Clinical Study of Transcriptome-based Diagnostic Biomarker for Acute Febrile Illness

August 11, 2024 updated by: Qilu Hospital of Shandong University

Transcriptome-based Diagnostic Biomarker for Acute Febrile Illness: a Cross-sectional Observational Study

Acute febrile illness is the main cause of outpatient visits,and bacterial and viral infections remains the most common cause. The diagnosis of infection is still based on symptoms and traditional techniques, resulting in overuse of antibacterial drugs or delay in treatment. The signature of host transcripts has a potential to reveal different modes of host-pathogen interaction and may serve as a biomarker for infection discrimination. Of note, transcriptome-microarray and RNA-seq methods need sophisticated techniques and expertise interpretation, hampering the universal implement of these platforms in low-tier hospitals and under- resourced countries. This study explores transcriptome-based diagnostic biomarker for acute febrile illness , hoping to achieve rapid, accurate and cost-effective distinction between bacterial and viral infection.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Acute fever is a common medical emergency worldwide, most often caused by bacterial or viral infections. Early and rapid differential diagnosis of infectious diseases is crucial for improving patient outcomes. While pathogen detection remains the gold standard for diagnosing infections, methods like culture are time-consuming and often lack sensitivity. Additionally, the presence of normal colonizing microorganisms, such as bacteria and viruses in the human body, can lead to false positives in pathogen detection. These limitations often compel physicians to rely on empirical antibacterial therapy based on clinical symptoms, inadvertently contributing to antibiotic overuse and the growing problem of bacterial resistance.

Furthermore, the misuse of antibacterial drugs in patients with non-bacterial infections can lead to complications such as secondary infections with Clostridium difficile, liver dysfunction, kidney damage, cytopenia, and alterations in the body's microbiota. Diagnostic markers based on host inflammatory responses offer an alternative approach to infection diagnosis. However, protein biomarkers like procalcitonin, though widely used in clinical settings, are far from ideal for accurately diagnosing bacterial infections, as they are prone to false positives and negatives.

A promising direction is the analysis of host-pathogen interactions at the transcriptome level, particularly the differential gene expression of the host in response to various pathogens. This area of research has gained significant attention recently. Transcriptomic markers derived from patients' peripheral blood have been successfully utilized in diagnosing and studying the pathogenesis of various infectious diseases.

Despite these advances, studies relying on RNA sequencing or transcriptome chip technology require specialized equipment and bioinformatics expertise, making them expensive and challenging to implement in routine clinical practice. Additionally, the results from transcriptome analysis are not easily validated by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction(RT-PCR), the "gold standard" for RNA quantification. Therefore, to make transcriptome-based diagnostic markers more clinically applicable, there is a need for real-time technologies, such as PCR, to enhance the accuracy of infection diagnosis and reduce the misuse of antibacterial drugs. Currently, research in this area remains limited.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

900

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Shandong
      • Jinan, Shandong, China, 250012
        • Recruiting
        • Qilu Hospital of Shandong University
        • Contact:
          • Gang Wang

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Individuals who have an axillary temperature of 38°C or higher, with a fever duration of less than 14 days.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 1. axillary temperature ≥38°C; 2. duration of fever shorter than 14 days; 3. subjects who are fully informed and agree to participate in this study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • 1.having comorbidities that may affect host gene expression, such as advanced malignancy, autoimmune diseases,immunodeficiency, or taking immune suppressors; 2.pregnancy; 3. mixed infection (viral combined with bacterial infection, autoimmune disease combined with bacterial infection); 4.incomplete clinical information; 5. For safety reasons or the interests of patients, clinicians believe that patients should not participate in any situation in this study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Bacterial infection
Individuals with acute fever whose positive bacteria isolated from sterile or non-sterile sites have pathological characteristics.
Pathogens such as bacteria and viruses invade the human body, grow, and proliferation, triggering an immune response.
Viral infection
Individuals with acute fever whose viral nucleic acid test and/or serological positive compatible with acute syndrome#(e.g. serology, PCR).
Pathogens such as bacteria and viruses invade the human body, grow, and proliferation, triggering an immune response.
non-infectious group
Individuals with acute fever whose have negative findings in cultures and PCR; negative image modality findings suspected for infection; confirmed or highly likely other diagnosis; improvement without antibiotics.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
AUC for distinguishing bacterial infection from viral infection
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 2 years
The AUC of the transcript biomarkers for distinguishing bacterial infection from viral infection reflects the diagnostic accuracy of the transcript biomarkers.
Through study completion, an average of 2 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
AUC for distinguishing infectious disease from noninfectious disease
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 2 years
The AUC of the transcript biomarkers for distinguishing infectious disease from noninfectious disease reflects the diagnostic accuracy of the transcript biomarkers.
Through study completion, an average of 2 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Gang Wang, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 1, 2021

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

August 30, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 11, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 11, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

August 14, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 14, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 11, 2024

Last Verified

November 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

IPD Plan Description

It may require further evaluation of data privacy and ethical considerations to ensure that participants' privacy is not compromised by data sharing.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe