- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06410963
ReActivate: Physiotherapist Led Intervention for A Adolescents and Young Adults With Musculoskelatal Pain
April 9, 2026 updated by: Örebro University, Sweden
ReActivate: Physiotherapist Led Intervention for Adolescents and Young Adults With Musculoskeletal Pain; A Sequential Replicated and Randomized Single Case Experimental Design (SCED)
Recurrent or persistent musculoskeletal pain is an alarmingly common problem among adolescents, in Sweden as well as globally.
Pain often co-occur with and psychological distress and have both been shown to be predictors of sustained problems in adulthood.
Adequate treatment early on in the development of problems has been shown important in order to decrease the risk of sustained problems in adulthood but available treatments have only modest effects.
There is thus a need for treatment development, not in the least for (secondary) preventative purposes.
The aim of this project is therefore to develop an evidence based and cost-effective secondary preventative intervention.
Specifically, this project aims to develop and test a physiotherapist led treatment for adolescents with recurrent or persistent musculoskeletal pain and based upon graded exposure to physical activity and reactivation.
Study Overview
Status
Active, not recruiting
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
See description of arms and intervention.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Estimated)
35
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
-
Örebro, Sweden, 70217
- Region Örebro county
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Child
- Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age 12-25
- Persistent (consistently or weekly recurrent) musculoskeletal pain problems for ≥3 months, with pain intensity ≥2 on a numeric rating scale 0-6 (0=not at all, 6=to a great extent)
- Presence of avoidance behaviour and/or or worry about symptoms/problems, ≥1 on a numeric rating scale 0-6 (0=not at all, 6=to a great extent); > 50 on at least one activity of the PHODA.
- Swedish speaking and able to fill out questionnaires
Exclusion Criteria:
- Serious/malignant disease
- Participation in other rehabilitation program
- Severe mental health problems
- Substance abuse
- Severe learning disabilities
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
No Intervention: No treatment waiting period
Participants are randomized to a 7, 14 or 21 day waiting period.
Daily measurements are collected throughout this period.
|
|
|
Experimental: Reactivate
Reactivate treatment.
Daily measurements are collected throughout treatment.
|
The study period is 84 days (12 weeks).
Depending on the length of the baseline period (randomly assigned to be 7, 14 or 21 days), the treatment period varies between 63-77 days and contains 6-11 sessions.
The intervention consists of 2-4 educational sessions in pain mechanisms and fear avoidance and 4-9 sessions of individually tailored intervention with graded exposure and reactivation to avoided physical activities.
Intervention will take place from one time per week to one time every two weeks, 30-60 minutes per session.
Number of treatment sessions will depend on when the individual participants' goals are considered reached.
If necessary, given the participants consent, their legal guardians will be invited to attend the sessions.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Activity engagement change
Time Frame: repeated daily through phase A (randomly assigned to be 7, 14 or 21 days) and treatment phase B (9-11 weeks). Total time frame of assessment is 12 weeks (84 days). 7 days assessment 6 months after terminated intervention
|
Change in self-rated activity engagement.
Numerical Rating Scale, range 0-6 (1 question: lower values, worse outcome, 1 question: Lower values, better outcome )
|
repeated daily through phase A (randomly assigned to be 7, 14 or 21 days) and treatment phase B (9-11 weeks). Total time frame of assessment is 12 weeks (84 days). 7 days assessment 6 months after terminated intervention
|
|
Symptom distress change
Time Frame: repeated daily through phase A (randomly assigned to be 7, 14 or 21 days) and treatment phase B (9-11 weeks). Total time frame of assessment is 12 weeks (84 days). 7 days assessment 6 months after terminated intervention.
|
Change in self-rated distress about symptoms.
Numerical Rating Scale, range 0-6 (3 questions, higher values, worse outcome)
|
repeated daily through phase A (randomly assigned to be 7, 14 or 21 days) and treatment phase B (9-11 weeks). Total time frame of assessment is 12 weeks (84 days). 7 days assessment 6 months after terminated intervention.
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Functional Disability Inventory (FDI) change
Time Frame: baseline, after treatment phase B (12 weeks), 6 months after terminated intervention
|
Change in functional disability.
Descriptive Rating Scale, range 0-64 (higher values, worse outcome)
|
baseline, after treatment phase B (12 weeks), 6 months after terminated intervention
|
|
Center of Epidemiological Studies Depression Scales for Children (CES-DC) change
Time Frame: baseline, after treatment phase B (12 weeks), 6 months after terminated intervention
|
Change in depressive symptoms.
Descriptive Rating Scale, range 0-60 (higher values, worse outcome)
|
baseline, after treatment phase B (12 weeks), 6 months after terminated intervention
|
|
The Pediatric Quality of Life Acute version (PedsQL) PedsQL™
Time Frame: baseline, after treatment phase B (12 weeks), 6 months after terminated intervention
|
Change in quality of life.
Descriptive Rating Scale, range 0-92 (higher values, worse outcome)
|
baseline, after treatment phase B (12 weeks), 6 months after terminated intervention
|
|
Change in psychological distress
Time Frame: repeated daily through phase A (randomly assigned to be 7, 14 or 21 days) and treatment phase B (9-11 weeks). Total time frame of assessment is 12 weeks (84days). 7 days assessment 6 months after terminated assessment.
|
Change in self-related symptoms of psychological distress.
Numerical Rating Scale, range 0-6 (3 questions, higher values, worse outcome)
|
repeated daily through phase A (randomly assigned to be 7, 14 or 21 days) and treatment phase B (9-11 weeks). Total time frame of assessment is 12 weeks (84days). 7 days assessment 6 months after terminated assessment.
|
|
Pain change
Time Frame: repeated daily through phase A (randomly assigned to be 7, 14 or 21 days) and treatment phase B (9-11 weeks). Total time frame of assessment is 12 weeks (84days). 7 days assessment 6 months after terminated assessment.
|
Change in self-related pain symptoms.
Numerical Rating Scale range 0-6 (higher values, worse outcome)
|
repeated daily through phase A (randomly assigned to be 7, 14 or 21 days) and treatment phase B (9-11 weeks). Total time frame of assessment is 12 weeks (84days). 7 days assessment 6 months after terminated assessment.
|
|
Fear of Pain Questionnaire Children Short-form (FOPQ-C SF) change
Time Frame: baseline, after treatment phase B (12 weeks), 6 months after terminated intervention
|
Change in fear of pain.
Descriptiv Rating Scale, range 0-40 (higher values worse outcome)
|
baseline, after treatment phase B (12 weeks), 6 months after terminated intervention
|
|
The Photograph Series of Daily Activities for youth (PHODA) change - short
Time Frame: First session after baseline (randomly assigned to be 7, 14 or 21 days), after treatment phase B (12 weeks)
|
Change in percieved harmfulness.
Photographs with 50 activities, rated on a Subjective Self-rating Scale, range 0-100mm/item (higher values, worse outcome)
|
First session after baseline (randomly assigned to be 7, 14 or 21 days), after treatment phase B (12 weeks)
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Treatment Inventory of Costs in Patients with psychiatric disorders (Tic-P), medical resources
Time Frame: baseline, 12 weeks, 6 months after terminated intervention
|
Change in use of medical resources.
Dichotomous scale completed by open ended answers if answer is yes.
|
baseline, 12 weeks, 6 months after terminated intervention
|
|
Treatment Inventory of Costs in Patients with psychiatric disorders (Tic-P), school absence
Time Frame: baseline, 12 weeks, 6 months after terminated intervention
|
Change in school abcense.
Dichotomous scale completed by open ended answers if answer is yes.
One question is completed by one question with Numerical Rating Scale 1-10 (higher values, worse outcome) if answer is yes.
|
baseline, 12 weeks, 6 months after terminated intervention
|
|
Accelerometer
Time Frame: 7 days of the first week of baseline (randomly assigned to be 7, 14 or 21 days). 7 days assessment 6 months after terminated assessment.
|
Change in physical activity, digital device counting steps
|
7 days of the first week of baseline (randomly assigned to be 7, 14 or 21 days). 7 days assessment 6 months after terminated assessment.
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Katja Boersma, PhD, Örebro University, Sweden
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
September 23, 2024
Primary Completion (Estimated)
November 30, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 1, 2026
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
May 8, 2024
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
May 8, 2024
First Posted (Actual)
May 13, 2024
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
April 14, 2026
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
April 9, 2026
Last Verified
April 1, 2026
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- Reactivate
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
NO
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Chronic Pain
-
University Rovira i VirgiliMinisterio de Ciencia e Innovación, SpainNot yet recruitingChronic Post-operative Pain | Chronic Postsurgical Pain | Chronic Post-surgical Pain | Chronic Postoperative PainSpain
-
Pain ConcernThe Thistle Foundation; Health and Social Care Alliance Scotland (the ALLIANCE) and other collaboratorsCompletedChronic Pain | Chronic Pain Syndrome | Chronic Pain, Widespread | Chronic Pain Due to Trauma | Chronic Pain Due to Malignancy (Finding) | Chronic Pain Due to Injury | Chronic Pain Post-Procedural | Chronic Pain HipUnited Kingdom
-
Washington D.C. Veterans Affairs Medical CenterRecruitingChronic Back Pain | Chronic Pain (back / Neck)United States
-
Bjorn AngKarolinska Institutet; The Swedish Research Council; Göteborg University; Forte; Dalarna...Not yet recruitingPain Management | Pain, Chronic | Chronic Pain, WidespreadSweden
-
The University of Texas Health Science Center,...RecruitingJoint Pain | Chronic Knee Pain | Chronic Pain (Back / Neck) | Chronic Pain ManagementUnited States
-
University of Alabama, TuscaloosaPatient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute; East Carolina University; Whatley...CompletedPain | Chronic Pain | Chronic Pain Syndrome | Widespread Chronic Pain | Chronic Pain Due to InjuryUnited States
-
Dow University of Health SciencesRecruitingLow Back Pain | Chronic Low-back Pain | Low Back Pain, Mechanical | Mechanical Low Back Pain | Pain, Chronic | Pain, Back | Lower Back Pain Chronic | CLBP - Chronic Low Back PainPakistan
-
Massachusetts General HospitalCompletedChronic Low Back Pain | Chronic Neck PainUnited States
-
University of FaisalabadNot yet recruiting
-
Universidade do Vale do ParaíbaCAPES Foundation - Ministry of Education, Brazil.Enrolling by invitationChronic Low Back Pain | Chronic Shoulder Pain | Chronic Knee PainBrazil
Clinical Trials on Reactivate
-
Children's University Hospital, IrelandUniversity of Oxford; University College CorkUnknownObesity | Physical Activity | Psychosocial Problem | Impaired Health | General Nutrition DisorderIreland
-
University of Colorado, DenverNational Cancer Institute (NCI)Withdrawn