Promoting Access, Resources and Treatment Through Novel and Equitable Solutions for Cancer Care (PARTNERS)

September 26, 2025 updated by: Case Comprehensive Cancer Center

PARTNERS: Promoting Access, Resources and Treatment Through Novel and Equitable Solutions for Cancer Care

The purpose of this research is to evaluate a novel, integrated approach to providing navigation services to improve cancer outcomes and quality of life.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

In a seminal paper published in 1995, Dr. Harold Freeman proposed that "Patient navigators act as patient advocates for patients with abnormal (Cancer) screening findings."Since that article was published, there has been an extensive literature to support the value of patient navigation services to promote timely and complete receipt of cancer care services for participants newly diagnosed with cancer, as well as along the continuum of cancer treatment, including among underserved populations. Despite this literature, it was not until January 2024 that the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) formally recognized patient navigation as a reimbursable service in clinical settings. A key value that is attributed to PN services is the ability of navigational processes to improve equitable cancer caner service deliver for participants, irrespective of a person's social determinants of health (SDOHs) composition, including factors like financial stability, educational attainment, access to health care, race/ethnicity, and/or rurality of residence.

In response to the unmet and significant need to reduce disparities in cancer care delivery, in 2022, the Merck Foundation launched a national effort to select 8 grantees across the United States (US) to develop a national, sustainable model to improve equitable cancer care services which, in turn, should help reduce the long-standing, pervasive disparities observed in cancer outcomes for persons of minority race/ethnic status and/or SDOHs. As part of this Alliance, the Case CCC and CWRU PARTNERS study team will develop and examine elements of patient navigational processes that promote timely receipt of cancer care services, more effective patient-provider-systems-level communication around cancer care, while addressing the SDOH needs of participants and ensuring receipt of services after participant referrals ("closed loops"). This project proposes an intentional focus on engaging persons who represent medically disadvantaged or fragile populations (defined here as Greater Cleveland area residents who are Black/African American, Hispanic, and/or reside in a zip code with "high" area deprivation indices).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

375

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Ohio
      • Cleveland, Ohio, United States, 44106
        • Recruiting
        • Case Comprehensive Cancer Center
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

There are two levels of criteria for inclusion.

  • First, investigators will identify individuals who have either had a cancer screening with a suspicious finding (ie. requires diagnostic follow-up) or those individuals who are referred to the UH Seidman Diagnostic Clinic (led by Co-I Hoehn).
  • Within that group, investigators will recruit those who identify as African American, Hispanic, or living in a prioritized geography as defined by zip code ADI>=75%ile for state

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any participant who is not willing or able to complete an informed consent form will not be eligible for this study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Patient Navigation Services
Following the consent process, participant will have access to a Patient Navigator, who will serve as a resource for during the time in the study to help navigate and get connected to local resources. The Patient Navigator will keep track of the kinds of support services and referrals provided. The Patient Navigator will contact the participant in 4 months to reassess current needs, quality of life, and areas where additional support is needed.
CONNECT platform provides access to participant information across the 5 participant sites to facilitate a more holistic approach to addressing participant needs. It is the use of this cloud-based, HIPAA compliant platform that constitutes the uniqueness of this behavioral intervention.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Participant improvement as measured by participant distress screening tool
Time Frame: 4 months
Participant distress screening assessment tool is a list of questionnaire with a scale from 0-10, where 0 is none and 10 is extreme distress
4 months
Quality of life as measured by PHQ-9 Patient Depression Questionnaire
Time Frame: 4 months
Intepretation for PHQ-9 Patient Depression Questionnaire is based on the final score ranging from 1-27, 1-4 is minimal depression, 5-9 is mild, 10-14 is moderate, 15-19 is moderately severe, 20-27 is severe depression
4 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The number of social needs as measured by HRSN(Health related social need) questionnaire
Time Frame: 4 months
HRSN is a list of 19 questions with multiple choice answers with a scale from 1-5 for each question, where 1 is never and 5 is frequently. A score of 11 or more when numerical values for anwers to questions 6-9 are added shows that the person might not be safe.
4 months
Rate of patient satisfaction as measured by cancer care survey
Time Frame: 4 months
Patient satisfaction with cancer care survey rate based on a scale from 1-5, where 1 is strongly disagree and 5 is strongly agree
4 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Erika Trapl, PhD, Case Western Reserve University, Case Comprehensive Cancer Center

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 30, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 30, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 30, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 24, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 24, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

July 1, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

September 29, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 26, 2025

Last Verified

September 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • CASE4Z24

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

As a recipient of Merck Foundation funding, investigators are obligated to collect "harmonized metrics" for program participants. This data is shared back (at the individual level) with the National Program Office. There is no PHI in this dataset, and there is no personal identifying information that is shared. The data is not shared beyond the NPO; all data shared by the NPO is aggregated and not identifiable. Additionally, investigator does not intend to share IPD with anyone outside of the NPO

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Data is shared with the NPO on a quarterly basis

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Data is only shared with the NPO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe