Feasibility Study of a VoRo UrologIc ScaffolD (ARID) (ARID)

March 3, 2025 updated by: Levee Medical, Inc.

Feasibility Study of a VoRo UrologIc ScaffolD for the Prophylactic Treatment of Post-Prostatectomy Stress Urinary Incontinence

The objective of this study is to evaluate the safety and performance of the Voro Urologic Scaffold as a prophylactic treatment for post-prostatectomy stress urinary incontinence.

The study is a prospective, multicenter, single arm study. Up to 40 subjects will be treated at up to 3 investigational sites in Panama. Subjects will be followed up post-treatment at catheter removal, 6 weeks post prostatectomy, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months and 2 years.

Study Overview

Status

Active, not recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Approximately 300,000 men undergo radical prostatectomy (RP) worldwide for the treatment of prostate cancer. RP has favorable oncology outcomes but carries risks of erectile dysfunction and urinary incontinence. Urinary incontinence after RP has negatively affects patient quality of life.

The bioresorbable Voro Urologic Scaffold is designed to be placed over the anastomotic site during an RP procedure, between the bladder neck and urethral stump, to constrain the urethra immediately proximal to the urinary sphincter. The device is designed to relieve the load on the urinary sphincter. As the anastomosis heals, connective tissues form in the scaffold geometry while the scaffold material resorbs and hence potentially reduce the risk of acute and chronic stress incontinence.

The objective of this study is to evaluate the safety and performance of the Voro Urologic Scaffold as a prophylactic treatment for post-prostatectomy stress urinary incontinence.

The study is a prospective, multicenter, single arm study. Up to 40 subjects will be treated at up to 3 investigational sites in Panama. Subjects will be followed up post-treatment at catheter removal, 6 weeks post prostatectomy, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months and 2 years.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

40

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Punta Pacifica
      • Panama City, Punta Pacifica, Panama
        • National Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Male 45-70 years of age
  2. Diagnosed with prostate cancer and scheduled for radical prostatectomy
  3. Gleason Grade Group 3 or lower
  4. Prostate size less than 80 grams
  5. Able and willing to provide written consent to participate in the study
  6. Able and willing to comply with study follow-up visits and procedures

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Malignant tumors outside of the prostate capsule confirmed via baseline assessments (e.g., mpMRI, bone scan)
  2. History of urinary incontinence, including stress or urge urinary incontinence
  3. On medications to treat overactive bladder (OAB)
  4. Post void residual >200 ml or > 25% voiding volume
  5. Presence of urethral stricture or bladder neck contracture
  6. Current or chronic urinary tract infection
  7. Prior urologic outlet surgical or minimally invasive procedure (e.g., TURP, HoLEP, Rezum, etc.).
  8. Prior pelvic radiation or anticipated need for radiation after radical prostatectomy
  9. Presence of stones in the bladder
  10. History of neurogenic bladder, sphincter abnormalities, or poor detrusor muscle function
  11. Body mass index >35
  12. Insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus
  13. Current uncontrolled diabetes (i.e., hemoglobin A1c ≥7.5%)
  14. Intravesical prostatic protrusion (IPP) >5mm
  15. History of immunosuppressive conditions (e.g., AIDS, post-transplant)
  16. Any significant medical history that would pose an unreasonable risk or make the subject unsuitable for the study per investigator discretion
  17. Any cognitive or psychiatric condition that interferes with or precludes direct and accurate communication with the study investigator regarding the study or affect the ability to complete the study quality of life questionnaires
  18. Subject currently participating in other investigational studies unless approved by the Sponsor in writing

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Voro Urologic Scaffold Group

Subjects undergo radical prostatectomy procedure as part of their stand of care treatment for their prostate cancer. The Voro Urologic Scaffold is placed during the prostatectomy procedure after prostate removal. The device is placed over the urethral stump in its compressed configuration. With the device compressed at the pelvic floor, the urethral stump is anastomosed with the bladder neck. The device is expanded and positioned over the anastomosed urethra and bladder neck. The distal end of the device is sutured in place and the proximal end of the device is sutured to the bladder.

The time of Voro Urologic Scaffold insertion and time of completion of device placement (i.e., final sutures placed) will be recorded.

Incision closure will proceed per institution standard of care for the radical prostatectomy procedure.

radical prostatectomy

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The change in pad weight of 24-hour pad weight test from baseline to post procedure 6-month and 12-month follow-ups.
Time Frame: Baseline, Foley removal (about 2-week post procedure), 6-week, and 3-, 6-, 12- & 24-months follow-ups.
The pads are pre-weighed prior to providing them to subjects. The test should be started with an empty bladder. The subject will wear pads and perform their normal daily activities for 24 hours.
Baseline, Foley removal (about 2-week post procedure), 6-week, and 3-, 6-, 12- & 24-months follow-ups.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The change in pad weight of 1-hour pad weight test from baseline to post procedure 6-month and 12-month follow-ups.
Time Frame: Baseline, post-procedure 6-week, and 3-, 6-, 12- & 24-months follow-ups.

The 1-hour pad test follows a standard protocol. Prior to the 1-hour test, the subject is asked to ensure he is adequately hydrated. This will be determined by the color of the urine during the voiding prior to the start of the test. The urine must be clear or light yellow in color to start the test. If the urine is dark yellow, the subject should be given fluids to drink until the urine is light yellow or close to colorless (proper hydration).

If voiding is urgent and unavoidable, the test is terminated. Collect voiding volume and repeat the test after re-hydration.

Baseline, post-procedure 6-week, and 3-, 6-, 12- & 24-months follow-ups.
The changes in the standing cough test (SCT) from baseline to post procedure 6-month and 12-month follow-ups.
Time Frame: Baseline, post-procedure 6-week, and 3-, 6-, 12- & 24-months follow-ups.
The subject must verbally confirm that they have not voided for at least 60 minutes prior to the examination. Examination of the urethral meatus is performed while the subject performs four forceful coughs. Towels or pads are held several inches from the meatus during coughs to collect any urinary leakage. Leakage is evaluated using the Male Stress Incontinence Grading Scale (MSIGS).
Baseline, post-procedure 6-week, and 3-, 6-, 12- & 24-months follow-ups.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Bruce Choi, Founder and CTO, Levee Medical, Inc

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 3, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

July 30, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

October 30, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 8, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 16, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

February 23, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 3, 2025

Last Verified

March 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stress Urinary Incontinence

Clinical Trials on Voro Urologic Scaffold

Subscribe