Apprehension-based Training Compared With Standard Physical Therapy for Military Personnel Following Anterior Shoulder Dislocation - a Randomized Clinical Trial

June 2, 2025 updated by: Alon Rabin

Apprehension-based Training Compared With Standard Physical Therapy Among Military Personnel Following Anterior Shoulder Dislocation

The goal of this clinical trial is to determine if a new rehabilitation protocol (apprehension-based training), leads to better recovery after shoulder dislocation among military personnel.

Participants will be randomly allocated to apprehension-based training or standard physical therapy. In apprehension-based training participants will train to control their shoulder under progressively more unstable conditions. Standard physical therapy will be provided based on the clinical judgment of the treating physical therapist The primary hypothesis is that participants undergoing apprehension-based training will experience a more complete recovery of function, better shoulder-related quality of life, and incur less recurrent dislocations.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

85

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Be'er Ya'akov, Israel, 7030732
        • Recruiting
        • Israel Defense Forces Medical Corps
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Netanel Hollander, MS, PT

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 18-39 years
  • Shoulder dislocation (primary or recurrent) documented by a medical practitioner (physician, military medic)
  • Positive anterior apprehension test
  • Gross shoulder muscle strength 3/5 or greater

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previous shoulder fracture, tendon tear, or shoulder surgery
  • Voluntary shoulder dislocation
  • Functional (Stanmore polar III) shoulder instability
  • Dislocation associated with a motor vehicle accident.
  • Diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis, cancer (current), fibromyalgia, psychiatric disease)
  • Current pregnancy
  • Inability to attend at least one physical therapy session every 2 weeks.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Apprehension-based training
Apprehension-based training is a 3-phase exercise intervention intended to expose patients to progressively increased shoulder apprehension-provoking conditions. Patients progress from one phase to the other upon completion of the previous level of exercise

This intervention is comprised of the 3 phases:

Static phase - Isometric (static) exercises performed in progressively greater shoulder apprehension ("instability") provoking conditions Dynamic phase: Isotonic (dynamic) exercises using shoulder apprehension-provoking movement patterns at a gradually increasing pace of movement.

Neurocognitive phase: Dynamic phase exercises are continued at a high pace with the addition of cognitive tasks ("distractions").

The intervention is guided by a physical therapist and includes up to 8 individual (one on one) sessions. In each session the physical therapist assesses exercise performance quality and when appropriate progresses exercise intensity and/or phase. Patients are expected to perform home exercises according to their phase of the program on a daily basis in between physical therapy sessions.

Active Comparator: Standard physical therapy
Standard physical therapy will be provided by a licensed physical therapist and may include exercises of different kinds, manual therapy, dry needling or electrophysiological modalities.
Standard physical will be provided based on the assessment and judgment of the physical therapist. Intervention may include active exercises for increased shoulder mobility, muscle strength and neuromuscular control. Intervention may also include manual therapies such as massage, soft-tissue and joint mobilizations, dry needling, and electrophysiological modalities. No more than 8 individual sessions with a physical therapist will be provided over the course of treatment with some form of a home exercise program in between.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Return to preinjury level of function
Time Frame: 3 months following the end of intervention
Patient's ability to resume their preinjury military and overall level of function will be assessed separately through a telephone interview 3 months after the end of their assigned intervention. This outcome will be rated dichotomously: "Yes" (have resumed my preinjury military/overall level of function), or "No" (have not been able to resume my preinjury military/overall level of function).
3 months following the end of intervention
Recurrence
Time Frame: One year following the end of the intervention
Recurrent events of instability, either in the form of a frank dislocation or a sensation of instability (subluxation) will be assessed through a telephone interview.
One year following the end of the intervention
Supine moving apprehension test
Time Frame: Baseline to end of intervention (10 weeks)
Dynamic stability will be assessed with the supine moving apprehension test. This is a functional performance test in which the patient is asked to repeatedly move the shoulder into 135- and 180-degrees of abduction from a supine position while holding a dumbbell (2-3 kg). The number of repetitions over one minute comprises the score of the test.
Baseline to end of intervention (10 weeks)
Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index
Time Frame: Baseline to end of intervention (10 weeks) and 1-year follow-up (62 weeks).
The Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index is a self-reported measure of shoulder instability related quality of life. This questionnaire includes 21 items regarding symptoms, activity limitations, quality of life and emotions. Each item is scored on a 100mm visual analogue scale resulting in a total score of 0 - 2100 which can be converted to a percentage with greater scores indicating greater disability.
Baseline to end of intervention (10 weeks) and 1-year follow-up (62 weeks).

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Subjective shoulder value
Time Frame: Baseline, end of intervention (10 weeks), and 1-year follow up (62 weeks)
A patient reported single numeric assessment of shoulder function as a percent of a normal shoulder: "What is the overall percent value of your shoulder if a completely normal shoulder represents 100%?"
Baseline, end of intervention (10 weeks), and 1-year follow up (62 weeks)
Tampa scale of kinesiophobia
Time Frame: Baseline, end of intervention (10 weeks), and 1-year follow-up (62 weeks)
A self-reported 17-item fear of movement and reinjury measure. Each item is scored on a 4-point Likert scale for a total score between 17-68.
Baseline, end of intervention (10 weeks), and 1-year follow-up (62 weeks)
Anterior apprehension test
Time Frame: Baseline to end of intervention (10 weeks)
The sensation of apprehension will be assessed through the anterior apprehension test performed in 4 stages: 1.) shoulder abduction to 90 degrees; 2.) external rotation; 3.) horizontal abduction; 4.) Shoulder abduction beyond 90 degrees. Elicitation of apprehension (verbal, fascial expression, or muscle guarding) will be rated according to the stage at which it occurs (1-4). The test will be rated negative (5) if apprehension is not elicited at any stage.
Baseline to end of intervention (10 weeks)
Shoulder internal/external rotator muscle strength
Time Frame: Baseline and end of intervention (10 weeks)
Shoulder internal and external rotator muscle strength will be assessed using a hand-held dynamometer in a supine-lying position with the shoulder abducted 90 degrees, neutral rotation, and the elbow bent 90 degrees. The examiner will position a hand-held dynamometer over the distal anterior (internal rotator strength) or posterior (external rotator strength) aspect of the forearm and resist a maximal voluntary effort by the patient. two repetitions will be performed for each strength test with the highest value used for data analysis.
Baseline and end of intervention (10 weeks)
Abdominal rollout
Time Frame: Baseline and end of intervention (10 weeks)
From a kneeling position with the hands gripping a barbell loaded with a 5kg plate on each side, the patient will roll forward to the greatest distance possible and return to the starting position. The test will be performed in a narrow (shoulder width) and wide (2x shoulder width) hand grip. Up to 5 repetitions will be allowed to achieve maximum distance in each grip condition.
Baseline and end of intervention (10 weeks)
Heart rate variability
Time Frame: Baseline and end of intervention (10 weeks).
Heart rate variability (HRV) during apprehension provocative and non-apprehension provocative shoulder movements will be measured using a Polar H10 chest strap. Heart rate variability will serve a physiological marker for autonomic nervous system response to movement provoked stress in the context of anterior shoulder dislocation.
Baseline and end of intervention (10 weeks).

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Alon Rabin, PhD, DPT, Ariel University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 5, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 22, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 22, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

December 30, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 4, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 2, 2025

Last Verified

June 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Baseline, final and follow-up self-reported and physical performance outcome measures will be shared electronically.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

1.1.2028-1.1.2029

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Scholars, medical professionals as well as the general public may access outcomes measures data, intervention protocol and statistical analyses upon request from the principal investigator at the URL provided below.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Anterior Shoulder Dislocation

Clinical Trials on Apprehension-based training

Subscribe