Allogenic Adipose Tissue-derived Mesenchymal Stromal Cells for the Treatment of Primary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis (MAESTRO-4MS)

December 31, 2025 updated by: Rennes University Hospital

Allogenic Adipose Tissue-derived Mesenchymal Stromal Cells for the Treatment of Primary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis: an Open-label Phase I Clinical Trial.

In this study, we propose, for the first time, to test the safety and the potential efficacy of repeated allogenic Adipose tissue-derived Mesenchymal Stromal Cells IT injections in Primary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis patients.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

In this study, the investigators propose, for the first time, to test the safety and the potential efficacy of repeated allogenic Adipose tissue-derived Mesenchymal Stromal Cells (ASCs) IT injections in Primary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis (PPMS) patients. In fact, even if autologous Bone Marrow-Mesenchymal Stromal Cells (BM-MSC) and ASCs have already been infused intrathecally in multiple sclerosis, repeated injections of allogenic ASCs have never been tested in this disease. The use of allogenic cells is driven by recent publications reporting decreased suppressive properties of autologous MSC from MS patients.

The hypothesis is that 3 repeated intrathecal (IT) injections of allogenic ASCs every 3 months will be safe and can lower disease progression in PPMS patients.

Preamble of infusing ASCs in the first patient, it's necessary to constitute and characterize the ASC bank. ASC will be obtained from Allogeneic human mesenchymal stromal cells derived from adipose tissue of a living donor.

Once the bank is available, MS patients will be screened and included in Rennes university hospital to received ASC's infusions.

MS patients will be followed for one year after inclusion

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

10

Phase

  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Créteil, France
        • Active, not recruiting
        • APHP Henri Mondor
      • Rennes, France
        • Recruiting
        • CHU Rennes
        • Contact:
          • Laure MICHEL, Pr
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Laure MICHEL, Pr

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient with Primary Progressive MS according to the criteria of Mc Donald 2017 (Thompson et al Lancet neurol, 2017)
  • Age between 18 and 55 years
  • EDSS score: 3 to 6 at inclusion
  • Documented evidence of disability progression independent of relapse activity at any point in time over the 2 years prior to the screening visit
  • Positive CSF with oligoclonal bands
  • For women of childbearing potential (WOCBP), effective contraception as per the CFTG recommendations (version 1.1)
  • Having signed a free, informed and written consent
  • Affiliated to social security scheme

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Inflammatory activity during the past year (relapses or new T2 MRI lesions)
  • Disease Modifying Drugs during the past year
  • Treatment with high dose corticosteroids during the 30 days preceding the inclusion
  • Contra indication to lumbar puncture/intrathecal infusion: intracranial hypertension, puncture site infections, severe thrombocytopenia (<50 G/L), anticoagulant or fibrinolytic treatment
  • Participation in another therapeutic trial in the last 6 months
  • Adults under legal protection (safeguard of justice, curatorship, guardianship), persons deprived of their liberty, pregnant or breastfeeding women, minors, persons unable to express their consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Patient
repeated allogenic ASCs IT injections
repeated allogenic ASCs IT injections

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of patients experiencing at least one adverse effect
Time Frame: 48 weeks
Percentage of patients experiencing at least one adverse effect (AE) due to ASC infusion qualified as CTCAE V5 grade ≥ 3 or qualified as "serious" AE using the MeDRA terminology, and occurring between the first infusion and the end of the follow-up. The severity of the AE and the causality of the ASC infusion will be validated by a DSMB
48 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Description of Adverse events related to experimental product
Time Frame: 48 weeks
Number and description of AE (related to the experimental product) using MedDRA terminology and CTCAE V5 at each time point during the study
48 weeks
Clinical disease evolution at Week24 and Week48 after treatment : Confirmed Disability Progression using Expanded Disability Status Scale score
Time Frame: 3 months

Percentage of patients with 3-months Confirmed Disability Progression (CDP) between W0 and W24-W48. Disability progression will be defined as an increase of 1pt Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS).

The Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) is a method of quantifying disability in multiple sclerosis and monitoring changes in the level of disability over time. It is widely used in clinical trials and in the assessment of people with MS.

(Disability progression will be defined as an increase of 1.5 pt if baseline EDSS=0, 1pt EDSS (if baseline 1 ≤ EDSS<6), or an increase of 0.5pt if baseline EDSS is ≥ 6; confirmed at 6 months.) EDSS : Minimum Score 1, Maximum score 10, higher scores mean a worse outcome.

3 months
Clinical disease evolution at Week24 and Week48 after treatment : Expanded Disability Status Scale score
Time Frame: 48 weeks
Mean change in EDSS score between W0 and W24-W48. Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS). The Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) is a method of quantifying disability in multiple sclerosis and monitoring changes in the level of disability over time. It is widely used in clinical trials and in the assessment of people with MS.(Disability progression will be defined as an increase of 1.5 pt if baseline EDSS=0, 1pt EDSS (if baseline 1 ≤ EDSS<6), or an increase of 0.5pt if baseline EDSS is ≥ 6; confirmed at 6 months.) EDSS : Minimum Score 1, Maximum score 10, higher scores mean a worse outcome.
48 weeks
Clinical disease evolution at Week24 and Week48 after treatment : Expanded Disability Status Scale score
Time Frame: 48 weeks

Percentage of patients with No Evidence of Progression (NEP): Evidence of Progression is defined by (1) EDSS progression confirmed at 3 months,

The Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) is a method of quantifying disability in multiple sclerosis and monitoring changes in the level of disability over time. It is widely used in clinical trials and in the assessment of people with MS.

EDSS : Minimum Score 1, Maximum score 10, higher scores mean a worse outcome.

48 weeks
Clinical disease evolution at Week24 and Week48 after treatment : no evidence progression using 9HPT test
Time Frame: 48 weeks

Percentage of patients with No Evidence of Progression (NEP): Evidence of Progression is defined by increase of at least 20% in the 9-Hole Peg Test -9HPT.

9HPT Nine-Hole Peg Test It is a quantitative measure of hand function and is tested with the nine-hole peg test. The patient is instructed to arrange pegs into nine holes in a board by both dominant and non-dominant hands in two consecutive trials for each hand. The amount of time (in seconds) required to place and remove all nine pegs is recorded for each trial.

48 weeks
Clinical disease evolution at Week24 and Week48 after treatment : no evidence progression using T25-FW
Time Frame: 48 weeks

Percentage of patients with No Evidence of Progression (NEP): Evidence of Progression is defined by increase of at least 20% in the Timed-25 Foot Walk -T25W

T25W Timed 25-foot walk test (T25W) The timed 25-foot walk test (T25W) is a quantitative measure of ambulation. The T25W is a reliable test for patients with more severe gait impairment because it primarily assesses walking speed. The patient is instructed to walk a distance of 25 feet as quickly as possible. Both ends are marked with prominent signs. Note, if the patient requires his/her assistive device while walking. As the patient completes trail 1 he/she is instructed to walk back to the starting point. The time will be recorded in seconds in both trials. Time limit = 180 seconds (3 minutes). Discontinued = Patient is unable to complete a trial in 3 minutes or completes the first trial but cannot complete trial 2 after a 5-minute rest period.

48 weeks
Clinical disease evolution at Week24 and Week48 after treatment : MSFC mean changes
Time Frame: 48 weeks

Mean change in MSFC composite score ((include -T25W, -9HPT- and PASAT-3)

The Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite (MSFC) was designed by "The National MS Society's Clinical Outcome Assessment Task" and is a standardized tool used to quantify the degree of disability in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS)

48 weeks
Quality of life disease evolution at Week24 and Week48 after treatment : Multiple Sclerosis International Quality Of Life (MusiQoL) questionnaire
Time Frame: 48 weeks

Change in the MusiQOL score

The MusiQoL is a specific questionnaire comprising 31 questions describing nine dimensions of quality of life (Appendix 1):

activities of daily living (eight items); psychological well-being (four); relationships with friends (four); symptoms (three); relationships with family (three); relationships with the health care system (three); emotional and sexual life (two); coping (two); rejection (two).

Each item is scored from 1 (never/not at all) to 5 (always/very much). Before calculating the score of the dimensions, the scores of negatively written items are reversed. The score of a dimension is obtained by averaging the scores of its constituent items. The dimension scores are then transformed linearly into scores ranging from 0 to 100 (100 being the maximum quality of life level). A global quality of life score is also available.

48 weeks
Immunophenotyping
Time Frame: 48 weeks
Immunophenotyping in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and in blood assessing immunological and biomarkers modifications (at Week 0, Week 4, Week 12, Week 16, Week 24, Week 28, Week 48) immunophenotyping evaluation by : CSF and blood immune cells phenotyping CSF and blood cytokines and chemokines dosage MS biomarkers levels in blood and CSF (including Nfl and GFAP)
48 weeks
Detection of donor specific anti-HLA antibodies in the blood
Time Frame: 28 weeks
Alloimmunization in blood (at Week 0, Week 4, Week 12, Week 16, Week 24, Week 28): Detection of donor specific anti-HLA antibodies in the blood
28 weeks
MRI parameters : gadolinium (Gd) enhancing lesions
Time Frame: 48 weeks
Mean number of Gadolinium-enhancing lesions on spinal cord and cerebral MRI (Between W0 and W24-W48 and between W24- W48)
48 weeks
MRI parameters : new T2 lesions
Time Frame: 48 weeks
Mean number of new T2 lesions on spinal cord and cerebral MRI (Between W0 and W24-W48 and between W24- W48)
48 weeks
MRI parameters : change in brain volume
Time Frame: 48 weeks
Mean change in brain volume on cerebral MRI (Between W0 and W24-W48 and between W24- W48)
48 weeks
MRI parameters : change in spinal cord volume
Time Frame: 48 weeks
Mean change in spinal cord volume on spinal cord MRI (Between W0 and W24-W48 and between W24- W48)
48 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Laure MICHEL, Pr, CHU Rennes

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 6, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2029

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2029

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 6, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 10, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

September 19, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 5, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 31, 2025

Last Verified

December 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Multiple Sclerosis

Clinical Trials on Adipose tissue-derived Mesenchymal Stromal Cells

Subscribe