Study of Bictegravir/Lenacapavir in Children and Adolescents With HIV-1

June 3, 2026 updated by: Gilead Sciences

A Phase 2/3, Open-Label Study to Evaluate the Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Antiviral Activity of Bictegravir/Lenacapavir in Children and Adolescents With HIV-1

The goal of this clinical study is to learn about the safety and tolerability of bictegravir/lenacapavir (BIC/LEN) and to learn how the study drug interacts with the body in virologically suppressed (VS) children and adolescents with human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) on a stable and complex antiretroviral (ARV) regimen. The study will also assess the safe loading dose of LEN and pharmacokinetics (PK) of BIC/LEN.

The primary objectives of this study are:

  • To evaluate the steady-state PK of BIC and LEN and confirm the dose of the LEN loading dose and BIC/LEN FDC in VS children and adolescents with HIV-1.
  • To evaluate the safety and tolerability of BIC/LEN through Week 24 in VS children and adolescents with HIV-1.

Study Overview

Status

Active, not recruiting

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

75

Phase

  • Phase 2
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Buenos Aires, Argentina, C1141ACG,
        • Helios Salud S.A
      • Milan, Italy, 20157
        • ASST FBF Sacco Ospedale Sacco
      • Roma, Italy, 00165
        • IRCCS Ospedale Pediatrico Bambino Gesu, UOS Infezioni Complesse e Perinatali
      • Cape Town, South Africa, 7505
        • FAMCRU Ukwanda School for Rural Health
      • Cape Town, South Africa, 7646
        • Be Part Yoluntu
      • Durban, South Africa, 3629
        • Durban International Clinical Research Site, Enhancing Care Foundation
      • East London, South Africa, 5219
        • Monti Clinical Research Centre
      • Johannesburg, South Africa, 1862
        • Perinatal HIV Research Unit
      • Johannesburg, South Africa, 2038
        • Wits RHI Shandukani Research Centre CRS
      • Johannesburg, South Africa, 2112
        • Nkanyezi VIDA Research Unit
      • Ka-Majosi, South Africa, 944
        • Khomanani Health Research and Wellness Centre
      • KwaDukuza, South Africa, 4449
        • Clinical Research Institute of South Africa (CRISA)
      • Pretoria, South Africa, 0087
        • The Aurum Institute: Pretoria Clinical Research Centre
      • Soshanguve, South Africa, 0152
        • Setshaba Research Centre
      • Madrid, Spain, 28041
        • Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre
      • Madrid, Spain, 28046
        • Hospital Universitario La Paz
      • Madrid, Spain, 28007
        • Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marano
    • District of Columbia
      • Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States, 20010
        • Children's National Hospital
    • Florida
      • Tampa, Florida, United States, 33612
        • University of South Florida
    • Georgia
      • Atlanta, Georgia, United States, 30308
        • Grady Ponce de Leon Center
    • Illinois
      • Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60614
        • Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Key Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age and body weight at screening:

    • Cohort 1: ≥ 12 years to < 18 years weighing ≥ 35 kg.
    • Cohort 2: ≥ 6 years to < 12 years weighing ≥ 25 kg to < 35 kg.
    • Cohort 3: ≥ 2 years to < 6 years weighing ≥ 10 kg to < 25 kg.
  • On a complex ARV regimen. Complex regimens are any ARV therapy that is not a single-tablet regimen taken once daily (eg, > 1 tablet or any other formulation a day).
  • Documented plasma HIV-1 ribonucleic acid (RNA) levels must be < 50 copies/mL (or undetectable HIV-1 RNA level according to the local assay being used if the limit of detection is < 50 copies/mL) in the last 6 months prior to screening (at least 1 measure prior to screening).
  • Plasma HIV-1 RNA levels < 50 copies/mL at screening.
  • No documented or suspected resistance to integrase strand transfer inhibitors (mutations T66A/I/K, E92G/Q/V, G118R, F121C/Y, G140R, Y143C/H/R, S147G, Q148H/K/R, N155H/S, or R263K in the integrase gene).
  • The following laboratory parameters at screening:

    • Estimated glomerular filtration rate ≥ 30 mL/min/1.73 m2 using the Bedside Schwartz formula.
    • Absolute neutrophil count > 0.50 cells/L (> 500 cells/mm3).
    • Hemoglobin ≥ 85 g/L (> 8.5 g/dL).
    • Platelets ≥ 50 cells/L (≥ 50,000 cells/mm3).
    • Hepatic transaminases (aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase)

      ≤ 5 x upper limit of normal.

    • Total bilirubin ≤ 23 μmol/L (≤ 1.5 mg/dL) and direct bilirubin ≤ 7 μmol/L (≤ 0.4 mg/dL).

Key Exclusion Criteria:

  • CD4 cell count < 200 cells/mm^3.
  • CD4 percentage < 20%.
  • Life expectancy ≤ 1 year.
  • An opportunistic illness indicative of Stage 3 HIV diagnosed within the 30 days prior to screening.
  • Evidence of active pulmonary or extrapulmonary tuberculosis within 3 months prior to screening.
  • Acute hepatitis within 30 days prior to screening.
  • Positive hepatitis C virus (HCV) antibody with detectable HCV RNA (participants positive for HCV antibody will have an HCV RNA test performed).
  • Positive hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) or positive hepatitis B virus (HBV) core antibody (antibody against hepatitis B core antigen [anti-HBc]) at screening. If a participant is negative for HBsAg and positive for anti-HBc but HBV DNA is undetectable, the participant may be enrolled.
  • A history of or current decompensated liver cirrhosis (eg, ascites, encephalopathy, or variceal bleeding).Current alcohol or substance use judged by the investigator to potentially interfere with the participant's study compliance.

Note: Other protocol defined Inclusion/Exclusion criteria may apply.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Sequential Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Cohort 1: Participants Aged ≥ 12 to < 18 years with Weight ≥ 35 kg: BIC/LEN 75/50 mg FDC

Participants will receive a 2-day oral loading dose of LEN (600 mg) on Days 1 and 2 and daily oral BIC/LEN 75/50 mg starting on Day 1 through Week 48.

Following Week 48, participants will have an option to continue BIC/LEN in the extension period.

Tablets administered orally without regard to food
Other Names:
  • GS-6207
Tablets administered orally without regard to food
Experimental: Cohort 2: Participants Aged ≥ 6 to < 12 years with Weight ≥ 25 kg to < 35 kg

All participants will receive a 2-day oral loading dose of LEN, and daily oral BIC and LEN dose starting on Day 1 through Week 48. Dose in cohort 2 to be defined.

Following Week 48, participants will have an option to continue BIC/LEN in the extension period.

Tablets administered orally without regard to food
Other Names:
  • GS-6207
Tablets administered orally without regard to food
Experimental: Cohort 3: Participants Aged ≥ 2 to < 6 years with Weight ≥ 10 kg to < 25 kg

All participants will receive a 2-day oral loading dose of LEN, and daily oral BIC and LEN dose starting on Day 1 through Week 48. Dose in cohort 3 to be defined.

Following Week 48, participants will have an option to continue BIC/LEN in the extension period.

Tablets administered orally without regard to food
Other Names:
  • GS-6207
Tablets administered orally without regard to food

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Participants Experiencing Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Through Week 24
Time Frame: First dose date up to Week 24
First dose date up to Week 24
Percentage of Participants Experiencing Treatment-Emergent Laboratory Abnormalities Through Week 24
Time Frame: First dose date up to Week 24
First dose date up to Week 24
PK Parameter: Cmax of BIC and LEN at Steady State
Time Frame: Day 1 up to Week 24, as appropriate
Cmax is defined as the maximum observed concentration of drug at steady state.
Day 1 up to Week 24, as appropriate
PK Parameter: AUCtau of BIC and LEN at Steady State
Time Frame: Day 1 up to Week 24, as appropriate
AUCtau is defined as the area under the concentration versus time curve over the dosing interval at steady state.
Day 1 up to Week 24, as appropriate
PK Parameter: Ctrough of BIC and LEN at Steady State
Time Frame: Day 1 up to Week 24, as appropriate
Ctrough is defined as the observed drug concentration at the end of the dosing interval at steady state.
Day 1 up to Week 24, as appropriate

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
PK Parameter: AUClast for BIC and LEN at Steady State
Time Frame: Day 1 up to Week 48, as appropriate
AUClast is defined as the area under the concentration versus time curve from time zero to the last quantifiable concentration at steady state.
Day 1 up to Week 48, as appropriate
PK Parameter: Tmax for BIC and LEN at Steady State
Time Frame: Day 1 up to Week 48, as appropriate
Tmax is defined as the time (observed time point) of Cmax at steady state.
Day 1 up to Week 48, as appropriate
PK Parameter: Tlast for BIC and LEN at Steady State
Time Frame: Day 1 up to Week 48, as appropriate
Tlast is defined as the time (observed time point) of Clast at steady state. Clast is defined as the last measurable concentration (above the quantification limit).
Day 1 up to Week 48, as appropriate
PK Parameter: T1/2 for BIC and LEN at Steady State
Time Frame: Day 1 up to Week 48, as appropriate
T1/2 is defined as the terminal elimination half-life at steady state.
Day 1 up to Week 48, as appropriate
PK Parameter: CL for BIC and LEN at Steady State
Time Frame: Day 1 up to Week 48, as appropriate
Clearance (CL) is the volume of plasma cleared of drug over a specified time period, at a steady state.
Day 1 up to Week 48, as appropriate
PK Parameter: Vz for BIC and LEN at Steady State
Time Frame: Day 1 up to Week 48, as appropriate
Volume of distribution (Vz) is defined as the extent to in which the drug is distributed in the body tissue, rather than the plasma, to produce the desired effects at a steady state.
Day 1 up to Week 48, as appropriate
PK Parameter: λz for BIC and LEN at Steady State
Time Frame: Day 1 up to Week 48, as appropriate
λz is defined as the terminal elimination rate constant, which determines the rate at which the drug will be eliminated from the body after it is absorbed and distributed at a steady state.
Day 1 up to Week 48, as appropriate
Percentage of Participants Experiencing TEAEs Through Week 48
Time Frame: First dose date up to Week 48
First dose date up to Week 48
Percentage of Participants Experiencing Treatment-Emergent Laboratory Abnormalities Through Week 48
Time Frame: First does date up to Week 48
First does date up to Week 48
Proportion of Participants With Plasma HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL and ≥ 50 copies/mL at Week 24 Based on the United States (US) Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-Defined Snapshot Algorithm
Time Frame: Week 24
Week 24
Proportion of Participants With Plasma HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL and ≥ 50 copies/mL at Week 48 Based on the United States FDA-Defined Snapshot Algorithm
Time Frame: Week 48
Week 48
Change from Baseline in Clusters of Differentiation 4 (CD4) Cell Counts at Week 24
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 24
Baseline, Week 24
Change from Baseline in CD4 Percentage at Week 24
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 24
Baseline, Week 24
Change from Baseline in CD4 Cell Counts at Week 48
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 48
Baseline, Week 48
Change from Baseline in CD4 Percentage at Week 48
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 48
Baseline, Week 48
Acceptability and Palatability Summary of LEN Oral Loading Dose at Day 1 Assessed by Questionnaire
Time Frame: Day 1
Palatability and acceptability assessed by a numeric response between numbers 1-5. Higher scores indicate better palatability and acceptability.
Day 1
Acceptability and Palatability Summary of LEN Oral Loading Dose at Day 2 Assessed by Questionnaire
Time Frame: Day 2
Palatability and acceptability assessed by a numeric response between numbers 1-5. Higher scores indicate better palatability and acceptability.
Day 2
Acceptability and Palatability Summary of Oral BIC/LEN Fixed Dose Combination (FDC) at Day 1 Assessed by Questionnaire
Time Frame: Day 1
Palatability and acceptability assessed by a numeric response between numbers 1-5. Higher scores indicate better palatability and acceptability.
Day 1
Acceptability and Palatability Summary of Oral BIC/LEN FDC at Week 4 Assessed by Questionnaire
Time Frame: Week 4
Palatability and acceptability assessed by a numeric response between numbers 1-5. Higher scores indicate better palatability and acceptability.
Week 4
Acceptability and Palatability Summary of Oral BIC/LEN FDC at Week 24 Assessed by Questionnaire
Time Frame: Week 24
Palatability and acceptability assessed by a numeric response between numbers 1-5. Higher scores indicate better palatability and acceptability.
Week 24
Acceptability and Palatability Summary of Oral BIC/LEN FDC at Week 48 Assessed by Questionnaire
Time Frame: Week 48
Palatability and acceptability assessed by a numeric response between numbers 1-5. Higher scores indicate better palatability and acceptability.
Week 48

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Study Director: Gilead Study Director, Gilead Sciences

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 20, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2030

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2030

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 29, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 29, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

August 1, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 4, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 3, 2026

Last Verified

June 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • GS-US-621-6463
  • 2023-509428-16 (Other Identifier: European Medicines Agency)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on HIV-1-infection

Clinical Trials on Lenacapavir

Subscribe