- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06524505
Efficacy, Tolerability, and Cognitive Effects of Deep Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Bipolar Depression
Efficacy, Tolerability, and Cognitive Effects of Deep Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Bipolar Depression: a Double-blind, Randomized Controlled Trial
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Detailed Description
This is a randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled study to detect the effect of dTMS for treatment of bipolar depression. 100 participants were randomly assigned 1:1 to dTMS group or sham-control group. For both active and sham group, daily dTMS sessions were scheduled in a 5-day sequence for four consecutive weeks, and each session lasted 20minutes. Based on the original and stable medication, the active stimulation consisted of 55 18 Hz, 2 s trains at 120% motor threshold (MT) intensity, with a between-train interval of 20 s (1980 pulses per day or 39 600 pulses per treatment). The sham stimulation was performed using the same procedures, with the sham coil.
Scale assessments are performed at baseline, week 2, week 4 and week 8. Collection of blood took place at baseline, week 4 and week 8.
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Jie Li, Doctor
- Phone Number: +86 022 88188006
- Email: jieli@tjmhc.com
Study Locations
-
-
-
Tianjin, China
- Recruiting
- Tianjin Anding Hospital
-
Contact:
- Jie Li, Doctor
- Phone Number: +86 022 88188006
- Email: jieli@tjmhc.com
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
Confirmed diagnosis of bipolar depression;
- age between 18 and 65 years;
- a 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS-17) score >= 17,
- a stable pharmacological regimen maintained for at least 4 weeks prior to the beginning of the treatment phase ;
- for participants who had previously received antidepressant therapy, a minimum 4-week washout period followed by re-evaluation.
Exclusion Criteria:
- a lifetime history of other psychiatric disorders, neurological diseases, or severe brain injury;
- receipt of electroconvulsive therapy, rTMS, transcranial direct current stimulation, transcranial alternating current stimulation, or other neurostimulation treatments within the previous 3 months;
- contraindications to magnetic stimulation, including epilepsy, cardiovascular disorders, or metallic implants in the head;
- the presence of hypomanic/manic symptoms at baseline or a score greater than 12 on the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS);
- pregnancy or lactation.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Quadruple
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: dTMS group
Participants receive active stimulation with H1 coil, consisting of 55 18 Hz, 2 s trains at 120% MT intensity, with a between-train interval of 20 s ,1980 pulses per day.
The subjects were stimulated every day for 4 weeks (except weekends).
|
with the H1-coil device included 20-min sessions of 18 Hz (2-s trains separated by 20-s inter-train intervals, 55 trains totaling 1980 pulses/session).
|
|
Sham Comparator: sham group
The sham stimulation was performed using the same procedures, with the sham coil.
|
The sham stimulation was performed using the same procedures, with the sham coil.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
The change over time in the score of Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS-17).
Time Frame: baseline, week 2, week 4, week 8
|
The aim is to explore whether deep Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (dTMS) combined with Pharmacological treatment could alleviate the severity of depressive symptoms as measured with HDRS-17 in bipolar depression after 4-week treatment.
Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS-17) was used to evaluate the severity of symptoms of depression.
Higher total score of the scale means more severe depressive symptoms.
|
baseline, week 2, week 4, week 8
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
The change over time in the score of Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAMA)
Time Frame: baseline, week 2, week 4, week 8
|
The aim is to explore whether dTMS combined with Pharmacological treatment could alleviate the severity of anxious symptoms as measured with HAMA in bipolar depression after 4-week treatment.
Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAMA) was used to evaluate the severity of symptoms of anxiety.
Higher total score of the scale means more severe anxious symptoms.
|
baseline, week 2, week 4, week 8
|
|
The change of scores in MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery(MCCB)
Time Frame: baseline, week 4, week 8
|
The aim is to observe whether active-stimuli in addition to pharmacological treatment will improve the cognitive function as measured with the MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB) after 4 weeks of treatment compared to sham-stimuli, and investigators assess the scale at baseline, week 4 and week 8.
|
baseline, week 4, week 8
|
|
Response and remission rates at weeks 2, week 4 and week 8 with HDRS-17.
Time Frame: weeks 2, week 4 and week 8
|
The aim is to evaluate the response and remission rates at weeks 2, week 4 and week 8 with HDRS-17.
|
weeks 2, week 4 and week 8
|
|
The changes of levels of Brain Derived Neurotrophic Factor (BDNF) in peripheral blood
Time Frame: baseline, week 4, week 8
|
The aim is to investigate the change of Brain Derived Neurotrophic Factor (BDNF) level in peripheral blood as active stimuli in addition to regular medical treatment after 4 weeks of treatment compared to sham stimuli, and EDTA tubes were used to collect 5ml of peripheral blood at baseline, weeks 4, and 8 before feeding.
The plasma was extracted after centrifugation, and the concentration of BDNF in plasma was detected by ELISA.
|
baseline, week 4, week 8
|
|
The change of scores of adverse events scale from baseline to week 4
Time Frame: baseline, week 4
|
The aim is to evaluate the adverse effects during the treatment.
|
baseline, week 4
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- dTMS-TJAH
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.