Influencer Marketing: a Survey-based Experiment Among Adolescents

July 12, 2024 updated by: Jennifer Unger, University of Southern California

The Impact of Healthy Lifestyle Imagery Alongside E-cigarettes in Social Media Influencer Marketing on Perceptions of E-cigarettes Among Adolescents: a Survey-based Experiment

Adolescents (N = 664) participated in the online survey-based experiment. They were randomly shown 10 videos, featuring influencers promoting e-cigarettes alongside healthy lifestyle activities (experimental group), or e-cigarette promotion alone (control). After watching each video, participants rated perceptions of influencer credibility (i.e., honesty, trustworthiness, knowledge) on the scale of 0 (e.g., dishonest) to 100 (honest).

Among all participants, harm perceptions and appeal of e-cigarettes was assessed. Susceptibility to use e-cigarettes was assessed among never users of e-cigarettes. These outcomes were then compared among participants who perceived influencers as credible and those who perceived influencers as non-credible.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Adolescents (13-17 years of age) living in California were recruited by Qualtrics marketing research panel to participate in a survey on tobacco-related attitudes and behaviors. Qualtrics, a research panel agency, has been used in prior research to survey adolescents about their tobacco-related attitudes and behaviors. Participants were provided with a survey URL link. After completing informed consent, participants completed the survey online. The study was approved by the University of Southern California Institutional Review Board (UP-21-00352). Respondents were randomly assigned to watch 10 10-second long TikTok videos in either experimental (influencers promoting e-cigarettes alongside healthy lifestyle activities) or control group (influencers promoting e-cigarettes alone).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

664

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Washington
      • Seattle, Washington, United States, 98101
        • Online survey, Qualtrics

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 13-17 years of age,
  • English fluency,
  • Current California resident.

Exclusion Criteria:

Not meeting these criteria:

  • 13-17 years of age,
  • English fluency,
  • Current California resident.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Factorial Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Experimental group
Videos featuring influencers promoting e-cigarettes alongside healthy lifestyle activities
Participants watched online survey-imbedded promotional videos featuring influencers
Active Comparator: Control group
Videos featuring influencers promoting e-cigarettes alone
Participants watched online survey-imbedded promotional videos featuring influencers

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Susceptibility to use e-cigarettes
Time Frame: one-time assessment after the experimental exposure (immediately post-treatment)
Susceptibility to use e-cigarettes was measured (among never-users of e-cigarettes), using the validated three-item scale adapted from PATH, and combined into one variable (α=0.93). Consistent with prior research, the measure was dichotomized with responses "definitely not" to all items being coded as "not susceptible" and responses "probably not," "probably yes", or "definitely yes" being coded as "susceptible."
one-time assessment after the experimental exposure (immediately post-treatment)
Harm perceptions of e-cigarettes
Time Frame: one-time assessment after the experimental exposure (immediately post-treatment)
Responses to two questions adapted from PATH, "Based on the videos you just watched, do you think using e-cigarettes for vaping nicotine is harmful to your health?" "Based on the videos you just watched, do you think people harm themselves when they use e-cigarettes for vaping nicotine?" Outcome was assessed on the 0 (Not harmful at all) - 100 (Very harmful) scale. Since the items were closely related (α=0.87), they were combined (by summing all the non-missing values of the items) into one variable.
one-time assessment after the experimental exposure (immediately post-treatment)
Perceived appeal of e-cigarettes
Time Frame: one-time assessment after the experimental exposure (immediately post-treatment)

Responses to the following questions: using e-cigarette is:

  • not cool/cool,
  • unattractive/attractive,
  • boring/fun were assessed on the 7-point semantic differential scale with the word pairs anchored at each end. The scale was adapted from prior research. The items were combined (by summing all the non-missing values of the items) into one variable (α=0.93).
one-time assessment after the experimental exposure (immediately post-treatment)
Perceptions of influencer credibility
Time Frame: assessed 10 times immediately after each video
Perceptions of influencer credibility (i.e., honesty, trustworthiness, knowledge) were assessed using a 0 (e.g., dishonest) -100 (e.g., honest) scale that has been validated in prior research.
assessed 10 times immediately after each video

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 12, 2024

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 29, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

February 29, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 8, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 12, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

July 15, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 15, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 12, 2024

Last Verified

July 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • UP-21-00352

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

de-identified data will be publicly available on GitHub repository if a manuscript related to this study is accepted for publication

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Vaping

Clinical Trials on Influencer marketing

Subscribe