Comparison of Absorbance Values, Sensory Evaluations and Periodontal Effects of Five Different Products for Clean Aligners Cleansing

February 1, 2026 updated by: Andrea Scribante, University of Pavia

Comparison of Absorbance Values, Sensory Evaluations and Periodontal Effects of Five Different Products for Clean Aligners Cleansing: Randomized Clinical Trial

The aim of the study is to evaluate the most efficient product for the cleaning of Invisalign® clear aligners (Align Technology Inc., San Jose, CA, USA) through objective and subjective assessments after the use of 5 different products. For each aligner, one product is used for 2 weeks until all of them are used, therefore 5 different aligners are required for the study. A periodontal evaluation is conducted to assess variations during the time frame of the study.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This randomized clinical trial aims to evaluate the efficacy of 5 different products for the cleansing of Invisalign® clear aligners among the followings:

  1. drinking water;
  2. dish soap Svelto (Unilever Italia Mkt operations S.r.l.; Roma, IT);
  3. Polident Antibacterial Denture Cleaner (GlaxoSmithKline; Philadelphia, Pa, USA);
  4. Cleaning Crystals Invisalign® (Align Technology, Inc.; San Jose, CA, USA);
  5. Geldis (Kalipharm S.r.l., Alba, IT).

Patients that will sign the informed consent will be enrolled for the study; parents will sign the consent for underage patients.

2 week before the beginning of the orthodontic treatment with Invisalign clear aligners, a professional manual and mechanical removal of supragingival and subgingival deposits of both arches will be performed. At the baseline (T0), the first aligner will be delivered to the patient, that must wear it for 22/24 h except for meals and oral hygiene procedures. One of the 5 cleaning product will be randomly assigned to the patient and toothbrush with silicone bristles (Kalipharm S.r.l., Alba, IT) will be given the cleaning procedures. Patients will be asked to fill in a questionnaire for the subjective appreciation on the cleaning material: the questionnaire presents 19 items evaluating organoleptic and visual characteristics of the aligners and the ease of use of the cleaning method after the first use, after 1 and after 2 weeks. After 2 weeks (T1), patient will be visited again: the questionnaire will be collected, together with the aligner, and a periodontal evaluation on the Ramfjiord teeth will be performed using the following indices: Plaque Index (PI), Bleeding on Probing (BoP), Probing Pocket Depth (PPD), (Gingival Index), BEWE (Basic Erosive Wear Examination), Schiff Air Index. After that, another questionnaire and the following aligner will be given to the patient, another cleaning product will be randomly assigned and another toothbrush will be given. The procedure will be repeated for the following 2 (T2), 4 (T3), 6 (T4) and 8 weeks (T5) until all the cleaning products are tested. All the products will be masked.

JASCO V-750 spectrophotometer (Jasco Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) will be used to evaluate adsorbance for each aligner after the application of the cleaning products. A control value will be calculated using a new clean aligner. The spectrophotometer calculates reflectance values that will be converted in adsorbance values.

Sample size

Sample size was calculated with the following assumptions: ability to detect a clinically relevant difference of 0.0265 in the adsorbance of the clear aligner (primary outcome) of the five groups with an alfa = 0.05 and power = 80%. The assumptions were based on findings of a previous study, with an expected value of 0.190 and a standard deviation of 0.03 for the first group after 2 weeks. Therefore, 20 aligners per each cleaning method were required for the study.

Statistical analysis Statistical analysis will be conducted with R software (R version 3.1.3, R Development Core Team, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Wien, Austria).

For each variable, Significance for all statistical tests will be predetermined at P<0.05.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

20

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Lombardy
      • Pavia, Lombardy, Italy, 27100
        • Unit of Orthodontics and Pediatric Dentistry - Section of Dentistry - Department of Clinical, Surgical, Diagnostic and Pediatrics - University of Pavia

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients undergoing orthodontic treatment with Invisalign® clear aligners.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Failing to follow cleaning method instructions
  • Failing to fill in the questionnaires

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Basic Science
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Water
The product is masked in a spraying bottle without any labels. Once a day, for 14 days, the patient sprays the product on the aligner before cleaning it with a soft bristle toothbrush for 1 minute. Afterward, the aligner is rinsed under fresh running water.
Active Comparator: Dish soap
the product is masked in a transparent bottle without any labels. Once a day, for 14 days, the patient puts the product on the aligner before cleaning it with a soft bristle toothbrush for 1 minute. Afterward, the aligner is rinsed under fresh running water.
Active Comparator: Polident Antibacterial Denture Cleaner®
the product is masked by deleting all labels on the packaging with a black permanent marker. Once a day, for 14 days, the patient dissolves the tablet in a glass full of warm water (30-35 °C), then the aligner is placed inside it for 5 minutes. Afterward the aligner is rinsed under fresh running water.
Active Comparator: Invisalign Cleaning Crystals®
the product is masked by deleting all labels on the packaging with a black permanent marker. Once a day, for 14 days, the patient dissolves the crystals in a glass full of warm water (30-35 °C) mixing with a spoon for 20 seconds; then, the aligner is placed inside the glass for 15 minutes. Afterward, the aligner is rinsed under fresh running water.
Active Comparator: Geldis®
the product is masked by deleting all labels on the packaging with a black permanent marker. Once a day, for 14 days, the patient puts the product on the aligner before cleaning it with a soft toothbrush for 1 minute. Afterward, the aligner is rinsed under fresh running water.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in adsorbance (A) value
Time Frame: Baseline (T0) and after 14 days from baseline (T1)
The changes in adsorbance values evaluated with a spectrophotometer.
Baseline (T0) and after 14 days from baseline (T1)
Changes in patient's perception
Time Frame: Baseline (T0) and after 14 days from baseline (T1)

Through a questionnaire, a subjective evaluation is carried out as regards:

  • the patient's perception of the ease of use of the five products;
  • the difference perceived by the patient in terms of subjective changes in color, smell, taste, cleanness and tactile sensation after the first use, after a week and after 2 weeks of the cleaning method.

For each of the 19 questions, a mark from 0 (worse mark) to 10 (best mark) will be provided.

Baseline (T0) and after 14 days from baseline (T1)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes in Probing Pocket Depth (PPD) values
Time Frame: Baseline (T0) and after 14 days from baseline (T1)
PPD is evaluated with a periodontal probe on the facial and lingual surfaces of the Ramfjord teeth in three sites: distal, central and mesial.
Baseline (T0) and after 14 days from baseline (T1)
Changes in Gingival Index (GI) values
Time Frame: Baseline (T0) and after 14 days from baseline (T1)

Site-specific assessment of the presence or absence of gingival inflammation.

Scoring criteria:

  • 0: absence of inflammation;
  • 1: mild inflammation;
  • 2: moderate inflammation;
  • 3: severe inflammation.
Baseline (T0) and after 14 days from baseline (T1)
Changes in Bleeding on probing (BOP)
Time Frame: Baseline (T0) and after 14 days from baseline (T1)
Site-specific assessment of the presence or absence of gum bleeding after the insertion of the periodontal probe for the detection of PPD, detected on 4 sites (mesial, distal, vestibular, palatal/lingual).
Baseline (T0) and after 14 days from baseline (T1)
Change in Schiff Air Index - Dental sensitivity test
Time Frame: Baseline (T0) and after 14 days from baseline (T1)

Scoring criteria:

  • 0: the subject did not respond to air blasting;
  • 1: the subject responded to air blasting;
  • 2: the subject responded to air blasting and requested discontinuation;
  • 3: the subject responded to air blasting, requested discontinuation and considered the stimulus to be painful.
Baseline (T0) and after 14 days from baseline (T1)
Change of the BEWE Index Basic Erosive Wear Examination
Time Frame: Baseline (T0) and after 14 days from baseline (T1)

Scoring criteria:

  • 0: no erosive tooth wear;
  • 1: initial loss of surface texture;
  • 2: distinct defect, hard tissue loss < 50% of the surface area;
  • 3: hard tissue loss ≥ 50% of the surface area.
Baseline (T0) and after 14 days from baseline (T1)
Change in plaque index (PI):
Time Frame: Baseline (T0) and after 14 days from baseline (T1)

Site specific assessment of the amount of plaque on dental surfaces; it is detected on facial and lingual surfaces of the Ramfjord teeth.

Scoring criteria:

  • 0: absence of plaque;
  • 1: plaque revealed on probing;
  • 2: visible layer of plaque on the tooth surface;
  • 3: abundant plaque on tooth surface. Results indicate the index as a percentage.
Baseline (T0) and after 14 days from baseline (T1)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Andrea Scribante, DDS, PhD, University of Pavia

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 28, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

July 30, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 18, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 23, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

February 26, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 4, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 1, 2026

Last Verified

February 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2024-ALIGNERSCLEANSIGN

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Data will be available upon motivated request to the Principal Investigator.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Dental Malocclusion

Clinical Trials on Aligners cleansing with water

Subscribe