Relief From Stress Via Social Protection in Senegal (RESTORE)

April 29, 2025 updated by: Georgetown University

Relief From Stress Via Social Protection in Senegal (RESTORE): Study Protocol for a Pilot Feasibility Cluster-randomized Control Trial of Self-Help Plus (SH+) in Senegal.

Despite the growing prevalence of mental health disorders in low- and middle-income countries, significant barriers to seeking and accessing mental health services persist. Within lower income populations, the prevalence of mental health disorders and barriers to addressing them are worsened by poverty. Self-Help Plus is a group-based stress management program delivered using a task-sharing model and designed to circumvent barriers to addressing mental health concerns. Cultural adaptations of Self-Help Plus have been implemented in several countries and are considered cost-effective. However, to date, Self-Help Plus has not been adapted for Senegalese populations. The study detailed in this manuscript aims to assess the feasibility and acceptability of Self-Help Plus in lower income populations in Senegal.

The study is a pilot feasibility cluster-randomized control trial of Self-Help Plus in four Senegalese communities. Clusters of social protection program beneficiaries will be randomly selected to receive five sessions of Self-Help Plus. The intervention will be delivered in groups of up to 30 beneficiaries and co-facilitated by two community workers. A combination of quantitative and qualitative research methods will be used to assess the feasibility and acceptability of both the Self-Help Plus intervention and randomized control trial procedures. The study sample will include social protection program beneficiaries in the treatment and control groups, Self-Help Plus facilitators, project staff supporting the training of facilitators, and the intervention supervisor.

The findings of this study will be used to inform the potential integration of Self-Help Plus and/or similar mental health interventions into the national social protection program in Senegal.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The primary objective of the pilot feasibility cluster-randomized controlled trial is to assess the feasibility and acceptability of both the Self-Help Plus intervention and trial procedures through the collection of quantitative and qualitative data. The study will include two trial arms: (1) a control treatment-as-usual arm and (2) an intervention arm that will receive the adapted Self Help Plus intervention. The findings of the research detailed in this protocol may be used to inform the design of a potential larger randomized control trial powered to assess the effectiveness of Self-Help Plus in Senegalese populations. Additional secondary objectives of the pilot feasibility study are listed below.

  1. Assess feasibility of cluster randomization procedure to limit biases and risk of contamination;
  2. Determine recruitment and retention rates for Self-Help Plus sessions;
  3. Evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of intervention delivery by Self-Help Plus trained non-specialists;
  4. Assess the safety of an abbreviated training curriculum (during training, intervention delivery, and supervision);
  5. Assess feasibility and acceptability of outcome measures;
  6. Assess ethics and safety of trial procedures using the adverse event protocol;

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

748

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Dakar, Senegal
        • Centre de Recherche Pour le Développement Economique et Social (CRDES)

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Community Worker facilitators of the intervention:
  • Patients: Enrolled in the World Bank Social Protection Programme

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Community Worker facilitators of the intervention
  • Patients: Persons with a severe mental disorder or suicidality

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Treatment as usual
Treatment as usual from Health System in Senegal
Referral to Health System of Senegal
Experimental: Relief from Stress via Social Protection in Senegal
Training community workers in Self Help Plus intervention
Training community workers in Self Help Plus intervention, a 5 session self-help intervention based on Acceptance and Commitment Therapy

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Engagement
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 5 weeks
Of those who were offered the intervention, at least 25% attended one or more sessions.
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 5 weeks
Retention
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 5 weeks
At least 50% of the ever-attended beneficiaries attended at least any 4 intervention sessions
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 5 weeks
Fidelity
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 5 weeks
Fidelity to intervention elements at the level of 75% or greater according to the mean fidelity checklist for intervention elements across all sessions. Number of feasibility domains: n=15; higher is better, scored on 0-100%
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 5 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
General Health Questionnaire-12
Time Frame: Prior to initiation of treatment
Brief psychological well-being scale. Score range: 0-36; Higher score indicates worse psychological well-being
Prior to initiation of treatment
Patient Health Questionnaire-9
Time Frame: Prior to initiation of treatment
Brief depression screening instrument. Score range: 0-27; Higher score indicates worse depressive symptoms
Prior to initiation of treatment
Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7
Time Frame: Prior to initiation of treatment
Brief anxiety screening instrument. Score range: 0-21; Higher score indicates worse anxiety symptoms
Prior to initiation of treatment
Brief Resilience Scale
Time Frame: Prior to initiation of treatment
Brief resilience measure. Score range: 0-30; Higher score indicates better resilience
Prior to initiation of treatment
Acceptance and Action Questionnaire
Time Frame: Prior to initiation of treatment
Brief scale of psychological flexibility. Score range: 0-35; Higher score indicates worse psychological flexibility
Prior to initiation of treatment
Self Efficacy
Time Frame: Prior to initiation of treatment
Brief scale of self efficacy. Score range: 0-24; Higher score indicates better self efficacy
Prior to initiation of treatment
Locus of control questionnaire
Time Frame: Prior to initiation of treatment
Brief scale measuring locus of control. Score range: 0-20; Higher score indicates better locus of control
Prior to initiation of treatment
General Health Questionnaire-12
Time Frame: 2 months following initiation of treatment
Brief psychological well-being scale. Score range: 0-36; Higher score indicates worse psychological well-being
2 months following initiation of treatment
General Health Questionnaire-12
Time Frame: 5 months following initiation of treatment
Brief psychological well-being scale. Score range: 0-36; Higher score indicates worse psychological well-being
5 months following initiation of treatment
Patient Health Questionnaire-9
Time Frame: 2 months following initiation of treatment
Brief depression screening instrument. Score range: 0-27; Higher score indicates worse depressive symptoms
2 months following initiation of treatment
Patient Health Questionnaire-9
Time Frame: 5 months following initiation of treatment
Brief depression screening instrument. Score range: 0-27; Higher score indicates worse depressive symptoms
5 months following initiation of treatment
Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7
Time Frame: 2 months following initiation of treatment
Brief anxiety screening instrument. Score range: 0-21; Higher score indicates worse anxiety symptoms
2 months following initiation of treatment
Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7
Time Frame: 5 months following initiation of treatment
Brief anxiety screening instrument. Score range: 0-21; Higher score indicates worse anxiety symptoms
5 months following initiation of treatment
Brief Resilience Scale
Time Frame: 2 months following initiation of treatment
Brief resilience measure. Score range: 0-30; Higher score indicates better resilience
2 months following initiation of treatment
Brief Resilience Scale
Time Frame: 5 months following initiation of treatment
Brief resilience measure. Score range: 0-30; Higher score indicates better resilience
5 months following initiation of treatment
Acceptance and Action Questionnaire
Time Frame: 2 months following initiation of treatment
Brief scale of psychological flexibility. Score range: 0-35; Higher score indicates worse psychological flexibility
2 months following initiation of treatment
Acceptance and Action Questionnaire
Time Frame: 5 months following initiation of treatment
Brief scale of psychological flexibility. Score range: 0-35; Higher score indicates worse psychological flexibility
5 months following initiation of treatment
Self Efficacy
Time Frame: 2 months following initiation of treatment
Brief scale of self efficacy. Score range: 0-24; Higher score indicates better self efficacy
2 months following initiation of treatment
Self Efficacy
Time Frame: 5 months following initiation of treatment
Brief scale of self efficacy. Score range: 0-24; Higher score indicates better self efficacy
5 months following initiation of treatment
Locus of control questionnaire
Time Frame: 2 months following initiation of treatment
Brief scale measuring locus of control. Score range: 0-20; Higher score indicates better locus of control
2 months following initiation of treatment
Locus of control questionnaire
Time Frame: 5 months following initiation of treatment
Brief scale measuring locus of control. Score range: 0-20; Higher score indicates better locus of control
5 months following initiation of treatment

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Culture-specific measure of distress - Thinking too much
Time Frame: Prior to initiation of treatment
Exploratory 1-item culture-specific measure of distress; Score range: 0-5; Higher score indicates worse psychological well-being
Prior to initiation of treatment
Culture-specific measure of distress - Thinking too much
Time Frame: 2 months following initiation of treatment
Exploratory 1-item culture-specific measure of distress; Score range: 0-5; Higher score indicates worse psychological well-being
2 months following initiation of treatment
Culture-specific measure of distress - Thinking too much
Time Frame: 5 months following initiation of treatment
Exploratory 1-item culture-specific measure of distress; Score range: 0-5; Higher score indicates worse psychological well-being
5 months following initiation of treatment
Culture-specific measure of distress - Feelings that hurt the heart
Time Frame: Prior to initiation of treatment
Exploratory 1-item culture-specific measure of distress; Score range: 0-5; Higher score indicates worse psychological well-being
Prior to initiation of treatment
Culture-specific measure of distress - Feelings that hurt the heart
Time Frame: 2 months following initiation of treatment
Exploratory 1-item culture-specific measure of distress; Score range: 0-5; Higher score indicates worse psychological well-being
2 months following initiation of treatment
Culture-specific measure of distress - Feelings that hurt the heart
Time Frame: 5 months following initiation of treatment
Exploratory 1-item culture-specific measure of distress; Score range: 0-5; Higher score indicates worse psychological well-being
5 months following initiation of treatment
Culture-specific measure of well being - Heart has felt calm
Time Frame: Prior to initiation of treatment
Exploratory 1-item culture-specific measure of well being; Score range: 0-3; Higher score indicates better well being
Prior to initiation of treatment
Culture-specific measure of well being - Heart has felt calm
Time Frame: 2 months following initiation of treatment
Exploratory 1-item culture-specific measure of well being; Score range: 0-3; Higher score indicates better well being
2 months following initiation of treatment
Culture-specific measure of well being - Heart has felt calm
Time Frame: 5 months following initiation of treatment
Exploratory 1-item culture-specific measure of well being; Score range: 0-3; Higher score indicates better well being
5 months following initiation of treatment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Syed S Wahid, Doctor of Public Health, Georgetown University
  • Principal Investigator: Anne Hilger, PhD, World Bank

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 24, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

October 1, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

October 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 22, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 19, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

November 21, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 2, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 29, 2025

Last Verified

March 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • IRB#2575

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe