Strategies for Adaptive Follow-up and Evaluation - Guiding Use of Indicators for De-Escalation in Multiple Sclerosis (SAFEGUIDE-MS)

July 1, 2024 updated by: Dr. med. Marc Günter Pawlitzki, Heinrich-Heine University, Duesseldorf
The study will attempt to closely analyze Multiple Sclerosis (MS) patients after de-escalating or discontinuation of immunotherapy using clinical monitoring as well as digital and serological biomarkers in order to detect clinical progression or disease activity. As this is an observational study, it aims to closely follow-up on patients where the clinical decision to de-escalate or end treatment has been independently made. Specifically, we want to find out to what extent patients will show increased disease activity after de-escalation/discontinuation from high-efficacy treatment (HET) and which measurement method (clinical, digital, serological) retrospectively reflects the disease activity most closely or detects it most sensitively.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Due to the increasing scientific efforts in recent years, a variety of HET are now available for patients with MS. In addition to long-term clinical assessment, monitoring by means of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has also become increasingly established. No evidence of disease activity under appropriate immunotherapy has thus been defined in a wide variety of concepts using clinical and MRI parameters. These medical achievements have positively influenced the natural course of MS, especially by significantly reducing the relapse activity. In contrast, however, the risk of potential complications under long-term immunotherapy should not be underestimated. This concerns in particular infection risks but also an increased malignancy risk for various, mostly highly effective immunotherapies.

Therefore, the question increasingly arises in clinical practice as to what extent HET should be continued or should be de-escalated in case of long-term disease course. As patients and doctors take clinical decision to de-escalate their therapies, often after many years of little or even no disease activity, the central question of how to best monitor patients subsequently remains. Digital smartwatch-based measurements or app-based regular assessments could add high-frequency real-world data to the picture and thus improve the understanding of individual disease courses. Additionally, novel serological markers to detect neuronal damage are becoming more widely available. Consequently, this study aims to evaluate different digital measurements and blood-based analyses to monitor disease activity in MS patients, which have independently with their treating physicians decided to discontinue or de-escalate their disease-modifying treatment of MS.

Data captured by the used smartwatches (Withings Scanwatch) includes activity-related data (step count, minutes in certain intensity levels), basic cardiovascular measurements such as heart rate, and sleep-related data (total time asleep, sleep efficiency and quality etc.). Blood-based measurements include serum neurofilament-light-chain (sNfL), glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and proteomic data. The investigators will attempt to closely analyze MS patients after de-escalating or discontinuation of immunotherapy using digital and serological biomarkers in order to detect possible increased disease activity. In addition to clinical assessment, structural MRI examinations will be optionally conducted in patients from core center at baseline and in month 12 and 24. Measurement parameters from clinical MRI examinations (lesion load) are also taken into account from the other study centers. In addition to that, patients from core center will undergo an Optical coherence tomography (OCT) measurement. OCT is a non-invasive, interferometric method that allows for detailed visualization of retinal morphology and is known to reveal abnormalities in various central nervous system (CNS) disorders. Data will be collected for a 24-month prospective period.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

150

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Duesseldorf, Germany
        • Recruiting
        • Heinrich-Heine University, Duesseldorf
        • Contact:
          • Marc Günter Pawlitzki, Dr. med.

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

N/A

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

150 MS patients after treatment de-escalation/discontinuation

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosed RRMS according to 2017 revised McDonald criteria 12
  • De-escalation of high-efficacy treatment or discontinuation of lower efficacy disease modifying therapy (DMT)
  • Own a smartphone (only core centre) EDSS <7.0
  • able to handle a smartphone (only core centre)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with an acute MS relapse and/or a history of intravenous corticosteroid treatment or immunoadsorption within past six weeks.
  • Any comorbidity resulting in an impairment to understand or successfully complete the study such as (but not restricted to) psychiatric comorbidities or dementia. Decision will be made at investigators discretion.
  • Diagnosis of primary or secondary progressive MS

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Core center
In addition to clinical assessment, MRI examinations will be optionally conducted in patients from core center at baseline and in month 12 and 24. Measurement parameters from clinical MRI examinations (lesion load) are also taken into account from the other study centers. In addition to that, patients from core center will undergo an Optical coherence tomography (OCT) measurement.
Data captured by the used smartwatches (Withings Scanwatch) includes activity-related data (step count, minutes in certain intensity levels), basic cardiovascular measurements such as heart rate, and sleep-related data (total time asleep, sleep efficiency and quality etc.).
Extended cohort
Clinical assessment will be conducted in patients from extended cohort at baseline and in month 6, 12, 18 and 24.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of disease activity, measured by loss of NEDA at month 24
Time Frame: Baseline up to 24 months
According to NEDA-3 (Giovannoni et al., 2015) indicated by relapse, EDSS or cerebral magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) activity.
Baseline up to 24 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
EDSS: Change From Baseline in Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) Score
Time Frame: Baseline up to 24 months (after 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months)
The EDSS is used to quantify disability due to symptoms of MS and to track changes in disability status over time. Scores range from 0 (normal neurological exam) to 10 (death due to multiple sclerosis). Higher scores indicate the worse level of disability.
Baseline up to 24 months (after 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months)
Change From Baseline in World Health Organization Quality of Life Brief Version (WHOQOL-BREF) Score
Time Frame: Baseline up to 24 months (after 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months)
• The WHOQOL-BREF questionnaire measures quality of life across 4 domains: Physical health, psychological health, social relationships and environment. It also includes one question on overall QOL and one on general health. The WHOQOL-BREF scores correlate highly (.89 or above) with WHOQOL-100 scores, and demonstrate good discriminant validity, content validity, internal consistency and test-retest reliability. The four WHOQOL-BREF domain scores will be used as main outcome measure. The measure is calculated by summing the point values for the questions corresponding to each domain and then transforming the scores to a 0-100 point interval, higher score correspond to greater QOL.
Baseline up to 24 months (after 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months)
Change From Baseline in Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite (MSFC) Score - Component Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test
Time Frame: Baseline up to 24 months (after 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months)

The Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test (PASAT) measures cognitive processing speed and working memory by evaluating how accurately participants can perform mental arithmetic tasks while listening to a series of numbers. It's one of the components of the Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite (MSFC), alongside the Timed 25-foot walk (T25FW) and the 9-hole peg test (9HPT) for both dominant and nondominant hands.

The MSFC Z-score is calculated by creating Z-scores for each component of the MSFC and averaging them to create an overall composite score. A Z-score represented the number of standard deviations participant's test result was higher (Z >0) or lower (Z <0) than the average test result (Z = 0) from the reference population. Higher scores indicate better outcomes.

Baseline up to 24 months (after 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months)
Change From Baseline in Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite (MSFC) Score - Component 9-hole peg test
Time Frame: Baseline up to 24 months (after 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months)

The 9-hole peg test (9HPT) evaluates manual dexterity by assessing the time it takes for a participant to complete the task using both dominant and nondominant hands. It's part of the Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite (MSFC), which also includes the Timed 25-foot walk (T25FW) and the Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test (PASAT).

The MSFC Z-score is calculated by creating Z-scores for each component of the MSFC and averaging them to create an overall composite score. A Z-score represented the number of standard deviations participant's test result was higher (Z >0) or lower (Z <0) than the average test result (Z = 0) from the reference population. Higher scores indicate better outcomes.

Baseline up to 24 months (after 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months)
Change From Baseline in Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite (MSFC) Score - Component Timed 25-foot walk (T25FW)
Time Frame: Baseline up to 24 months (after 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months)

The Timed 25-foot walk (T25FW) assesses mobility and ambulation by measuring the time it takes for a participant to walk 25 feet. It's a component of the Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite (MSFC), along with the 9-hole peg test (9HPT) for both dominant and nondominant hands, and the Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test (PASAT).

The MSFC Z-score is calculated by creating Z-scores for each component of the MSFC and averaging them to create an overall composite score. A Z-score represented the number of standard deviations participant's test result was higher (Z >0) or lower (Z <0) than the average test result (Z = 0) from the reference population. Higher scores indicate better outcomes.

Baseline up to 24 months (after 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months)
Change in Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)
Time Frame: Time frame: Screening + Baseline (V1), After 6 months (V2), After 12 months (V3), After 18 months (V4), After 24 months (V5)
Time frame: Screening + Baseline (V1), After 6 months (V2), After 12 months (V3), After 18 months (V4), After 24 months (V5)
Change From Baseline in Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS)
Time Frame: Baseline up to 24 months (after 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months)
The FSS is a self-assessment questionnaire that provides a score as a measurement of the severity of fatigue. It consists of 9 questions scored from 1 to 7, low value indicates strong disagreement with the statement, whereas a high value indicates strong agreement. A total score of 36 or more suggests the presence of fatigue.
Baseline up to 24 months (after 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months)
Change in Blood analysis (levels of sNfl, GFAP, serum proteomics)
Time Frame: Time frame: Screening + Baseline (V1), After 6 months (V2), After 12 months (V3), After 18 months (V4), After 24 months (V5)
Time frame: Screening + Baseline (V1), After 6 months (V2), After 12 months (V3), After 18 months (V4), After 24 months (V5)
Questionnaire about smartwatch usage (System Usability Score)
Time Frame: After 6 months and 24 months of use
The System Usability Scale (SUS) is a widely recognized and straightforward tool for evaluating the usability of various systems, including software applications, websites, and various user interfaces. It consists of a 10-item questionnaire with five response options ranging from Strongly Agree to Strongly Disagree. The SUS provides a global view of subjective assessments of usability, making it applicable to a range of design products and services, including healthcare systems and applications.
After 6 months and 24 months of use
Wearing time of smartwatch (daily)
Time Frame: during the entire observation period
during the entire observation period
Longitudinal development of activity parameter: step count
Time Frame: during the entire observation period
during the entire observation period
Longitudinal development of activity parameter: approximate distance traveled (meter)
Time Frame: during the entire observation period
during the entire observation period
Longitudinal development of activity parameter: duration of soft activity (seconds) defined by Withings
Time Frame: during the entire observation period
during the entire observation period
Longitudinal development of activity parameter: duration of moderate activity (seconds) defined by Withings
Time Frame: during the entire observation period
during the entire observation period
Longitudinal development of activity parameter: duration of intense activity (seconds) defined by Withings
Time Frame: during the entire observation period
during the entire observation period
Longitudinal development of activity parameter: sum of all active time (seconds)
Time Frame: during the entire observation period
during the entire observation period
Longitudinal development of sleep parameter: time awake (seconds)
Time Frame: during the entire observation period
during the entire observation period
Longitudinal development of activity parameter: approximate calories burned
Time Frame: during the entire observation period
during the entire observation period
Longitudinal development of sleep parameter: number of times user woke up
Time Frame: during the entire observation period
during the entire observation period
Longitudinal development of sleep parameter: time to sleep (seconds)
Time Frame: during the entire observation period
during the entire observation period
Longitudinal development of sleep parameter: heart rate variability (ms)
Time Frame: during the entire observation period
during the entire observation period
Longitudinal development of sleep parameter: total time asleep (seconds)
Time Frame: during the entire observation period
during the entire observation period
Longitudinal development of sleep parameter: total time in bed (seconds)
Time Frame: during the entire observation period
during the entire observation period
Longitudinal development of sleep parameter: ratio of sleep/time in bed
Time Frame: during the entire observation period
during the entire observation period
Longitudinal development of sleep parameter: time spent in bed before falling asleep (seconds)
Time Frame: during the entire observation period
during the entire observation period
Longitudinal development of sleep parameter: time awake after first falling asleep (seconds)
Time Frame: during the entire observation period
during the entire observation period
Longitudinal development of sleep parameter: Withings Sleep score
Time Frame: during the entire observation period
during the entire observation period
Longitudinal development of cardiovascular parameter: average heartrate
Time Frame: during the entire observation period
during the entire observation period
Longitudinal development of cardiovascular parameter: maximal heartrate
Time Frame: during the entire observation period
during the entire observation period
Longitudinal development of cardiovascular parameter: minimum heartrate
Time Frame: during the entire observation period
during the entire observation period
Longitudinal development of cardiovascular parameter: time in light heartrate zone (seconds)
Time Frame: during the entire observation period
during the entire observation period
Longitudinal development of cardiovascular parameter: time in moderate heartrate zone (seconds)
Time Frame: during the entire observation period
during the entire observation period
Longitudinal development of cardiovascular parameter: time in intense heartrate zone (seconds)
Time Frame: during the entire observation period
during the entire observation period
Longitudinal development of cardiovascular parameter: time in maximal heartrate zone (seconds)
Time Frame: during the entire observation period
during the entire observation period

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Marc Günter Pawlitzki, PD Dr. med., Heinrich-Heine University, Duesseldorf

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 15, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

October 30, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 25, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 10, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

June 17, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 3, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 1, 2024

Last Verified

July 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Multiple Sclerosis

Clinical Trials on Withings Scanwatch

Subscribe