What Works to Prevent Violence Against Women and Girls in Somalia

February 11, 2026 updated by: Johns Hopkins University

What Works to Prevent Violence Against Women and Girls: Evaluation of the Communities Care Program in Somalia

The Communities Care (CC) program has demonstrated promise in changing harmful social norms associated with Gender-based violence (GBV) and increasing confidence in services for women and girls. Therefore, the study will adapt the existing CC program based on previous learnings with adults and expand programming to include adolescent boys and girls, creating the CC adult and CC adolescent program. The CC program intervention implementation will be led by Comitato Internazionale per lo Sviluppo dei Popoli (CISP) non-Governmental Organization (NGO) in partnership with Somalia Ministry of Education and local Women led Organizations (WLO), public schools and mapped GBV and child protection (CP) service providers in Banadir and Galmudug regions of Somalia.

Johns Hopkins will collaborate with local research colleagues to evaluate the CC adult and CC adolescent program. The study will use a hybrid type 2 effectiveness-implementation design guided by the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework. Quantitative methods will be used to measure outcomes at baseline and endline (24 months post baseline) with adults and adolescents (10 and older) participants in the CC programs in intervention compared to control districts in the two regions (Banadir and Galmudug) in South Central Somalia. Quantitative methods will also be used to measure outcomes with adults and adolescents (10 years and older) community members (members that do not participate in the CC program) in intervention and control districts in the 2 regions at baseline, midline (12-months), endline (24-months) and maintenance (36 months). In addition, quantitative and qualitative methods at midline and endline will be used to measure the CC adult and CC adolescent intervention reach, adoption, implementation and maintenance in intervention districts in the two regions.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

What Works to Prevent Violence Against Women and Children (FCDO funded) has funded a collaboration between Johns Hopkins and Comitato Internazionale per lo Sviluppo dei Popoli (CISP) NGO in partnership with Somalia Ministry of Education and local researchers and Women led Organizations (WLO) to evaluate the Communities Care (CC) violence prevention intervention with both adults and adolescent in community and school-based settings in two regions of Somalia. The study will use a hybrid type 2 effectiveness-implementation design guided by the RE-AIM framework (e.g., reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation and maintenance). Quantitative methods will be used to measure violence, health and social norms outcomes with adults (18 and older) and adolescents (10 and older) with participants in CC intervention districts and control districts in the two regions (Banadir and Galmudug) in South Central Somalia. Quantitative methods will also be used to measure outcomes with adults and adolescents (10 years and older) community members (members that do not participate in the CC program) in intervention and control districts in the 2 regions at baseline, midline (12-months), endline (24-months) and maintenance (36 months). In addition, quantitative and qualitative methods at midline and endline will be used to measure the CC adult and CC adolescent intervention reach, adoption, implementation and maintenance in intervention districts in the two regions.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

3500

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria

  • Age 10 years or older
  • Participant in CC adult or CC adolescent program in collaboration with 9 public schools in districts randomized to intervention or control in two regions of Somalia
  • Living/resident of target districts (including internally displaced persons (IDPs) and does not have plans to move/leave the district or surrounding area in the next 12 months (this is critical for the longitudinal data collection with CC program participants)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Less than 10 years old
  • Not a participant in CC adult or CC adolescent
  • Not a resident of target districts-

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Communities Care
Districts in two regions of Somalia randomized to Communities Care violence prevention program with adults and adolescents
Communities Care is a violence prevention program targeting social norms and behavioral change
No Intervention: Control
Districts in two regions of Somalia randomized to control - usual programming related to prevention of violence

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Cyber-Sexual Harassment survey score
Time Frame: 9 and 12 months
Adolescent report of experience of peer-to-peer or adult on-line and in-person harassment, Mean scale score ranges from 1 to 5 with higher scores being worse outcome
9 and 12 months
Peer-to-peer physical and sexual violence in school and community survey score
Time Frame: 9 and 12 months
Adolescent report of experience of peer to peer violence in schools, Mean scale score ranges from 1 to 5 with higher scores being worse outcome
9 and 12 months
Harsh punishment in school as assessed by the Parent-Child Conflict Scale adapted for teachers
Time Frame: 9 and 12 months
Adolescent report of witness or experience harsh punishment in school using the Parent-Child Conflict Tactics Scale adapted for teachers, Mean scale score 1-5, with higher score being worse outcome
9 and 12 months
Witnessing intimate partner violence (IPV) survey score
Time Frame: 9 and 12 months
Adolescent report of witnessing IPV in the household, mean scale score ranges from 1 to 5 with higher scores being worse outcome
9 and 12 months
Harsh Punishment in Household as assessed by the Parent-Child Conflict Scale
Time Frame: 9 and 12 months
Adolescent report of witness and experience harsh punishment in household using Parent-Child Conflict Tactics Scale, mean scale score ranges from 1 to 5 with higher scores being worse outcome
9 and 12 months
IPV victimization and/or perpetration as assessed by Somalia National Survey
Time Frame: 9 and 12 months
Adult report of experience and/or perpetration of IPV, mean scale score ranges from 1 to 5 with higher scores being worse outcome
9 and 12 months
Use of Harsh Punishment in Household as assessed by the Parent-Child Conflict Tactics Scale
Time Frame: 9 and 12 months
Adult report of use of harsh punishment, mean scale score ranges from 1 to 5 with higher scores being worse outcome
9 and 12 months
Non-partner harassment as assessed by the National Somalia Survey
Time Frame: 9 and 12 months
Adult report of non-partner harassment, mean scale score ranges from 1 to 5 with higher scores being worse outcome
9 and 12 months
Non-partner physical and/or sexual violence victimization as assessed by the National Somalia Survey
Time Frame: 9 and 12 months
Adult report of physical and/or sexual violence victimization by non-partner, mean scale score ranges from 1 to 5 with higher scores being worse outcome
9 and 12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Personal Beliefs and Social Norms about Gender Based Violence as assessed by the Social Norms and Beliefs about Gender Based Violence Scale
Time Frame: 9 and 12 months
Adolescent and adult personal beliefs and social norms about gender based violence, mean scale scores range from 1-5, higher scores being worse outcome
9 and 12 months
Gender equality survey score
Time Frame: 9 and 12 months
Adult and adolescent report of equality in access to education, resources and decision making between women/girls and men/boys, mean scale score range from 1-5, higher score is worse outcome
9 and 12 months
IPV acceptability survey score
Time Frame: 9 and 12 months
Adult and adolescent report on acceptability of intimate partner violence (IPV), for example, It is justifiable for a husband to hit his wife because she argues with him, it is acceptable for a husband to force his wife to have sex when she does not want to. mean subscale score range from 1-5, higher score is worse outcome
9 and 12 months
Sexual and reproductive health knowledge and empowerment score
Time Frame: 9 and 12 months
Adolescent knowledge in the domains of puberty, female genital mutilation (FGM), child marriage, and sexually transmitted infection (STI) and empowerment measured for puberty, child marriage, FGM, PV, and contraception use, mean scale score range from 1-5, higher score is better outcomes
9 and 12 months
Confidence in service providers (adolescents and adults) score
Time Frame: 9 and 12 months
Adolescent and adult report on confidence in service providers in responding to gender based violence across several sectors (health care, justice system, elders, psychosocial services and community health workers). Mean scale score range from 1-5, higher score is better outcome
9 and 12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Nancy Glass, PhD, Johns Hopkins University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 20, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

October 31, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

November 1, 2029

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 12, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 12, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

August 15, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 13, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 11, 2026

Last Verified

February 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • IRB00418976

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Violence Prevention

Clinical Trials on Communities Care

Subscribe