Single Plastic Stent Vs. Fully Covered Self-Expanding Metal Stent on Benign Biliary Stricture Secondary to Chronic Pancreatitis (ESSENCE)

May 14, 2025 updated by: Zhaoshen Li, Changhai Hospital

Efficacy and Safety of Single Plastic Stent Compared With Fully Covered Self-Expanding Metal Stent on Benign Biliary Stricture Secondary to Chronic Pancreatitis: A Single Center,Prospective,Non-inferiority, Open Label, Randomized, Controlled Trial

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the efficacy and safety of a single plastic stent versus a fully covered self-expanded metal stent in relieving benign biliary stricture secondary to chronic pancreatitis. The main questions it aims to answer is:

Whether the efficacy of a single plastic stent is non-inferior to that of a fully covered metal stent in patients with benign biliary stricture secondary to chronic pancreatitis?

Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either a single plastic stent (SPS) placement or fully covered self-expanded metal stent placement treatment for 6 months, and they will be followed up for 18 months.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Although a number of previous studies have shown that the drainage and dilation effect of a single plastic stent is limited for benign biliary stricture (BBS) secondary to chronic pancreatitis (CP), the poor management of CP itself in most studies may explain the unsatisfactory efficacy of a single biliary plastic stent in relieving CP secondary BBS. Investigators believe that the effective management of CP is an important step to solve the BBS secondary to CP, especially the effective removal of pancreatic duct stones, the relief of pancreatic duct obstruction and the maintenance of pancreatic duct patency. Previous data showed that in CP patients treated with ESWL combined with ERCP, 72.4% could achieve complete removal of main pancreatic duct stones and 90.8% could achieve successful endoscopic decompression. Under the premise of effectively removing the stones of the main pancreatic duct at the head of the pancreas and maintaining the patency of the pancreatic duct, using a single plastic stent for stent drainage of BBS is effective, and a single plastic stent has potential advantages such as lower stent displacement rate and cheaper. Therefore, investigators design a single-center, prospective, open-label, randomized controlled, non-inferiority trial to compare the effectiveness, safety, and cost-effectiveness of a single plastic stent and fcSEMS for the removal of CP secondary BBS under the premise that the primary disease, i.e. CP itself, was effectively managed.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

134

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Shanghai
      • Shanghai, Shanghai, China, 200433
        • Recruiting
        • Shanghai Changhai Hospital Clinical Research Ward
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age 18 or older;
  2. Patients diagnosed with CP;
  3. Symptomatic biliary stricture documented at time of enrollment for naïve stricture or at the time of prior plastic stent placement in strictures that had 1 prior plastic stent inserted: cholangitis, and/or an increase in total bilirubin or alkaline phosphatase levels(> 2 times the upper limit of normal) for more than 4 weeks;
  4. Confirmation of bile duct stricture by imaging assessment.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Prior plastic stenting exceeding six months or any metal stenting;
  2. Incomplete removal of stones from the main pancreatic duct located in the head of the pancreas during ERCP procedures;
  3. Biliary stricture of benign etiology other than chronic pancreatitis;
  4. Developing obstructive biliary symptoms associated with an attack of acute pancreatitis;
  5. Stricture within 2 cm of common bile duct bifurcation;
  6. Biliary stricture of malignant etiology;
  7. Patients with acute or chronic hepatitis, cirrhosis, primary sclerosing cholangitis, congenital biliary malformations or biliary fistula;
  8. Symptomatic duodenal stenosis (with gastric stasis);
  9. Subjects for whom endoscopic techniques are contraindicated;
  10. Pregnancy, incarceration;
  11. Life expectancy < 1 year;
  12. Other conditions that inappropriate to participant in the study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Fully covered self-expanding metal stent
A single biliary fcSEMS will be placed under ERCP. During stenting period , if symptoms of biliary obstruction occur due to stent occlusion or migration, ERCP replacement or implantation of a new stent should be performed according to the condition. After 6 months of stenting, imaging evaluation will be performed. ERCP is not needed if the stent undergoes spontaneous complete distal migration and the patient is asymptomatic and has normal liver function. If the stent is visible, ERCP will be performed to remove the stent and the stricture will be evaluated. If stricture persists after 6 months of stenting, a follow-up treatment plan should be developed through multidisciplinary discussion. One month after ERCP, complications will be followed up by telephone. Follow-up after biliary stent removal will be conducted to inquire about symptoms, signs and liver function test results, and to evaluate the recurrence of biliary stricture.
Participants will undergo ERCP. A flexible tube is inserted into the duodenum, crossing the sphincter of Oddi to access the biliary system. And the location, diameter, and length of biliary stricture will be evaluated by injection of contrast media. A fully covered self-expanding metal stent is then placed across the biliary stricture, allowing the bile duct to resume drainage. The participants will be observed closely after ERCP and record complications. Imaging evaluation will be conducted 6 months after stenting to confirm spontaneous passage of the biliary duct stent, and the stent will be removed via ERCP if it is still in place.
Experimental: single plastic stent
A single biliary plastic stent will be placed under ERCP. During stenting period , if symptoms of biliary obstruction occur due to stent occlusion or migration, ERCP replacement or implantation of a new stent should be performed according to the condition. After 6 months of stenting, imaging evaluation will be performed. ERCP is not needed if the stent undergoes spontaneous complete distal migration and the patient is asymptomatic and has normal liver function. If the stent is visible, ERCP will be performed to remove the stent and the stricture will be evaluated. If stricture persists after 6 months of stenting, a follow-up treatment plan should be developed through multidisciplinary discussion. One month after ERCP, complications will be followed up by telephone. Follow-up after biliary stent removal will be conducted to inquire about symptoms, signs and liver function test results, and to evaluate the recurrence of biliary stricture.
Participants will undergo ERCP. A flexible tube is inserted into the duodenum, crossing the sphincter of Oddi to access the biliary system. And the location, diameter, and length of biliary stricture will be evaluated by injection of contrast media. A single plastic stent is then placed across the biliary stricture, allowing the bile duct to resume drainage. The participants will be observed closely after ERCP and record complications. Imaging evaluation will be conducted 6 months after stenting to confirm spontaneous passage of the biliary duct stent, and the stent will be removed via ERCP if it is still in place.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Long-term stricture resolution
Time Frame: 2 years after enrollment
Stricture resolution assessed at the time of final stent removal as well as the absence of objective findings of stricture recurrence during the 18 months, post-stenting follow-up period.
2 years after enrollment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Early clinical success
Time Frame: 6 months after enrollment
Stricture resolution at the time all stent is removed. If there is a persistent stricture after 6 months of stent therapy in either group, the patient will be classified as a clinical failure.
6 months after enrollment
Technical success
Time Frame: 6 months after enrollment
The completion of the initial and each follow-up ERCP, including stent deployment and removal.
6 months after enrollment
Adverse events related to the device or procedure
Time Frame: 2 years after enrollment
Device or procedure related adverse events from the initial stent placement procedure to the 2 year follow-up.
2 years after enrollment
Length of stent placement and removal procedures
Time Frame: 6 months after enrollment
Length of stent placement procedures and stent removal procedures.
6 months after enrollment
Number of ERCP procedures after Initial stent placement.
Time Frame: 6 months after enrollment
The number of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) procedures after initial stent placement.
6 months after enrollment
Number of stents placed
Time Frame: 6 months after enrollment
The total number of stents placed
6 months after enrollment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Liang-Hao Hu, M.D., Changhai Hospital
  • Study Chair: Zhaoshen Li, M.D., Changhai Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 30, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2030

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2030

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 19, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 21, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

October 23, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 18, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 14, 2025

Last Verified

May 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe