- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06662513
Post Oesophagectomy Outcomes in a Single Regional Centre in Australia
An Australian Regional Hospital's Oesophagectomy Outcomes
Literature review/rationale for project
- Oesophageal cancer is associated with a grim prognosis despite many advances in treatment. Oesophagectomy is a key component of the care of patients who are candidates for curative treatment, however it is associated with substantial morbidity.
- Several studies have suggested that oesophagectomies performed at higher volume tertiary centres are associated with lower morbidity and mortality than lower volume centres, and this has prompted changes to policy in countries such as Great Britain, Canada and the Netherlands with regards to the centralisation of these cases. A higher volume centre within Australia is likely to perform 6 or more procedures per year.
- Currently within Australia, centralisation on a large scale has not occurred. This has been limited in part by resource provision and geographical barriers. Therefore, oesophagectomies in Australia are still routinely performed in regional centres. However, there is a paucity of recent outcomes data from these centres.
Aims/objectives
- Retrospective review of oesophagectomies undertaken in a single regional centre in Tasmania, Australia over 10 years (January 2014 to December 2023)
- Assess outcomes (long and short-term complications and mortality) and compare to morbidity and mortality rates from larger international centres
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Research aims/objectives
- Retrospective review of oesophagectomies undertaken in a single regional centre in Tasmania, Australia over 10 years (January 2014 to December 2023)
- Assess outcomes (long and short-term complications, mortality, survival) and compare to published outcomes from larger national and international centres
Project Design Research project setting: Launceston General Hospital (Tasmania, Australia)
Methodological approach: Retrospective case series
Participants
- Retrospective identification of patients who underwent oesophagectomy at Launceston General Hospital from January 2014 to December 2023 via coding in medical records and MBS codes
- Inclusion criteria: patients who underwent oeosphagectomy at LGH in the specified time frame
- Exclusion criteria: none
- Expected size of case series is approximately 100 patients (this is extrapolated from the number of oesophagectomies performed in 2023)
Participant recruitment strategies and timeframes: No active participation of patients in this case series, all information will be retrospectively collected from medical records
Consent: Given the number of expected patients (approximately 100) and the potential distress that could be caused to patients or their next of kin in seeking consent, an Application for the Waiver of the requirement for Consent will be submitted
Research Activities
- No participant commitment is required
- Project duration is approximately 4 weeks for data collection, 4 weeks for analysis and writing
- No Participant follow-up is planned as part of this project
Data Collection/Gathering
- Data will be collected by assessment medical records only
- Only the PI will access identifying details such as name and date of birth.
- Information that will be collected includes: Patient demographics: age, gender, neoadjuvant treatment, co-morbidities, BMI, ASA score, type of oesophagectomy (2 or 3 stage). Primary endpoints: mortality (in hospital, 30 day and 90 day), anastomotic leak, length of stay (ICU, acute inpatient). Secondary endpoints: chyle leak, pneumonia, reintubation, return to theatre, wound infection, intra-abdominal infection, cardiac complications, DVT/PE, anastomotic stricture, diaphragmatic hernia, disease recurrence, survival
Data Management
- Data will be entered into an excel spreadsheet kept on a password protected THS computer in the department of surgery in LGH
- Data will only be accessed by the named investigators that are based at LGH (no external researcher will have access to data)
- There will be no hard copies of this data
- Data will not be transferred to personal computers/laptops
- Data will be destroyed/deleted by the PI 5 years after publication date
Data Analysis
- Outcomes will be calculated as percentages and then compared to published outcomes data from other Australian centres and international centres Examples of some published studies that may be used to compare outcomes are listed in citations.
- Given the retrospective nature of the data collection it is anticipated that some information will be missing however the kind of data the investigators plan to collect is very likely to be found in the medical record.
- Any missing information will be acknowledged when assessing results and the impact of the missing information will also be acknowledged when making any conclusions from those results
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Renishka N Sellayah, MBBS (hons) FRACS
- Phone Number: +61 425 816 462
- Email: r.sellayah@gmail.com
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Girish Pande, FRACS
- Phone Number: +61 439 656 110
- Email: girish.pande@ths.tas.gov.au
Study Locations
-
-
Tasmania
-
Launceston, Tasmania, Australia, 7250
- Launceston General Hospital
-
Contact:
- Girish Pande, FRACS
- Phone Number: 61+ 439 656 110
- Email: girish.pande@ths.tas.gov.au
-
Contact:
- Kevin Yoong, MBBS
- Phone Number: 61+ 452 376 618
- Email: kevin.yoong@ths.tas.gov.au
-
Principal Investigator:
- Girish Pande, FRACS
-
Sub-Investigator:
- Renishka Sellayah, FRACS
-
Sub-Investigator:
- Kevin Yoong, MBBS
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Child
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- patients who underwent oeophagectomy at Launceston General Hospital between January 2014 to December 2023
Exclusion Criteria:
- none
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / Cohort |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
oesophagectomy
patients who underwent oesophagectomy within the specified time frame
|
No intervention - retrospective observational study
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
mortality
Time Frame: from date of surgery to end of study (November 2024) for a timeframe up to 10 years
|
date of death from any cause or date of palliation whichever came first
|
from date of surgery to end of study (November 2024) for a timeframe up to 10 years
|
|
Anastomotic leak
Time Frame: from date of surgery to end of study period (Nov 2024), assessed up to 10 years
|
Grade 1-3, diagnosed radiologicaly, requiring intervention (surgical or non-surgical)
|
from date of surgery to end of study period (Nov 2024), assessed up to 10 years
|
|
Length of stay
Time Frame: from date of surgery to discharge date of hospital admission, approximately 2-4 weeks in most cases but assessed up to 12 weeks
|
total inpatient hospital stay and total ICU length stay
|
from date of surgery to discharge date of hospital admission, approximately 2-4 weeks in most cases but assessed up to 12 weeks
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Collaborators
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Chang AC. Centralizing Esophagectomy to Improve Outcomes and Enhance Clinical Research: Invited Expert Review. Ann Thorac Surg. 2018 Sep;106(3):916-923. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2018.04.004. Epub 2018 May 5.
- Pu S, Chen H, Zhou C, Yu S, Liao X, Zhu L, He J, Wang B. Major Postoperative Complications in Esophageal Cancer After Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy Compared With Open Esophagectomy: An Updated Meta-analysis. J Surg Res. 2021 Jan;257:554-571. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2020.08.011. Epub 2020 Sep 11.
- De Silva I, Wee M, Cabalag CS, Fong R, Tran K, Wu M, Schloithe A, Bright T, Duong CP, Watson DI. Para-conduit diaphragmatic hernia following esophagectomy-the new price of minimally invasive surgery? Dis Esophagus. 2023 Apr 29;36(5):doad011. doi: 10.1093/dote/doad011.
- Buchholz V, Hazard R, Lee DK, Liu DS, Zhang W, Chen S, Aly A, Barnett S, Le P, Weinberg L. Textbook outcomes after oesophagectomy: a single-centre observational study. BMC Surg. 2023 Dec 8;23(1):368. doi: 10.1186/s12893-023-02253-7.
- Edmondson J, Hunter J, Bakis G, O'Connor A, Wood S, Qureshi AP. Understanding Post-Esophagectomy Complications and Their Management: The Early Complications. J Clin Med. 2023 Dec 11;12(24):7622. doi: 10.3390/jcm12247622.
- Oesophago-Gastric Anastomosis Study Group on behalf of the West Midlands Research Collaborative. Comparison of short-term outcomes from the International Oesophago-Gastric Anastomosis Audit (OGAA), the Esophagectomy Complications Consensus Group (ECCG), and the Dutch Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer Audit (DUCA). BJS Open. 2021 May 7;5(3):zrab010. doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrab010. Erratum In: BJS Open. 2022 Jan 6;6(1):zrac027. doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrac027.
- Anderson O, Ni Z, Moller H, Coupland VH, Davies EA, Allum WH, Hanna GB. Hospital volume and survival in oesophagectomy and gastrectomy for cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2011 Nov;47(16):2408-14. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2011.07.001. Epub 2011 Aug 9.
- Doran SLF, Digby MG, Green SV, Kelty CJ, Tamhankar AP. Risk factors for and treatment of anastomotic strictures after Ivor Lewis esophagectomy. Surg Endosc. 2024 Aug 19. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11150-w. Online ahead of print.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Estimated)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimated)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2024/ETH01712
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.