KYSA-8: A Study of Anti-CD19 Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell (CD19 CAR T) Therapy, in Subjects With Treatment Refractory Stiff Person Syndrome

July 22, 2026 updated by: Kyverna Therapeutics

KYSA-8: A Phase 2 Open-Label, Single-Arm, Multicenter Study of KYV-101, an Autologous Fully Human Anti-CD19 Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell (CD19 CAR T) Therapy, in Subjects With Treatment Refractory Stiff Person Syndrome

A Study of Anti-CD19 Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Therapy for Subjects with Treatment Refractory Stiff Person Syndrome

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

Stiff person syndrome (SPS) is a rare progressive immune-mediated disorder of the central nervous system (CNS) that is characterized by progressive rigidity and painful spasms of predominantly axial and proximal limb muscles. The condition gradually worsens over time and left untreated, it can lead to permanent disability and in some cases, mortality.

B cells contribute to systemic autoimmunity and development of disease in several ways, most notably via cytokine production, antigen presentation and complement activation (via autoantibody production). In SPS, B cell involvement is supported by the presence of antibodies against glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD), which is widely expressed within the CNS, catalyzing the conversion of the excitatory neurotransmitter l-glutamate to the inhibitory GABA.

CAR-T therapy such as KYV-101 may be an effective treatment for SPS, by targeting these autoreactive B cells. Using chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell technology, engineered T cells with receptors are designed to recognize and eliminate B cells, including those that produce GAD autoantibodies. This approach aims to intervene at the root of the autoimmune response, offering a precise and potentially transformative treatment for SPS. CAR-T cell therapy holds promise as a targeted and effective intervention, addressing the autoimmune component directly and potentially halting disease progression.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

27

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Colorado
      • Aurora, Colorado, United States, 80045
        • University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus
    • Minnesota
      • Rochester, Minnesota, United States, 55905
        • Mayo Clinic
    • Pennsylvania
      • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19107
        • Thomas Jefferson University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Key Inclusion Criteria:

  • Subject must have been diagnosed SPS per the following criteria:

    • Rigidity of limb and axial (trunk) muscles prominent in the abdominal and thoracolumbar paraspinal areas and making bending difficult
    • Clinical or electrophysiological evidence of continuous contraction of agonist and antagonist muscles
    • Episodic spasms precipitated by unexpected noises, tactile stimuli, or emotional upset
    • Absence of any other neurologic disease that could explain the stiffness and rigidity
    • High titer serum anti-GAD65 antibodies shown at screening -OR- seropositive for anti-glycine antibodies. If anti-GAD65 antibodies are lower than the high titer threshold peripherally but positive in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), the subject can be included. A prior documented high titer anti-GAD65 antibody level may be acceptable subject to sponsor review.
  • Active symptoms with inadequate response to at least one immunomodulatory therapy.
  • Stiffness index ≥2.
  • At least 20 of the 25 enrolled subjects should be ambulatory.

Key Exclusion Criteria:

  • Bedridden subjects for more than 3 months.
  • History of CNS or spinal cord tumor, metabolic or infectious cause of myelopathy, genetically inherited progressive CNS disorder, sarcoidosis, non-SPS progressive neurologic condition or progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML).
  • History of stroke, seizure, dementia, Parkinson's disease, cerebellar diseases, psychosis, aphasia, and any other neurologic disorder that is of a nature and severity that the investigator considers would increase the risk for the subject.
  • Cardiac ejection fraction ≤ 40%.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: KYV-101 CAR-T cells with lymphodepletion conditioning
Dosing with KYV-101 CAR T cells
Standard lymphodepletion regimen
Other Names:
  • Cyclophosphamide
  • Fludarabine

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
To evaluate the safety of KYV-101
Time Frame: Up to 12 months
Incidence of adverse events and laboratory abnormalities
Up to 12 months
To evaluate efficacy of KYV-101
Time Frame: Up to 12 months
Change in the Timed 25-Foot Walk (T25-FW) from baseline
Up to 12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
To evaluate efficacy of KYV-101
Time Frame: Up to 12 months
Change in the scores of the distribution-of-stiffness index from baseline. Distribution of Stiffness Index: Scoring is from 0 to 6. A higher score indicates a worse outcome.
Up to 12 months
To evaluate efficacy of KYV-101
Time Frame: Up to 12 months
Change in Hauser Ambulation Index. Hauser Ambulation Index: Scoring is from 0 to 9. A higher score indicates a worse outcome.
Up to 12 months
To evaluate efficacy of KYV-101
Time Frame: Up to 12 months
Change in Heightened sensitivity scale. Heightened Sensitivity Scale: Scoring is from 0 to 7. A higher score indicates a worse outcome.
Up to 12 months
To evaluate efficacy of KYV-101
Time Frame: Up to 12 months
Change in Modified Rankin Scale from baseline Modified Rankin Scale: Scoring is from 0 (no symptoms) to 6 (death). A higher score indicates a worse outcome.
Up to 12 months

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
To evaluate efficacy of KYV-101
Time Frame: Up to 12 months
6-minute walk test
Up to 12 months
To evaluate efficacy of KYV-101
Time Frame: Up to 12 months
Change in anti-GAD-65 antibody levels
Up to 12 months
To evaluate efficacy of KYV-101
Time Frame: Up to 12 months
Change in anti-glycine receptor antibodies
Up to 12 months
To evaluate efficacy of KYV-101
Time Frame: Up to 12 months
36-Short form survey (SF-36). The SF-36 has eight scaled scores. Scores range from 0 - 100 with lower scores equating to more disability and higher scores equating to less disability.
Up to 12 months
To characterize the pharmacokinetics (PK)
Time Frame: Up to 12 months
Levels of KYV-101 CAR-positive T cells in the blood
Up to 12 months
To characterize the pharmacodynamics (PD)
Time Frame: Up to 12 months
Levels of B cells in the blood
Up to 12 months
To characterize the pharmacodynamics (PD)
Time Frame: Up to 12 months
Levels of systemic cytokine concentrations in serum
Up to 12 months
To evaluate the immunogenicity (humoral response) of KYV-101
Time Frame: Up to 12 months
Percentage of participants who develop anti-KYV-101 antibodies by immunoassays
Up to 12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: MD, Kyverna Therapeutics

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 25, 2024

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 25, 2026

Study Completion (Actual)

June 25, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 6, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 6, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

September 19, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 24, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 22, 2026

Last Verified

July 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe