- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06352814
Activities-based Locomotor Training Program Versus Traditional Physical Therapy in Children With Cerebral Palsy
July 15, 2025 updated by: Megan Flores, Baylor University
Impact of an Activities-based Locomotor Training Program Versus Traditional Physical Therapy in Children With Cerebral Palsy on Activity, Participation, and Neurophysiological Adaptations
The purpose of this study is to investigate the impact of an intensive activities-based locomotor training program as compared to traditional physical therapy on activity, participation, and central and peripheral neurophysiological adaptation in children with cerebral palsy.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Observational research will be performed to assess the change in outcome measure scores over time among participants after the AB-LT intervention.
Outcome measures will be obtained 4 times, occurring every 3 weeks over a period of 9 weeks: pre-intervention, post-intervention, pre-traditional therapy, and post-traditional therapy.
A washout period of 3 weeks will occur between the AB-LT intervention and traditional therapy.
Study Type
Observational
Enrollment (Actual)
6
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Texas
-
Waco, Texas, United States, 76798
- Baylor University
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Child
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
N/A
Sampling Method
Non-Probability Sample
Study Population
Community sample (central Texas)
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Diagnosis of CP
- Between the ages of 2 to 12 years.
- Enrolled in a 3-week AB-LT program and/or participate in traditional physical therapy.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Surgery or botulinum toxin injections in the previous 6 months
- Uncontrolled epilepsy or cardiovascular disease.
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / Cohort |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
ABLT vs traditional PT
Activities-based locomotor training is implemented through a combination of partial body weight supported treadmill training, overground walking, and play-based activities.
|
AB-LT is implemented through a combination of partial body weight supported treadmill training, overground walking, and play-based activities.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Gross Motor Function Measure-66 (GMFM)
Time Frame: 9 weeks
|
Gross Motor Function Measure-66: Items scored on 0-3 scale.
Minimum value: 0. Maximum value: 99.
Higher scores indicate better outcome.
|
9 weeks
|
|
Pediatric Neuromuscular Recovery Scale (PedsNRS)
Time Frame: 9 weeks
|
Pediatric Neuromuscular Recovery Scale: Each of the 13 items on the Peds NRS have 12 phases.
Each item is scored on a 12-point scale, with one point allocated to each phase of the item.
The age-appropriate item cards instruct the rater to begin at a designated "start phase" indicated by a bold box around the phase within the 12 phases on each card.
If the child cannot perform the movement as listed in the start phase (which may be midway through the card), the rater starts at the beginning of the item card and assesses the child's performance at the first phase for that item.
The rater continues sequentially through the 12 phases on the card until the child is unable to perform a phase.
The rater scores the highest phase achieved by the child and moves on to the next item card, through all 13 items.
Items are then summed into a summary Peds NRS score using an algorithm.
|
9 weeks
|
|
Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory (PEDI-CAT)
Time Frame: 9 weeks
|
Parent questionnaire about child's mobility and activitiies of daily living.
Normative Standard Scores: provided as age percentiles and T-scores Scaled Scores (criterion scores): 20-80 scale.
|
9 weeks
|
|
Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory CP Module (PedsQL-CP)
Time Frame: 9 weeks
|
For each of the 4 domains, in addition to scaled scores, normative standard scores (provided as T-scores and age percentiles) are calculated.
Normative scores describe the child's performance in comparison to other children of the same age (in one year intervals).
For T-scores, the mean for each age group is 50, with a standard deviation of 10 (same format used for normative scores in the original PEDI).
Typically, T-scores between 30 and 70 (i.e.
mean ± 2 standard deviations) are considered within the expected range for age.
Scores below 30 indicate decreased functional ability compared to what is typically expected for that age range.
Scores above 70 indicate scores above what is typically expected for that age range.
Higher scores indicate better outcome.
|
9 weeks
|
|
Functional near-infrared spectroscopy
Time Frame: 9 weeks
|
Non-invasive, continuous wave functional near-infrared spectroscopy using an OctaMon+ (Artinis Medical Systems, Lieden, Netherlands) to track oxygenation status.
|
9 weeks
|
|
Electromyography
Time Frame: 9 weeks
|
Electrodes will measure electrical activity in response to reflex stimulation of the muscle of the dominant limbs.
|
9 weeks
|
|
ActiGraph sensors
Time Frame: 9 weeks
|
Activity performance will be measured using ActiGraph accelerometers, which are motion sensors worn as a bracelet around the rist designed to detect movement when worn.
They have excellent inter-instrument reliability (ICC = 0.98).
Physical activity data will be expressed in average counts per minute (CPM) on the basis of the vector magnitude of the triaxial accelerometer.
In general, higher average CPM represents a more active child.
|
9 weeks
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Megan Flores, Baylor University
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
March 8, 2024
Primary Completion (Actual)
June 30, 2025
Study Completion (Actual)
June 30, 2025
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
March 25, 2024
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
April 1, 2024
First Posted (Actual)
April 8, 2024
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
July 18, 2025
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
July 15, 2025
Last Verified
July 1, 2025
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 1977152
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
NO
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Cerebral Palsy
-
Ankara City Hospital BilkentRecruitingCerebral Palsy (CP) | Cerebral Palsy, Spastic, Diplegic | Diplegic Cerebral Palsy With Spasticity | Transcranial Magnetic StimilationTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Lahore University of Biological and Applied SciencesRecruiting
-
Suleyman Demirel UniversityCompletedCerebral Palsy | Hemiplegic Cerebral Palsy | Spastic Diplegia Cerebral PalsyTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation HospitalCanadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)RecruitingCerebral Palsy (CP) | Hemiplegic Cerebral PalsyCanada
-
Cairo UniversityCompletedCerebral Palsy (CP) | Unilateral Cerebral PalsyEgypt
-
University of California, San FranciscoNot yet recruitingCerebral Palsy | Cerebral Palsy (CP) | Infant | Cerebral Palsy InfantileUnited States
-
Lahore University of Biological and Applied SciencesNot yet recruitingSpastic Diplegia Cerebral PalsyPakistan
-
IRCCS Fondazione Stella MarisNot yet recruitingCerebral Palsy (CP) | EEG | Unilateral Cerebral Palsy | Action ObservationItaly
-
IRCCS Fondazione Stella MarisUniversity of Siena, ItalyRecruitingCerebral Palsy (CP) | Motor Imagery | CP (Cerebral Palsy) | Action ObservationItaly
-
University of LahoreCompletedCerebral Palsy (CP) | Spastic Diplegia Cerebral Palsy | Balance | Gross Motor FunctionsPakistan
Clinical Trials on Activities-based locomotor training (physical therapy)
-
Baylor UniversityEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development...RecruitingCerebral Palsy (CP)United States
-
Baylor UniversityCompletedCerebral PalsyUnited States
-
University of FloridaBaylor College of Medicine; The Craig H. Neilsen Foundation; Brooks RehabilitationCompletedSpinal Cord Injury (SCI)United States
-
University of LouisvilleEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development...Completed
-
Riphah International UniversityCompleted
-
US Department of Veterans AffairsCompletedSeated Treadmill Training | Treadmill Locomotor-based Training | Treadmill OnlyUnited States
-
Alon RabinMedical Corps, Israel Defense ForceRecruiting
-
University of North Carolina, Chapel HillPatient-Centered Outcomes Research InstituteCompletedKnee OsteoarthritisUnited States
-
University of Maryland, BaltimoreShepherd Center, Atlanta GACompletedSpinal Cord InjuryUnited States
-
Bilgehan Tekin DalCompleted