Zonisamide Versus Propranolol in Migraine

April 20, 2024 updated by: Mohamed G. zeinhom, MD, Kafrelsheikh University

Zonisamide Versus Propranolol in Migraine, a Randomized Controlled Single-blinded Trial

Investigators aim to compare the effect of zonisamide versus propranolol in migraine by assessing the absolute reduction in MMD in each group, the percentage of patients who achieved ≥ 50% reduction in the monthly headache days frequency compared to the baseline frequency

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

Investigators will enroll 600 migraine patients who are diagnosed according to ICHD3-beta criteria in our study and will use a questionnaire to detect their demographic and clinical features (disease duration, attack frequency, and duration, pain intensity assessed by the visual analogic scale and we have two groups the first group will include 300 patients and will receive 100mg zonisamide daily and Acetaminophen 500-1000 mg in acute attack, and the second group will receive propranolol 160 mg per day and Acetaminophen 500-1000 mg in acute attack for at least three months. Investigators will assess The number of migraine days after three months of treatment and the percentage of patients who achieved ≥ 50% reduction in the monthly headache days frequency compared to the baseline frequency. HIT-6 score reduction in each group after three months of treatment. The safety of lacosamide was evaluated by monitoring and documenting treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAE) in patients through regular follow-up procedures for three months.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

600

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Kafr Ash Shaykh, Egypt, 33511
        • Recruiting
        • Kafr Elsheikh University Hospital
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Naive migraine patients, according to the International Classification of Headache Disorders 3rd edition,
  • age from 10 to 55 years

Exclusion Criteria:

Patients with major neurological disorders such as ( epilepsy, ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke, multiple sclerosis, mitochondrial diseases, brain tumors, and patients with essential tremors.

patients with malignancy, collagen, liver, and renal diseases. patients with cardiovascular diseases like hypertension and diabetes patients with valvular and ischemic heart diseases, bradycardia or heart blocks, congestive heart failure patients who received prophylactic treatment for migraine, patients with any contraindications to drugs used in the study patients with bronchial asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Propranolol and Acetaminophen group
The arm will include 300 migraine patients diagnosed according to ICHD3-beta criteria. All patients will receive propranolol 160 mg once daily and Acetaminophen 500-1000 mg only in acute migraine attacks for 3 months. We will assess The change in migraine days per 28 days, the number of migraine days after three months of treatment, and the percentage of patients who achieved ≥ 50% reduction in the monthly headache days frequency compared to the baseline frequency (14). HIT-6 score reduction in each group after three months of treatment. The safety of lacosamide was evaluated by monitoring and documenting treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAE) in patients through regular follow-up procedures for three months.

The arm will include 300 migraine patients diagnosed according to ICHD3-beta criteria. All patients received propranolol 160 mg daily and acetaminophen 500-1000 mg on migraine attack.

We will assess The change in migraine days per 28 days, the number of migraine days after three months of treatment, and the percentage of patients who achieved ≥ 50% reduction in the monthly headache days frequency compared to the baseline frequency (14). HIT-6 score reduction in each group after three months of treatment. The safety of lacosamide was evaluated by monitoring and documenting treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAE) in patients through regular follow-up procedures for three months.

Other Names:
  • group B
Experimental: zonisamide and Acetaminophen arm
The arm will include 300 migraine patients diagnosed according to ICHD3-beta criteria. All patients will receive zonisamide 50 mg twice daily and Acetaminophen 500-1000 mg only in acute migraine attacks for 3 months. We will assess The change in migraine days per 28 days, the number of migraine days after three months of treatment, and the percentage of patients who achieved ≥ 50% reduction in the monthly headache days frequency compared to the baseline frequency (14). HIT-6 score reduction in each group after three months of treatment. The safety of lacosamide was evaluated by monitoring and documenting treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAE) in patients through regular follow-up procedures for three months.

The arm will include 300 migraine patients diagnosed according to ICHD3-beta criteria. all patients received zonisamide 100 mg daily and acetaminophen 500-1000 mg on migraine attack.

We will assess The change in migraine days per 28 days, the number of migraine days after three months of treatment, and the percentage of patients who achieved ≥ 50% reduction in the monthly headache days frequency compared to the baseline frequency (14). HIT-6 score reduction in each group after three months of treatment. The safety of zonisamide was evaluated by monitoring and documenting treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAE) in patients through regular follow-up procedures for three months.

Other Names:
  • group A

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The change in migraine days per 28 days
Time Frame: 28 days
The investigators will assess the change in migraine days per 28 days in each group.
28 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The percentage of patients who achieved ≥ 50% reduction in the monthly migraine days frequency compared to the baseline frequency.
Time Frame: 3 months
We will assess The percentage of patients who achieved ≥ 50% reduction in the monthly headache days frequency compared to the baseline frequency in each group
3 months
The safety of lacosamide was evaluated by monitoring treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAE) for three months.
Time Frame: 3 months
The safety of zonisamide was evaluated by monitoring and documenting treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAE) in patients through regular follow-up procedures for three months.
3 months
The total number of migraine days after three months of treatment
Time Frame: 3 months
The investigators will assess the total migraine days after three months of regular use of 100 mg zonisamide twice daily and Acetaminophen 500-1000 mg in acute attack or propranolol (160 mg once daily) and Acetaminophen 500-1000 mg in acute attack alone.
3 months
HIT-6 score absolute change in each group after three months of treatment
Time Frame: 3 months
The investigators assessed the absolute reduction in HIT6 score, the Headache Impact Test-6 (HIT-6) assessed the burden of headache in each group; the HIT-6 consists of six items: pain, social functioning, role functioning, vitality, cognitive functioning, and psychological distress, the patient answers each of the six related questions using one of the following five responses: "never", "rarely", "sometimes", "very often," or "always." These responses are summed to produce a total HIT-6 score that ranges from 36 to 78, where a higher score indicates a greater impact of headache on the daily life of the respondent. It has four impact grades: little-to-no impact (HIT-6 score: 36-49), moderate impact (HIT-6 score: 50-55), substantial impact (HIT-6 score: 56-59), and severe impact (HIT-6 score: 60-78)
3 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: mohamed G. Zeinhom, MD, neurology department kafr el-sheikh university

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 29, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

March 30, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

April 20, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 28, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 9, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

April 11, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 23, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 20, 2024

Last Verified

April 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

All the data supporting this research's findings may be available from the principal investigator Mohamed G. Zeinhom upon reasonable request.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Migraine

Clinical Trials on Zonisamide 50 MG

3
Subscribe