A Retrospective Study to Validate BioEP as an Assessment Aid for Seizure Susceptibility (SOLITAIRE)

October 30, 2024 updated by: Neuronostics Ltd

Retrospective Analysis of Routine EEG to Validate a Computational Biomarker (BioEP) as an Assessment Aid for Seizure Susceptibility.

The goal of this retrospective study is to validate BioEP during routine adult EEG recording in an outpatient setting, using patients with a known epilepsy diagnosis. The main objectives of the study are:

  • To validate BioEP during routine adult EEG recording in an outpatient setting, using patients with a known diagnosis
  • To examine whether the use of BioEP could support a more efficient patient pathway to diagnosis (thus adding economic value), by reducing time to final diagnosis and/or the number of clinical appointments needed.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

400

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Adult population with a diagnosis of epilepsy

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adults (age 22 and above) who had a routine EEG in an outpatient setting, following a suspected seizure.
  • A diagnosis of epilepsy or alternate condition has been reached. A period of at least 3 years has passed since ultimate diagnosis, which itself has remained stable.
  • EEGs performed to ABRET & IFCN standards using a minimum of 19 electrodes and additional technical requirements.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subject was not suspected of having had a seizure or epilepsy.
  • Subject has a dual diagnosis of epilepsy AND non-epileptic seizures.
  • Subject's final diagnosis unknown, unstable, or less than three years passed since an unchanged diagnosis was made.
  • Incomplete or unreliable metadata, such as the age, sex, and treatment status at the time of the EEG recording.
  • Sleep deprived EEG recordings in the outpatient setting.
  • Encephalopathic subjects.
  • Poor quality EEGs (multiple artefacts) that do not fulfil technical criteria for analysis.
  • Known structural abnormalities or skull breaches, including historical cases, or with people with metal or plastic implants in their brain or skull.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Epilepsy

Device: BioEP

All patient's EEG will have the BioEP score conducted on it

Non-epilepsy

Device: BioEP

All patient's EEG will have the BioEP score conducted on it

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
To validate BioEP during routine adult EEG recording in an outpatient setting, using patients with a known diagnosis
Time Frame: 6 months
Diagnostic accuracy, defined by a primary endpoint family1 of two ranked endpoints. Specifically, we are testing whether BioEP has superior sensitivity to initial EEG alone and is no worse than EEG alone for specificity (non-inferiority). These are ranked hypotheses with sensitivity taking precedence (fixed sequence method) . That is, we shall only proceed to comparing specificity if sensitivity is superior.
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
To examine whether the use of BioEP could support a more efficient patient pathway to diagnosis
Time Frame: 6 months
To assess if BioEP can positively influence the patient pathway by reducing number of clinical appointments to diagnosis
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Milaana Mainstone, Neuronostics Ltd

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

January 1, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

March 1, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

March 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 7, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 30, 2024

First Posted (Estimated)

November 1, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

November 1, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 30, 2024

Last Verified

October 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • NNBioEP003

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe