Evaluation of Template Assisted Monochromatic Structural Colored Versus Universal Multi-Shade Direct Composite Veneers

August 7, 2024 updated by: Mohammed Abd El Ghany Mohammed, Tanta University
The aim of this study was to conduct a clinical trial utilizing a modified split-mouth, double-blinded, randomized strategy to clinically assess template assisted one shade structural colored versus universal multi-shade direct composite veneers

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The superior mechanical qualities, superb aesthetics, and versatility of resin-based composites (RBCs) make them popular choices for direct restorative applications. Compared to their predecessors, nanocomposites have shown superior qualities since nanotechnology was introduced in the production of dental RBCs.

A restoration's aesthetic integration is mostly the result of its chromatic characteristics. Pigments included in the composition of the restorative material typically control the selective reflection of wavelengths to emulate the natural tooth. In order to better reflect the broad color range that characterizes real dentition, RBCs have more recently employed the phenomena of "structural color" .

Thanks to the novel property of resins, color differences between the tooth and the restoration are eliminated or balanced out as perceived color of a region moves toward the color of the surrounding area . Additionally, as opposed to multi-shade RBCs, single-shade RBCs eliminate the need to select between various resin shades, streamlining the color choosing procedure and cutting down on time lost during the clinical resin selection process. The Vita Classic Shade Guide's shades can all be matched with these materials.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

20

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Egypt
      • Tanta, Egypt
        • Faculty of Dentistry

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • better dental hygiene
  • discolored vital anterior teeth

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Para functional activities
  • Non-vital teeth

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Omnichroma
Monochromatic structural colored composite
Other: Omnichroma
Each participants had two kinds of veneers
Other: Ceram. X Spectra
Ceram. X Spectra
Experimental: Ceram. X Spectra
Universal multi shade composite
Other: Omnichroma
Each participants had two kinds of veneers
Other: Ceram. X Spectra
Ceram. X Spectra

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Clinical evaluation was performed at baseline, six, nine, twelve, and eighteen months by two calibrated examiners using modified United States Public Health Service (USPHS) criteria
Time Frame: eighteen months
The perfect clinical scenario was represented by a score of 0, clinically acceptable by a score of 1, dubious by a score of 2, and clinically unsatisfactory by a score of 3 and 4.
eighteen months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Tanta University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 19, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 5, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

April 9, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 4, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 7, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

August 9, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 9, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 7, 2024

Last Verified

August 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • Direct veneers

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe