- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06577480
Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of the Post-Liver Transplant Quality of Life Questionnaire
August 27, 2024 updated by: Aslihan Cakmak, Hacettepe University
Investigation of Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of the Post-Liver Transplant Quality of Life (pLTQ) Questionnaire
Liver transplantation is a crucial treatment for life-threatening liver diseases, including acute liver failure, end-stage chronic liver disease, primary liver cancers, and congenital metabolic disorders.
Quality of life in liver transplant patients is vital.
The World Health Organization defines quality of life as an individual's perception of their position in life within the context of culture, values, goals, and expectations.
Liver transplantation improves quality of life.
Recipients should be closely monitored and supported psychologically, with the effectiveness of the intervention in improving quality of life well-documented.
Saab et al. developed the post-Liver Transplantation Quality of Life (pLTQ) questionnaire, which includes eight sub-dimensions across 32 items.
To our knowledge, no Turkish-specific QoL tool for liver transplant patients currently exists.
This study aims to validate and assess the reliability of the Turkish version of the pLTQ questionnaire.
Study Overview
Status
Active, not recruiting
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Observational
Enrollment (Estimated)
80
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
-
Ankara, Turkey, 06100
- Hacettepe University Faculty of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Sampling Method
Probability Sample
Study Population
Liver transplant recipients
Description
Inclusion criteria:
- Being 18 years of age or older,
- Having received post-liver transplant treatment at Hacettepe University Adult Hospital General Surgery Units and being referred to Hacettepe University, Faculty of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation, Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation Unit after routine clinical and laboratory examinations, if deemed appropriate for the study,
- Being willing to participate in the study.
Exclusion criteria:
- Having undergone combined liver-kidney transplantation and multiple organ transplantation,
- Having uncontrolled cardiovascular and neurological problems,
- Having a cognitive problem that will prevent understanding the questionnaires,
- Not being willing to participate in the study.
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / Cohort |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Liver transplant recipients
|
No intervention
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Assessment of quality of life - disease specific
Time Frame: 1st day
|
The post-Liver Transplant Quality of Life questionnaire consists of 32 items that assess specific factors that may affect the lives of liver transplant recipients, including symptoms, mood, limitation of activities of daily living, energy level, and transplant-related care.
The items are scored on a seven-point Likert-type scale, where 1 means "always" and 7 means "never."
Each subsection score and a total score are obtained with the post-Liver Transplant Quality of Life questionnaire.
Higher values indicate higher quality of life.
|
1st day
|
|
Assessment of quality of life - general
Time Frame: 1st day
|
In order to evaluate the validity of the Turkish post-Liver Transplant Quality of Life questionnaire, the Short Form-36 will be used.
The Short Form-36 consists of eight sub-sections: physical function, social function, role restriction due to physical problems, role restriction due to emotional problems, mental health, vitality, body pain, general health, and change in health.
Each sub-score is scored between 0 and 100.
Higher scores indicate better quality of life.
|
1st day
|
|
Assessment of health profile
Time Frame: 1st day
|
In order to evaluate the validity of the Turkish post-Liver Transplant Quality of Life questionnaire, Nottingham Health Profile will be used.
Nottingham Health Profile consists of 38 items.
It has six sub-sections: energy (3 items), pain (8 items), emotional reactions (9 items), sleep (5 items), social isolation (5 items), and physical mobility (8 items).
There is a possible score range for each sub-section ranging from 0 to 100 points.
Higher scores indicate greater limitations in quality of life.
|
1st day
|
|
Psychosocial status assessment
Time Frame: 1st day
|
The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale will be used to assess the anxiety and depression levels of patients.
This scale consists of 14 items that aim to determine the risk of anxiety and depression in the patient, and to measure its level and severity change.
The scale, which is asked to be answered by taking into account the last few days, has two subscales consisting of seven separate items measuring anxiety and depression.
Higher scores indicate a better psychosocial status.
|
1st day
|
|
Fatigue assessment
Time Frame: 1st day
|
The Fatigue Severity Scale will be used to assess fatigue.
This scale questions the patient's fatigue status in the last month.
The scale, which consists of a total of 9 items, is scored on a 7-point Likert type.
The total score is calculated by taking the average of the items.
As the score increases, the patient's perception of fatigue increases.
|
1st day
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Anthropometric and clinical characteristics
Time Frame: 1st day
|
Demographic and anthropometric data of the patients, etiology of the disease (HCV, HBV, alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency, hepatosteatosis, HCC, HCC+HBV, cryptogenic, ethanol, autoimmune hepatitis, etc.), duration of the disease and waiting times on the transplant list, medications used, other accompanying problems, donor characteristics will be questioned and data on laboratory tests will be recorded from the patient files.
Risk factors such as smoking and alcohol use history, hypertension, diabetes mellitus will be questioned.
|
1st day
|
|
Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score index
Time Frame: 1st day
|
Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score index will be used to determine the severity of chronic liver disease and it will be calculated with creatinine, bilirubin, international normalized ratio (INR), sodium and albumin values routinely checked in end-stage liver patients (https://medcalculators.stanford.edu/meld).
|
1st day
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Aslihan Cakmak-Onal, PhD, PT, Hacettepe University
- Study Director: Naciye Vardar-Yagli, PhD, PT, Hacettepe University
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
General Publications
- Zigmond AS, Snaith RP. The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1983 Jun;67(6):361-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1983.tb09716.x.
- Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000 Dec 15;25(24):3186-91. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200012150-00014. No abstract available.
- Armutlu K, Korkmaz NC, Keser I, Sumbuloglu V, Akbiyik DI, Guney Z, Karabudak R. The validity and reliability of the Fatigue Severity Scale in Turkish multiple sclerosis patients. Int J Rehabil Res. 2007 Mar;30(1):81-5. doi: 10.1097/MRR.0b013e3280146ec4.
- Kucukdeveci AA, McKenna SP, Kutlay S, Gursel Y, Whalley D, Arasil T. The development and psychometric assessment of the Turkish version of the Nottingham Health Profile. Int J Rehabil Res. 2000 Mar;23(1):31-8. doi: 10.1097/00004356-200023010-00004.
- Kim WR, Mannalithara A, Heimbach JK, Kamath PS, Asrani SK, Biggins SW, Wood NL, Gentry SE, Kwong AJ. MELD 3.0: The Model for End-Stage Liver Disease Updated for the Modern Era. Gastroenterology. 2021 Dec;161(6):1887-1895.e4. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2021.08.050. Epub 2021 Sep 3.
- Mahmud N. Selection for Liver Transplantation: Indications and Evaluation. Curr Hepatol Rep. 2020;19(3):203-212. doi: 10.1007/s11901-020-00527-9. Epub 2020 Jun 19.
- Akarsu M. Liver transplantation in Turkey: The importance of experience. Turk J Gastroenterol. 2018 Nov;29(6):629-630. doi: 10.5152/tjg.2018.81018. No abstract available.
- Muller PC, Kabacam G, Vibert E, Germani G, Petrowsky H. Current status of liver transplantation in Europe. Int J Surg. 2020 Oct;82S:22-29. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.05.062. Epub 2020 May 23.
- Girgenti R, Tropea A, Buttafarro MA, Ragusa R, Ammirata M. Quality of Life in Liver Transplant Recipients: A Retrospective Study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 May 27;17(11):3809. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17113809.
- Onghena L, Develtere W, Poppe C, Geerts A, Troisi R, Vanlander A, Berrevoet F, Rogiers X, Van Vlierberghe H, Verhelst X. Quality of life after liver transplantation: State of the art. World J Hepatol. 2016 Jun 28;8(18):749-56. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v8.i18.749.
- Jay CL, Butt Z, Ladner DP, Skaro AI, Abecassis MM. A review of quality of life instruments used in liver transplantation. J Hepatol. 2009 Nov;51(5):949-59. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2009.07.010. Epub 2009 Jul 28.
- Vedadi A, Khairalla R, Che A, Nagee A, Saqib M, Ayub A, Wasim A, Macanovic S, Orchanian-Cheff A, Selzner-Malekkiani N, Bartlett S, Mucsi I. Patient-reported outcomes and patient-reported outcome measures in liver transplantation: a scoping review. Qual Life Res. 2023 Sep;32(9):2435-2445. doi: 10.1007/s11136-023-03405-1. Epub 2023 Apr 6.
- Rimmer B, Jenkins R, Russell S, Craig D, Sharp L, Exley C. Assessing quality of life in solid organ transplant recipients: A systematic review of the development, content, and quality of available condition- and transplant-specific patient-reported outcome measures. Transplant Rev (Orlando). 2024 Apr;38(2):100836. doi: 10.1016/j.trre.2024.100836. Epub 2024 Feb 13.
- Saab S, Ng V, Landaverde C, Lee SJ, Comulada WS, Arevalo J, Durazo F, Han SH, Younossi Z, Busuttil RW. Development of a disease-specific questionnaire to measure health-related quality of life in liver transplant recipients. Liver Transpl. 2011 May;17(5):567-79. doi: 10.1002/lt.22267.
- Soyyigit S, Erk M, Guler N, Kilinc G. [The value of SF-36 questionnaire for the measurement of life quality in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease]. Tuberk Toraks. 2006;54(3):259-66. Turkish.
Helpful Links
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
June 26, 2024
Primary Completion (Estimated)
June 26, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
June 26, 2026
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
August 27, 2024
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
August 27, 2024
First Posted (Actual)
August 29, 2024
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
August 29, 2024
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
August 27, 2024
Last Verified
August 1, 2024
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- SBA 24/665
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
NO
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.