- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06592677
Early Support After Exposure to Trauma (EASE)
A significant proportion of people who are exposed to traumatic events suffer from post-traumatic sequelae, such as post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Indicated preventive interventions soon after trauma could be appropriate. Yet, there is limited evidence for the efficacy of such interventions. Moreover, no evidence-based preventive interventions are readily available for victims in the aftermath of crises and disasters in Norway. Condensed Internet-delivered Prolonged Exposure (CIPE) is a preventive intervention designed for victims with symptoms of PTSD (PTSS) approximately one month after a traumatic event. The treatment is an internet-delivered, therapist assisted intervention, based on principles from Prolonged Exposure. CIPE has proven to be feasible, safe, and effective in previous studies. This study aims to test the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of CIPE in the context of psychosocial crisis services in Norwegian municipalities.
Hypotheses Effectiveness H1 Participants receiving CIPE + treatment as usual (TAU) will have significantly less PTSS than participants receiving TAU at 6 weeks post T1, and at 6-, and 12- months after the traumatic incident.
H2 Significantly fewer participants receiving CIPE+TAU will fulfill the criteria for PTSD compared to participants receiving TAU, at 6- and 12-months post trauma.
H3 Participants receiving CIPE+TAU will have significantly less symptoms of depression and insomnia than participants receiving TAU at 6 weeks post T1, and at 6-, and 12- months after the traumatic incident.
H4 Participants in the CIPE+TAU-condition will report significantly higher treatment satisfaction at post-treatment, compared to those in the TAU-condition.
H5 Participants with traumatic loss receiving CIPE+TAU will have significantly less symptoms of prolonged grief than such participants receiving TAU 12 months after the loss.
Cost-effectiveness H6 Fewer participants in the CIPE+TAU-condition will be referred to second-tier specialty mental health services, and more will achieve improved quality of life within the first year after the traumatic incident, compared to participants in the TAU-condition.
H7 The CIPE+TAU implementation is more cost-effective compared to the TAU in the short run and may even dominate TAU in the long run (i.e., more effective and less costly).
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Harald Bækkelund, PhD
- Phone Number: +47 90964268
- Email: harald.bakkelund@nkvts.no
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Marianne S Birkeland, PhD
- Phone Number: +47 41433496
- Email: m.s.birkeland@nkvts.no
Study Locations
-
-
-
Bjørkelangen, Norway
- Recruiting
- Aurskog-Høland - Psychosocial crisis team
-
Contact:
- Harald Bækkelund, PhD, clinical psych.
- Phone Number: +4790964268
- Email: harald.bakkelund@nkvts.no
-
Fredrikstad, Norway
- Recruiting
- Fredrikstad municipality - Psychosocial Crisis team
-
Contact:
- Harald Bækkelund, PhD, clinical psych.
- Phone Number: +4790964268
- Email: harald.bakkelund@nkvts.no
-
Gjøvik, Norway
- Recruiting
- Gjøvik municipality - psychosocial crisis team
-
Contact:
- Harald Bækkelund, PhD, clinical psych.
- Phone Number: +4790964268
- Email: harald.bakkelund@nkvts.no
-
Halden, Norway
- Recruiting
- Halden Municipality - psychosocial crisis team
-
Contact:
- Harald Bækkelund, PhD, clinical psych.
- Phone Number: +4790964268
- Email: harald.bakkelund@nkvts.no
-
Hamar, Norway
- Recruiting
- Hamar Municipality - psychosocial crisis team
-
Contact:
- Harald Bækkelund, PhD, clinical psych.
- Phone Number: +4790964268
- Email: harald.bakkelund@nkvts.no
-
Hov, Norway
- Recruiting
- Søndre Land municipality - psychosocial crisis team
-
Contact:
- Harald Bækkelund, PhD, clinical psych.
- Phone Number: +4790964268
- Email: harald.bakkelund@nkvts.no
-
Jessheim, Norway
- Recruiting
- Ullensaker municipality - psychosocial crisis team
-
Contact:
- Harald Bækkelund, PhD, clinical psych.
- Phone Number: +4790964268
- Email: harald.bakkelund@nkvts.no
-
Oslo, Norway
- Recruiting
- Psychosocial crisis team - Oslo, Bjerke
-
Contact:
- Harald Bækkelund, PhD, clinical psych.
- Phone Number: +4790964268
- Email: harald.bakkelund@nkvts.no
-
Oslo, Norway
- Recruiting
- Psychosocial crisis team - Oslo, Frogner
-
Contact:
- Harald Bækkelund, PhD, clinical psych.
- Phone Number: +4790964268
- Email: harald.bakkelund@nkvts.no
-
Oslo, Norway
- Recruiting
- Psychosocial crisis team - Oslo, gamle Oslo
-
Contact:
- Harald Bækkelund, PhD, clinical psych.
- Phone Number: +4790964268
- Email: harald.bakkelund@nkvts.no
-
Oslo, Norway
- Recruiting
- Psychosocial crisis team - Oslo, Grünerløkka
-
Contact:
- Harald Bækkelund, PhD, clinical psych.
- Phone Number: +4790964268
- Email: harald.bakkelund@nkvts.no
-
Oslo, Norway
- Recruiting
- Psychosocial crisis team - Oslo, Nordstrand
-
Contact:
- Harald Bækkelund, PhD, clinical psych.
- Phone Number: +4790964268
- Email: harald.bakkelund@nkvts.no
-
Oslo, Norway
- Recruiting
- Psychosocial crisis team - Oslo, Sagene
-
Contact:
- Harald Bækkelund, PhD, clinical psych.
- Phone Number: +4790964268
- Email: harald.bakkelund@nkvts.no
-
Oslo, Norway
- Recruiting
- Psychosocial crisis team - Oslo, Stovner
-
Contact:
- Harald Bækkelund, PhD, clinical psych.
- Phone Number: +4790964268
- Email: harald.bakkelund@nkvts.no
-
Oslo, Norway
- Recruiting
- Psychosocial emergency service - Oslo emergency room
-
Contact:
- Harald Bækkelund, PhD, clinical psych.
- Phone Number: +4790964268
- Email: harald.bakkelund@nkvts.no
-
Ringsaker, Norway
- Recruiting
- Ringsaker municipality - Psychosocial crisis team
-
Contact:
- Harald Bækkelund, PhD, clinical psych.
- Phone Number: +4790964268
- Email: harald.bakkelund@nkvts.no
-
Sørum, Norway
- Recruiting
- Gjerdrum - psychosocial crisis team
-
Contact:
- Harald Bækkelund, PhD, clinical psych.
- Phone Number: +4790964268
- Email: harald.bakkelund@nkvts.no
-
Teigebyen, Norway
- Recruiting
- Nannestad municipality - psychosocial crisis team
-
Contact:
- Harald Bækkelund, PhD, clinical psych.
- Phone Number: +4790964268
- Email: harald.bakkelund@nkvts.no
-
-
Asker
-
Asker, Asker, Norway, 1384
- Recruiting
- Asker municipality - Psychosocial crisis team
-
Contact:
- Harald Bækkelund, PhD, clinical psych.
- Phone Number: +4790964268
- Email: harald.bakkelund@nkvts.no
-
-
Askim
-
Askim, Askim, Norway, 1830
- Recruiting
- Psychosocial crisis team - Indre Østfold kommune
-
Contact:
- Harald Bækkelund, D.Clin.Psych, PhD
- Phone Number: +4790964268
- Email: harald.bakkelund@nkvts.no
-
-
Oslo County
-
Oslo, Oslo County, Norway, 0484
- Recruiting
- Norwegian Center for Violence and Traumatic Stress Studies
-
Contact:
- Harald Bækkelund, PhD
- Phone Number: +4790964268
- Email: harald.bakkelund@nkvts.no
-
Contact:
- Espen R Lassen, Clinical psych., phd-candidate
- Phone Number: +4791007573
-
Oslo, Oslo County, Norway, 0170
- Recruiting
- Psychosocial crisis team - Oslo, St Hanshaugen
-
Contact:
- Harald Bækkelund, PhD
- Phone Number: +4790964268
- Email: harald.bakkelund@nkvts.no
-
Oslo, Oslo County, Norway, 0377
- Recruiting
- Psychosocial crisis team - Oslo, Ullern
-
Contact:
- Harald Bækkelund, PhD
- Phone Number: +4790964268
- Email: harald.bakkelund@nkvts.no
-
Oslo, Oslo County, Norway, 0484
- Recruiting
- Psychosocial crisis team - Oslo, Nordre Aker
-
Contact:
- Harald Bækkelund, PhD
- Phone Number: +4790964268
- Email: harald.bakkelund@nkvts.no
-
Oslo, Oslo County, Norway, 0694
- Recruiting
- Psychosocial crisis team - Oslo, Østensjø
-
Contact:
- Harald Bækkelund, PhD
- Phone Number: +4790964268
- Email: harald.bakkelund@nkvts.no
-
Oslo, Oslo County, Norway, 0754
- Recruiting
- Psychosocial crisis team - Oslo, Vestre Aker
-
Contact:
- Harald Bækkelund, PhD
- Phone Number: +4790964268
- Email: harald.bakkelund@nkvts.no
-
Oslo, Oslo County, Norway, 0954
- Recruiting
- Psychosocial crisis team - Oslo, Grorud
-
Contact:
- Harald Bækkelund, PhD
- Phone Number: +4790964268
- Email: harald.bakkelund@nkvts.no
-
Oslo, Oslo County, Norway, 1051
- Recruiting
- Psychosocial crisis team - Oslo, Alna
-
Contact:
- Harald Bækkelund, PhD
- Phone Number: +4790964268
- Email: harald.bakkelund@nkvts.no
-
Oslo, Oslo County, Norway, 1203
- Recruiting
- Psychosocial crisis team - Oslo, Søndre Nordstrand
-
Contact:
- Harald Bækkelund, PhD
- Phone Number: +4790964268
- Email: harald.bakkelund@nkvts.no
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Child
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Receives support from a municipal crisis team
- Exposure to a traumatic event (as defined by criteria A for the diagnosis of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in the DSM-5) within the last seven weeks before randomization
- A total score of 10 or above on the PTSD Symptom Checklist-5 at the time of randomization
- Age 16 or above
- Written informed consent
- Writes and speaks English and/or Norwegian
Exclusion Criteria:
- Severe psychopathology in need of specialized health care (e.g., psychotic symptoms, or high suicide risk) or substance dependence syndrome in need of specialized health care
- Known or evident severe cognitive impairment
- Ongoing traumatization, violence, or threats
- Unstable dose of psychotropic medication two weeks prior to randomization
- Concurrent therapy elsewhere before randomization
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Prevention
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Condensed internet-delivered prolonged exposure (CIPE) + Treatment-as-usual (TAU)
Participants in this condition will receive Treatment-as-usual (TAU) from psychosocial crisis teams throughout the entire participation period (1 year post trauma), in addition to CIPE as an add-on lasting for six weeks after randomization (T1; randomization from 4 to 7 weeks, dependent on when the participant is recruited).
In CIPE, participants are encouraged to have daily contact with their therapist through a secured email system within the platform.
Therapists are also available for phone sessions.
Total therapist contact for each participant is generally less than 60 minutes during the whole program.
Participants are expected to work on intervention tasks for six hours each week and to complete the intervention in three weeks.
The intervention is delivered by psychosocial crisis teams' staff in 14 municipalities in the central-eastern part of Norway.
Content, frequency, and quantity of the CIPE+TAU-condition will be measured.
|
'Condensed Internet-delivered Prolonged Exposure' (CIPE) is an intervention designed for victims with symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) soon after a traumatic incident.
CIPE is a therapist-supported intervention that consists of four modules delivered over the internet.
Central CIPE-interventions include psychoeducation of normal post-traumatic reactions, in-vivo exposure, imaginary exposure, and a breathing exercise.
There is currently considerable heterogeneity regarding the interventional principles applied in the Treatment-as-usual (TAU) condition across municipal crisis teams.
The national guidelines (The Norwegian Directorate of Health, 2016), recommends several interventional principles such as psychological first aid (PFA), psychoeducation regarding crisis reactions/symptoms of acute stress, normalization of such reactions, activation of social support, and practical assistance.
|
|
Active Comparator: Treatment-as-usual (TAU) only
Participants in this condition will receive Treatment-as-usual (TAU) throughout the entire participation period (1 year post trauma).
The TAU-condition is delivered by the same municipality psychosocial crisis teams as the Condensed internet-delivered prolonged exposure (CIPE) +TAU arm.
The crisis teams follow a national guideline (The Norwegian Directorate of Health, 2016), recommending proactive contact with victims, screening for psychosocial difficulties, and offering interventions to individuals with significant levels of trauma-related problems.
Most municipalities organize interdisciplinary crisis services consisting of physicians, police, priests, nurses, and psychologists who receive referrals from emergency services after a traumatic event.
There is currently considerable heterogeneity in the frequenzy and quantity of intervention across municipalities.
|
There is currently considerable heterogeneity regarding the interventional principles applied in the Treatment-as-usual (TAU) condition across municipal crisis teams.
The national guidelines (The Norwegian Directorate of Health, 2016), recommends several interventional principles such as psychological first aid (PFA), psychoeducation regarding crisis reactions/symptoms of acute stress, normalization of such reactions, activation of social support, and practical assistance.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5; Norwegian version)
Time Frame: Post-treatment (10 - 13 weeks after trauma)
|
20-item questionnaire that measures DSM-5-specified symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD).
The total score ranges from 0 to 80, with higher scores indicating more severe symptoms.
Items are rated on a 0 ("not at all") to 4 ("extremely") Likert type scale.
The PCL-5 has demonstrated satisfactory psychometric properties in various trauma populations.
This study will administer a Norwegian version of the PCL-5.
Recall period: one month.
|
Post-treatment (10 - 13 weeks after trauma)
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5; Norwegian version)
Time Frame: 6 months follow-up
|
20-item questionnaire that measures DSM-5-specified symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD).
The total score ranges from 0 to 80, with higher scores indicating more severe symptoms.
Items are rated on a 0 ("not at all") to 4 ("extremely") Likert type scale.
The PCL-5 has demonstrated satisfactory psychometric properties in various trauma populations.
This study will administer a Norwegian version of the PCL-5.
Recall period: one month.
|
6 months follow-up
|
|
PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5; Norwegian version)
Time Frame: 12 months follow-up
|
20-item questionnaire that measures DSM-5-specified symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD).
The total score ranges from 0 to 80, with higher scores indicating more severe symptoms.
Items are rated on a 0 ("not at all") to 4 ("extremely") Likert type scale.
The PCL-5 has demonstrated satisfactory psychometric properties in various trauma populations.
This study will administer a Norwegian version of the PCL-5.
Recall period: one month.
|
12 months follow-up
|
|
Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale for DSM-5 (CAPS-5; Norwegian version)
Time Frame: 6-months follow-up
|
30-item structured interview, developed to assess current and life-time post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD)-diagnosis, as well as past-week PTSD symptoms.
The instrument measures the 20 DSM-5 PTSD-symptoms, in addition to the onset and duration of symptoms, related subjective distress and functional impairment (social, occupational), amongst other aspects of the disorder.
Standardized questions and probes are provided.
A Norwegian version of the CAPS-5 are administered.
CAPS-5 has demonstrated excellent psychometric properties.
|
6-months follow-up
|
|
Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale for DSM-5 (CAPS-5; Norwegian version)
Time Frame: 12-months follow-up
|
30-item structured interview, developed to assess current and life-time post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD)-diagnosis, as well as past-week PTSD symptoms.
The instrument measures the 20 DSM-5 PTSD-symptoms, in addition to the onset and duration of symptoms, related subjective distress and functional impairment (social, occupational), amongst other aspects of the disorder.
Standardized questions and probes are provided.
A Norwegian version of the CAPS-5 are administered.
CAPS-5 has demonstrated excellent psychometric properties.
|
12-months follow-up
|
|
Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9; Norwegian version)
Time Frame: 6-months follow-up
|
9-item self-report measure of depressive symptom severity.
The recall period is 2 weeks.
Response is given on a 4-point Likert scale (0: not at all, 1: several days, 2: more than half the days, and 3: nearly every day), resulting in the total score ranging from 0 to 27.
Higher scores indicate higher symptom severity.
The instrument is sensitive for both clinical- and sub-clinical levels of depressive symptoms, and have demonstrated favorable psychometric properties.
A validated Norwegian version of the PHQ-9 is applied.
|
6-months follow-up
|
|
Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9; Norwegian version)
Time Frame: 12-months follow-up
|
9-item self-report measure of depressive symptom severity.
The recall period is 2 weeks.
Response is given on a 4-point Likert scale (0: not at all, 1: several days, 2: more than half the days, and 3: nearly every day), resulting in the total score ranging from 0 to 27.
Higher scores indicate higher symptom severity.
The instrument is sensitive for both clinical- and sub-clinical levels of depressive symptoms, and have demonstrated favorable psychometric properties.
A validated Norwegian version of the PHQ-9 is applied.
|
12-months follow-up
|
|
Insomnia Severity Index (ISI; Norwegian version)
Time Frame: 6-months follow-up
|
7-item questionnaire, which measures insomnia symptoms during the past two weeks.
The instrument utilizes a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 0 to 4, yielding a total score of 0-28.
Higher scores indicate more insomnia symptoms.
The ISI has demonstrated favorable psychometric properties.
A Norwegian version of the ISI is applied.
|
6-months follow-up
|
|
Insomnia Severity Index (ISI; Norwegian version)
Time Frame: 12-months follow-up
|
7-item questionnaire, which measures insomnia symptoms during the past two weeks.
The instrument utilizes a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 0 to 4, yielding a total score of 0-28.
Higher scores indicate more insomnia symptoms.
The ISI has demonstrated favorable psychometric properties.
A Norwegian version of the ISI is applied.
|
12-months follow-up
|
|
EQ-5D-5L (Norwegian version)
Time Frame: 6-months follow-up
|
Self-reported health-related quality of life.
Self-care, mobility, pain/discomfort, usual activities, and anxiety/depression are measured on a 5-point scale.
Response to each item is given by checking off one of five descriptions of functionality in that domain (e.g., have no problems doing my usual activities, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems, or unable to do my usual activities).
The total score ranges from 5 to 25, with higher scores indicating poorer health-related quality of life.
Participant also rate their overall health on a scale from 1 (worst health) to 100 (best health).
This scale is called the EQ VAS and is a part of the EQ-5D-5L.
The instrument has demonstrated excellent psychometric properties.
Recall period: today.
|
6-months follow-up
|
|
EQ-5D-5L (Norwegian version)
Time Frame: 12-months follow-up
|
Self-reported health-related quality of life.
Self-care, mobility, pain/discomfort, usual activities, and anxiety/depression are measured on a 5-point scale.
Response to each item is given by checking off one of five descriptions of functionality in that domain (e.g., have no problems doing my usual activities, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems, or unable to do my usual activities).
The total score ranges from 5 to 25, with higher scores indicating poorer health-related quality of life.
Participant also rate their overall health on a scale from 1 (worst health) to 100 (best health).
This scale is called the EQ VAS and is a part of the EQ-5D-5L.
The instrument has demonstrated excellent psychometric properties.
Recall period: today.
|
12-months follow-up
|
|
The Recovering Quality of Life (ReQoL; Norwegian version)
Time Frame: 6-months follow-up
|
Validated 10-item self-report measure of quality of life specific to people with different mental health conditions.
The total score ranges from 0 to 40, with lower scores indicating low quality of life.
The scale has demonstrated excellent psychometric properties.
|
6-months follow-up
|
|
The Recovering Quality of Life (ReQoL; Norwegian version)
Time Frame: 12-months follow-up
|
Validated 10-item self-report measure of quality of life specific to people with different mental health conditions.
The total score ranges from 0 to 40, with lower scores indicating low quality of life.
The scale has demonstrated excellent psychometric properties.
|
12-months follow-up
|
|
Traumatic grief inventory self report, TGI-SR+
Time Frame: 12-months follow-up
|
The TGI-SR+ is a 22-item self-report questionnaire to assess symptoms of DSM-5 persistent complex bereavement disorder (PCBD), and ICD-11 Prolonged grief disorder (PGD).
Total score ranges from 22 to 110, with higher scores indicating more severe symptoms.
The instrument has demonstrated good psychometric properties.
Recall period: last month.
|
12-months follow-up
|
|
Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9; Norwegian version)
Time Frame: Post-treatment (10 - 13 weeks after trauma)
|
9-item self-report measure of depressive symptom severity.
The recall period is 2 weeks.
Response is given on a 4-point Likert scale (0: not at all, 1: several days, 2: more than half the days, and 3: nearly every day), resulting in the total score ranging from 0 to 27.
Higher scores indicate higher symptom severity.
The instrument is sensitive for both clinical- and sub-clinical levels of depressive symptoms, and have demonstrated favorable psychometric properties.
A validated Norwegian version of the PHQ-9 is applied.
|
Post-treatment (10 - 13 weeks after trauma)
|
|
Insomnia Severity Index (ISI; Norwegian version)
Time Frame: Post-treatment (10 - 13 weeks after trauma)
|
7-item questionnaire, which measures insomnia symptoms during the past two weeks.
The instrument utilizes a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 0 to 4, yielding a total score of 0-28.
Higher scores indicate more insomnia symptoms.
The ISI has demonstrated favorable psychometric properties.
A Norwegian version of the ISI is applied.
|
Post-treatment (10 - 13 weeks after trauma)
|
|
Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ-8; Norwegian version)
Time Frame: Post-treatment (10 - 13 weeks after trauma)
|
Eight-item measure of participants' service satisfaction.
Response is given on a scale ranging from one to four, with a resulting total score range from eight to 32.
Higher scores suggest higher service satisfaction.
A validated Norwegian version of the CSQ-8 will be applied.
|
Post-treatment (10 - 13 weeks after trauma)
|
|
EQ-5D-5L (Norwegian version)
Time Frame: Post-treatment (10 - 13 weeks after trauma)
|
Self-reported health-related quality of life.
Self-care, mobility, pain/discomfort, usual activities, and anxiety/depression are measured on a 5-point scale.
Response to each item is given by checking off one of five descriptions of functionality in that domain (e.g., have no problems doing my usual activities, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems, or unable to do my usual activities).
The total score ranges from 5 to 25, with higher scores indicating poorer health-related quality of life.
Participant also rate their overall health on a scale from 1 (worst health) to 100 (best health).
This scale is called the EQ VAS and is a part of the EQ-5D-5L.
The instrument has demonstrated excellent psychometric properties.
Recall period: today.
|
Post-treatment (10 - 13 weeks after trauma)
|
|
The Recovering Quality of Life (ReQoL; Norwegian version)
Time Frame: Post-treatment (10 - 13 weeks after trauma)
|
Validated 10-item self-report measure of quality of life specific to people with different mental health conditions.
The total score ranges from 0 to 40, with lower scores indicating low quality of life.
The scale has demonstrated excellent psychometric properties.
|
Post-treatment (10 - 13 weeks after trauma)
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Self-reported work absence and use of health services
Time Frame: Post-treatment (10 weeks after trauma)
|
Unvalidated questionnaire measuring job status, number of days on sick leave, annually household income, number of consultations with different types of health professionals, number of days admitted to inpatient psychiatric care, and psychotropic medication.
Work absence and the type and quantity of services will be transformed to reflect costs related to services used, using cost units from the corresponding financial years.
Recall period: 6 weeks (except annual income).
|
Post-treatment (10 weeks after trauma)
|
|
Self-reported work absence and use of health services
Time Frame: 6-months follow-up
|
Unvalidated questionnaire measuring job status, number of days on sick leave, annually household income, number of consultations with different types of health professionals, number of days admitted to inpatient psychiatric care, and psychotropic medication.
Work absence and the type and quantity of services will be transformed to reflect costs related to services used, using cost units from the corresponding financial years.
Recall period: 3,5 months (except annual income).
|
6-months follow-up
|
|
Self-reported work absence and use of health services
Time Frame: 12-months follow-up
|
Unvalidated questionnaire measuring job status, number of days on sick leave, annually household income, number of consultations with different types of health professionals, number of days admitted to inpatient psychiatric care, and psychotropic medication.
Work absence and the type and quantity of services will be transformed to reflect costs related to services used, using cost units from the corresponding financial years.
Recall period: 6 months (except annual income).
|
12-months follow-up
|
|
Clinician-reported use of municipality health services
Time Frame: 2-months follow-up (2 months after trauma)
|
Unvalidated questionnaire where clinicians in the municipality health services register date and place of consultation, type of health service, the clinician's profession, content, total minutes used, and any referral to other health services.
Use of municipality health services will be transformed to reflect costs related to services used, using cost units from the corresponding financial years.
Recall period: 1 month.
|
2-months follow-up (2 months after trauma)
|
|
Clinician-reported use of municipality health services
Time Frame: 3-months follow-up (3 months after trauma)
|
Unvalidated questionnaire where clinicians in the municipality health services register date and place of consultation, type of health service, the clinician's profession, content, total minutes used, and any referral to other health services.
Use of municipality health services will be transformed to reflect costs related to services used, using cost units from the corresponding financial years.
Recall period: 1 month.
|
3-months follow-up (3 months after trauma)
|
|
Clinician-reported use of municipality health services
Time Frame: 4-months follow-up (4 months after trauma)
|
Unvalidated questionnaire where clinicians in the municipality health services register date and place of consultation, type of health service, the clinician's profession, content, total minutes used, and any referral to other health services.
Use of municipality health services will be transformed to reflect costs related to services used, using cost units from the corresponding financial years.
Recall period: 1 month.
|
4-months follow-up (4 months after trauma)
|
|
Clinician-reported use of municipality health services
Time Frame: 5-months follow-up (5 months after trauma)
|
Unvalidated questionnaire where clinicians in the municipality health services register date and place of consultation, type of health service, the clinician's profession, content, total minutes used, and any referral to other health services.
Use of municipality health services will be transformed to reflect costs related to services used, using cost units from the corresponding financial years.
Recall period: 1 month.
|
5-months follow-up (5 months after trauma)
|
|
Clinician-reported use of municipality health services
Time Frame: 6-months follow-up (6 months after trauma)
|
Unvalidated questionnaire where clinicians in the municipality health services register date and place of consultation, type of health service, the clinician's profession, content, total minutes used, and any referral to other health services.
Use of municipality health services will be transformed to reflect costs related to services used, using cost units from the corresponding financial years.
Recall period: 1 month.
|
6-months follow-up (6 months after trauma)
|
|
Clinician-reported use of municipality health services
Time Frame: 7-months follow-up (7 months after trauma)
|
Unvalidated questionnaire where clinicians in the municipality health services register date and place of consultation, type of health service, the clinician's profession, content, total minutes used, and any referral to other health services.
Use of municipality health services will be transformed to reflect costs related to services used, using cost units from the corresponding financial years.
Recall period: 1 month.
|
7-months follow-up (7 months after trauma)
|
|
Clinician-reported use of municipality health services
Time Frame: 8-months follow-up (8 months after trauma)
|
Unvalidated questionnaire where clinicians in the municipality health services register date and place of consultation, type of health service, the clinician's profession, content, total minutes used, and any referral to other health services.
Use of municipality health services will be transformed to reflect costs related to services used, using cost units from the corresponding financial years.
Recall period: 1 month.
|
8-months follow-up (8 months after trauma)
|
|
Clinician-reported use of municipality health services
Time Frame: 9-months follow-up (9 months after trauma)
|
Unvalidated questionnaire where clinicians in the municipality health services register date and place of consultation, type of health service, the clinician's profession, content, total minutes used, and any referral to other health services.
Use of municipality health services will be transformed to reflect costs related to services used, using cost units from the corresponding financial years.
Recall period: 1 month.
|
9-months follow-up (9 months after trauma)
|
|
Clinician-reported use of municipality health services
Time Frame: 10-months follow-up (10 months after trauma)
|
Unvalidated questionnaire where clinicians in the municipality health services register date and place of consultation, type of health service, the clinician's profession, content, total minutes used, and any referral to other health services.
Use of municipality health services will be transformed to reflect costs related to services used, using cost units from the corresponding financial years.
Recall period: 1 month.
|
10-months follow-up (10 months after trauma)
|
|
Clinician-reported use of municipality health services
Time Frame: 11-months follow-up (11 months after trauma)
|
Unvalidated questionnaire where clinicians in the municipality health services register date and place of consultation, type of health service, the clinician's profession, content, total minutes used, and any referral to other health services.
Use of municipality health services will be transformed to reflect costs related to services used, using cost units from the corresponding financial years.
Recall period: 1 month.
|
11-months follow-up (11 months after trauma)
|
|
Clinician-reported use of municipality health services
Time Frame: 12-months follow-up (12 months after trauma)
|
Unvalidated questionnaire where clinicians in the municipality health services register date and place of consultation, type of health service, the clinician's profession, content, total minutes used, and any referral to other health services.
Use of municipality health services will be transformed to reflect costs related to services used, using cost units from the corresponding financial years.
Recall period: 1 month.
|
12-months follow-up (12 months after trauma)
|
|
Registry data on use of specialist health services
Time Frame: 12-months follow-up
|
Registry data from the Norwegian Patient Registry (NPR) on referrals to specialist health services, date of consultation, type of consultation, diagnostic information.
|
12-months follow-up
|
|
Registry data on use of health services
Time Frame: 12-months follow-up
|
Registry data from municipality patient' and user registry (KPR) on consultations with general practitioners and acute health services, date of consultation, type of consultation, diagnostic information.
|
12-months follow-up
|
|
Registry data on use of health service and work absence
Time Frame: 12-months follow-up
|
Registry data on work absence/received social security (FD-Trygd).
|
12-months follow-up
|
|
Mild-moderate adverse events questionnaire
Time Frame: Post-treatment (10 - 13 weeks after trauma)
|
Severe adverse events are monitored and addressed continuously, and will be reported.
Mild-moderate adverse events (AE) are reported on an unvalidated generic questionnaire, utilized in previous studies.
Participants are asked to report experiences of AEs, and to describe the event briefly, report number of weeks after the traumatic event when the AE took place, frequency, and duration of the AE, and how the AE impacted quality of life when it occurred and today.
The participants are also asked to report an appraisal of whether the AE was associated with receiving Condensed internet-delivered prolonged exposure (CIPE).
Recall period: last 6 weeks.
|
Post-treatment (10 - 13 weeks after trauma)
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Harald Bækkelund, PhD, Norwegian Center for Violence and Traumatic Stress Studies
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB. The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure. J Gen Intern Med. 2001 Sep;16(9):606-13. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016009606.x.
- Bastien CH, Vallieres A, Morin CM. Validation of the Insomnia Severity Index as an outcome measure for insomnia research. Sleep Med. 2001 Jul;2(4):297-307. doi: 10.1016/s1389-9457(00)00065-4.
- Morin CM, Belleville G, Belanger L, Ivers H. The Insomnia Severity Index: psychometric indicators to detect insomnia cases and evaluate treatment response. Sleep. 2011 May 1;34(5):601-8. doi: 10.1093/sleep/34.5.601.
- Weathers FW, Bovin MJ, Lee DJ, Sloan DM, Schnurr PP, Kaloupek DG, Keane TM, Marx BP. The Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale for DSM-5 (CAPS-5): Development and initial psychometric evaluation in military veterans. Psychol Assess. 2018 Mar;30(3):383-395. doi: 10.1037/pas0000486. Epub 2017 May 11.
- Blevins CA, Weathers FW, Davis MT, Witte TK, Domino JL. The Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5): Development and Initial Psychometric Evaluation. J Trauma Stress. 2015 Dec;28(6):489-98. doi: 10.1002/jts.22059. Epub 2015 Nov 25.
- Marx BP, Lee DJ, Norman SB, Bovin MJ, Sloan DM, Weathers FW, Keane TM, Schnurr PP. Reliable and clinically significant change in the clinician-administered PTSD Scale for DSM-5 and PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 among male veterans. Psychol Assess. 2022 Feb;34(2):197-203. doi: 10.1037/pas0001098. Epub 2021 Dec 23.
- Keetharuth AD, Brazier J, Connell J, Bjorner JB, Carlton J, Taylor Buck E, Ricketts T, McKendrick K, Browne J, Croudace T, Barkham M. Recovering Quality of Life (ReQoL): a new generic self-reported outcome measure for use with people experiencing mental health difficulties. Br J Psychiatry. 2018 Jan;212(1):42-49. doi: 10.1192/bjp.2017.10.
- Feng YS, Kohlmann T, Janssen MF, Buchholz I. Psychometric properties of the EQ-5D-5L: a systematic review of the literature. Qual Life Res. 2021 Mar;30(3):647-673. doi: 10.1007/s11136-020-02688-y. Epub 2020 Dec 7.
- American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596
- Mekawi Y, Silverstein MW, Walker A, Ishiekwene M, Carter S, Michopoulos V, Stevens JS, Powers A. Examining the psychometric properties of the PCL-5 in a black community sample using item response theory. J Anxiety Disord. 2022 Apr;87:102555. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2022.102555. Epub 2022 Mar 10.
- Sveen J, Bondjers K, Willebrand M. Psychometric properties of the PTSD Checklist for DSM-5: a pilot study. Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2016 Apr 19;7:30165. doi: 10.3402/ejpt.v7.30165. eCollection 2016.
- Brattmyr M, Lindberg MS, Solem S, Hjemdal O, Havnen A. Factor structure, measurement invariance, and concurrent validity of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 and the Generalized Anxiety Disorder scale-7 in a Norwegian psychiatric outpatient sample. BMC Psychiatry. 2022 Jul 11;22(1):461. doi: 10.1186/s12888-022-04101-z.
- Wisting L, Johnson SU, Bulik CM, Andreassen OA, Ro O, Bang L. Psychometric properties of the Norwegian version of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) in a large female sample of adults with and without eating disorders. BMC Psychiatry. 2021 Jan 5;21(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s12888-020-03013-0.
- Pedersen H, Havnen A, Brattmyr M, Attkisson CC, Lara-Cabrera ML. A digital Norwegian version of the client satisfaction questionnaire 8: factor validity and internal reliability in outpatient mental health care. BMC Psychiatry. 2022 Oct 31;22(1):671. doi: 10.1186/s12888-022-04281-8.
- Lenferink LIM, Eisma MC, Smid GE, de Keijser J, Boelen PA. Valid measurement of DSM-5 persistent complex bereavement disorder and DSM-5-TR and ICD-11 prolonged grief disorder: The Traumatic Grief Inventory-Self Report Plus (TGI-SR+). Compr Psychiatry. 2022 Jan;112:152281. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2021.152281. Epub 2021 Oct 21.
- Buysse DJ, Ancoli-Israel S, Edinger JD, Lichstein KL, Morin CM. Recommendations for a standard research assessment of insomnia. Sleep. 2006 Sep;29(9):1155-73. doi: 10.1093/sleep/29.9.1155.
- Bragesjo M, Arnberg FK, Olofsdotter Lauri K, Aspvall K, Sarnholm J, Andersson E. Condensed Internet-delivered prolonged exposure provided soon after trauma: a randomised trial. Psychol Med. 2023 Apr;53(5):1989-1998. doi: 10.1017/S0033291721003706. Epub 2021 Sep 14.
- Lassen ER, Birkeland MS, Egeland K, Stene LE, Brodersen D, Ekornas B, Reinholdt NP, Kjerstad E, Lamu AN, Aarons GA, Crable EL, Bragesjo M, Baekkelund H. Early Support after Exposure to Trauma (EASE): protocol for a hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial of an internet-based intervention for PTSD prevention. Trials. 2026 Feb 5;27(1):196. doi: 10.1186/s13063-026-09502-z.
Helpful Links
- The Norwegian Directorate of Health. (2016). National guidelines for psychosocial support in the aftermath of crises and catastrophes
- Heir, T. (2014). PCL-5. Norwegian centre for violence and traumatic stress studies.
- Bækkelund, H., Aareskjold, J., & Endsjø, M. (2015). KLINIKERADMINISTRERT PTSD-SKALA FOR DSM-5: Versjon for vurdering av siste måned. Norwegian Centre for Violence and Traumatic Stress Studies.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 302302
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
IPD Sharing Time Frame
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type
- STUDY_PROTOCOL
- ANALYTIC_CODE
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Post-traumatic Stress Disorder
-
Acacia ClinicsElectroCore INC; Vagus Nerve SocietyRecruitingPTSD | Post Traumatic Stress Disorder | Post Traumatic Stress Disorders | Post-traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) | Post Traumatic Stress Disorder PTSD | PTSD - Post Traumatic Stress Disorder | Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder, PTSDUnited States
-
University of LuxembourgQuresta, Inc.; National Psychological Association of Ukraine; Veteran Mental...RecruitingPost Traumatic Stress Disorder | Post Traumatic Stress Disorder PTSD | Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder, PTSDUkraine
-
Istanbul UniversityRecruitingComplex Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (CPTSD) | Post-traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD)Turkey
-
Istanbul UniversityRecruitingComplex Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (CPTSD) | Post-traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD)Turkey
-
University of California, Los AngelesDefense Advanced Research Projects Agency; Defense Group, Inc.CompletedPost-traumatic Stress Disorder | Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder, ChronicUnited States
-
University of California, Los AngelesWithdrawnPost-traumatic Stress Disorder | Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder in ChildrenUnited States
-
IWK Health CentreRecruitingPost-Traumatic Stress Disorder in Adolescence | Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder, PTSD | Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder in YouthCanada
-
Weill Medical College of Cornell UniversityCompletedPost-traumatic Stress Disorder | Complex Post-Traumatic Stress DisorderUnited States
-
University of UtahEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development...CompletedPost-Traumatic Stress Disorder in Children | Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder in AdolescenceUnited States
-
University of ZurichCompletedPost Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) | Complex Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (CPTSD)Switzerland
Clinical Trials on Condensed internet-delivered prolonged exposure (CIPE)
-
Karolinska InstitutetTraumamottagning Centrum för Sexuell Hälsa, Skånes Universitetssjukhus, MalmöNot yet recruitingPost Traumatic Stress Disorder | Acute Stress DisorderSweden
-
Karolinska InstitutetKarolinska UniversitetssjukhusetNot yet recruitingPost Traumatic Stress Disorder | Acute Stress DisorderSweden
-
Karolinska InstitutetRegion StockholmCompleted
-
Karolinska InstitutetRegion StockholmRecruitingPost Traumatic Stress DisorderSweden
-
Karolinska InstitutetRecruiting
-
University of PennsylvaniaUniversity of Texas; VA Palo Alto Health Care SystemCompletedPosttraumatic Stress Disorders | Combat DisordersUnited States
-
Karolinska InstitutetRegion StockholmRecruitingPost Traumatic Stress DisorderSweden
-
Karolinska InstitutetCompletedIrritable Bowel Syndrome | Functional Gastrointestinal DisordersSweden
-
Karolinska InstitutetCompletedDyspepsia | Irritable Bowel Syndrome | Functional Abdominal Pain | Functional Gastrointestinal DisordersSweden
-
University of PennsylvaniaUniversity of Texas; VA Palo Alto Health Care SystemCompletedPosttraumatic Stress Disorder | Combat DisordersUnited States