Transcatheter Tricuspid Valve Replacement Using the Lux-Valve Plus System (LuxValve)

November 28, 2024 updated by: Dr So Chak Yu kent, Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, Hong Kong

Transcatheter Tricuspid Valve Replacement Using the Lux-Valve Plus System for Patients With No Other Interventional Option: A Compassionate Use Study

Tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is a common disease, and the tricuspid valve (TV) is no longer a "forgotten valve". Open heart surgery for isolated TR is uncommonly performed due to high operative risk (8-10% mortality). However, TR is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. There exists an unmet clinical need for less invasive intervention to treat TR. Transcatheter edge to edge repair (TEER) is a technique that is shown to be safe and effective in TR reduction and is associated with significant symptom improvement. However, a significant portion of TV anatomy are not suitable to be treated with TEER (e.g. coaptation gap >10mm). A wide variety of technologies has been developed in recent years. Transcatheter tricuspid valve replacement (TTVR) is one of the more promising option for tricuspid regurgitation (TR) patients at high risk for surgery. A previous study reported that transcatheter tricuspid devices, which were employed with the radial force between the device and tricuspid annulus, were radial force-dependent. However, this radial force for valve fixation may cause complications, such as conduction block and right coronary artery impingement. The LuX-Valve (Jenscare Biotechnology) is a radial force-independent orthotopic TTVR device. The feasibility and efficacy of this device have been reported by several studies. However, this valve was implanted through right atrial access, where a small incision of the right chest and right atrium is needed. The LuX-Valve Plus valve replacement system is the second-generation version of the LuX-Valve and can be implanted through the jugular vein. The first-in-human implantation was recently performed. The study aims to assess the feasibility, safety and efficacy outcome of the Lux Valve Plus system in a cohort of otherwise no surgical option patients with severe symptomatic tricuspid regurgitation despite optimal medical therapy.

Study Overview

Status

Enrolling by invitation

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

20

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Shatin
      • Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong, 0000
        • Prince of Wales Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients aged 50- to 90-year-old
  • Severe symptomatic tricuspid regurgitation (NYHA III-IV) despite optimal medical therapy
  • Deem high risk for tricuspid valve surgery determined by a multidisciplinary heart team (including cardiologists, cardiac surgeons and cardiac anesthetists)
  • Anatomically not feasible with other transcatheter tricuspid valve therapy that is commercially available in Hong Kong (i.e. TriClip System)
  • Capacity to provide informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Systolic pulmonary artery pressure (sPAP) > 60 mmHg assessed by echocardiography
  • Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) <40%
  • Evidence of intracardiac mass, thrombus or vegetation
  • Anatomical structures precluding proper device deployment or device vascular access, evaluated by echo or CT
  • Surgical correction is indicated for other concomitant valvular disease (e.g., severe aortic, mitral and/or pulmonic valve stenosis and/or regurgitation); Subjects with concomitant valvular disease may treat their respective valve first and wait 2 months before being reassessed for the trial.
  • Sepsis or active endocarditis within 3 months, or infections requiring antibiotic therapy within 2 weeks prior to the planned procedure
  • Active peptic ulcer or active gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding precluding anticoagulation or antiplatelet therapy
  • Subjects currently participating in another clinical trial of an investigational drug or device that has not yet completed its primary endpoint.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Intervention
The LuX-Valve (Jenscare Biotechnology) is a radial force-independent orthotopic TTVR device. The feasibility and efficacy of this device have been reported by several studies (11-13). However, this valve was implanted through right atrial access, where a small incision of the right chest and right atrium is needed. The LuX-Valve Plus valve replacement system is the second-generation version of the LuX-Valve and can be implanted through the jugular vein.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
A composite endpoint of Major Adverse Event (MAE)
Time Frame: 1 year post-op
A composite endpoint of Major Adverse Event (MAE) at 30 days post procedure: Cardiovascular Mortality, Myocardial Infarction (MI), Stroke, New onset renal failure requiring unplanned dialysis or renal replacement therapy, Severe Bleeding (includes fatal, life-threatening and extensive bleeding as defined by VARC), Non-selective tricuspid valve surgery or transcatheter re-intervention post procedure, Major cardiac structural complications, Major access site and vascular complications, New pacemaker implantation due to AV block
1 year post-op

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Acute Device Success Rate
Time Frame: At the end of Procedure
successful deployment of the device and removal of the delivery system as planned, with no unplanned surgery related to the device or access procedure.
At the end of Procedure
Procedural Success Rate
Time Frame: At the end of Procedure
Device success without clinically significant PVL, as determined by the Echo Core Lab (ECL) assessment of a discharge TTE. Subjects who die or undergo tricuspid valve surgery before discharge are procedure failures.
At the end of Procedure
All-cause mortality
Time Frame: 30-day and 1-year post-op
30-day and 1-year all-cause mortality
30-day and 1-year post-op
Heart failure hospitalization
Time Frame: 30-day and 1-year post-op
30-day and 1-year Heart failure hospitalization
30-day and 1-year post-op
NYHA Functional Class
Time Frame: 30-day and 1-year post-op
NYHA Functional Class 2. Distance of 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT) 3. Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ):Scores are transformed to a range of 0-100, in which higher scores reflect better health status
30-day and 1-year post-op
Distance of 6-Minute Walk Test
Time Frame: 30-day and 1-year post-op
Distance of 6-Minute Walk Test in meters
30-day and 1-year post-op
Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire
Time Frame: 30-day and 1-year post-op
Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ):Scores are transformed to a range of 0-100, in which higher scores reflect better health status
30-day and 1-year post-op
TR Severity
Time Frame: Baseline, day 1, day 30, 6-month, 1-year
TR Severity assessed by echocardiography
Baseline, day 1, day 30, 6-month, 1-year
Mean Tricuspid valve inflow gradient
Time Frame: Baseline, day 1, day 30, 6-month, 1-year
Mean Tricuspid valve inflow gradient assessed by echocardiography
Baseline, day 1, day 30, 6-month, 1-year
Right Atrial Volume
Time Frame: Baseline, day 1, day 30, 6-month, 1-year
Right Atrial Volume assessed by echocardiography
Baseline, day 1, day 30, 6-month, 1-year
TAPSE
Time Frame: Baseline, day 1, day 30, 6-month, 1-year
TAPSE assessed by echocardiography
Baseline, day 1, day 30, 6-month, 1-year
Right ventricular functions assessments
Time Frame: Baseline, day 1, day 30, 6-month, 1-year
Right ventricular functions assessments assessed by echocardiography
Baseline, day 1, day 30, 6-month, 1-year
Right ventricular functions assessments: fractional area change(FAC)
Time Frame: Baseline, day 1, day 30, 6-month, 1-year
Right ventricular functions assessments: fractional area change(FAC)assessed by echocardiography
Baseline, day 1, day 30, 6-month, 1-year
Right ventricular functions assessments: systolic tricuspid lateral annular tissue velocity S'
Time Frame: Baseline, day 1, day 30, 6-month, 1-year
Right ventricular functions assessments: systolic tricuspid lateral annular tissue velocity S' assessed by echocardiography
Baseline, day 1, day 30, 6-month, 1-year
Right ventricular functions assessments: Hepatic vein flow reversal
Time Frame: Baseline, day 1, day 30, 6-month, 1-year
Right ventricular functions assessments: Hepatic vein flow reversal assessed by echocardiography
Baseline, day 1, day 30, 6-month, 1-year
Systolic pulmonary artery pressure
Time Frame: Baseline, day 1, day 30, 6-month, 1-year
Systolic pulmonary artery pressure assessed by echocardiography
Baseline, day 1, day 30, 6-month, 1-year
Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF)
Time Frame: Baseline, day 1, day 30, 6-month, 1-year
Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) assessed by echocardiography
Baseline, day 1, day 30, 6-month, 1-year
Paravalvular leak severity
Time Frame: Baseline, day 1, day 30, 6-month, 1-year
Paravalvular leak severity assessed by echocardiography
Baseline, day 1, day 30, 6-month, 1-year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Kent So, PI, Chinese University of Hong Kong

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 18, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 30, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 26, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 28, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

December 3, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 3, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 28, 2024

Last Verified

November 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2023.029

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

IPD will not be shared

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Tricuspid Regurgitation

Subscribe