clinicopathological characteristics and treatment information.
- with serious cardiopulmonary diseases, uncontrolled infectious diseases and other non-tumor related diseases who could not tolerate comprehensive treatment such as surgery and chemotherapy
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / Cohort |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Training cohort
Patients (n=386) who accepted neoadjuvant systemic therapy followed surgery were from fujian medical university union hospital from April 1, 2012, to May 30, 2022.
|
|
|
External validation cohort
Patients (n=211) who accepted neoadjuvant systemic therapy followed surgery were from Fujian Cancer Hospital, Zhangzhou Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University and No. 900 Hospital of The Joint Logistic Support Force from April 1, 2012, to May 30, 2022.
|
|
|
Test cohort
Patients (n=119) who accepted sentinel lymph node biopsy followed axillary lymph node dissection after neoadjuvant systemic therapy was retrospectively collected from June 1,2022 to May 31, 2023.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Axillary pCR
Time Frame: 10 years
|
the percent of patients who achieved axillary pathological complete response after NST.
|
10 years
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
the False Negative Rate of SLNB
Time Frame: 12 months
|
the percent of patients with residual lymph node disease were not identified.
|
12 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: China Fujian, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
April 1, 2012
Primary Completion (Actual)
May 31, 2023
Study Completion (Actual)
May 31, 2023
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
November 4, 2023
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
November 25, 2023
First Posted (Actual)
November 29, 2023
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
December 13, 2023
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
December 6, 2023
Last Verified
December 1, 2023
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- NSFFP-2023Y0020
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.