Transrectal Evaluation After Discoid Resection for Endometriosis Intestinal

Transrectal Evaluation After Discoid Resection For Endometriosis Intestinal

Evaluating the success of rectosigmoidoscopy performed after intestinal resection in women with deep endometriosis during surgery

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Endometriosis is an inflammatory, benign, oestrogen-dependent condition that affects 10-15% of women of reproductive age. It is characterised by the presence of endometrial tissue, glands and stroma, outside the uterine cavity. Endometriosis may present in the pelvis as superficial peritoneal, ovarian or deep infiltrating. The reported prevalence of bowel or recto-vaginal space involvement among women with endometriosis ranges from 5% to 25% (2). Surgery is the treatment of choice for deep endometriosis with bowel involvement when drug therapy alone is ineffective in treating symptoms. Surgical techniques for intestinal endometriosis can be divided into full-thickness techniques (discoid or segmental resection) and non-full-thickness techniques (shaving).

Focusing on women who underwent a discoid resection, 3.7% of 80 reported a recto-vaginal fistula and the same percentage showed early rectorrhagia requiring endoscopic treatment after surgery. In general surgery rectosigmoidoscopy has shown encouraging results as a feasible, safe and effective technique in reducing the risk of complications related to intestinal anastomosis. There are no studies in the literature evaluating the role of rectosigmoidoscopy as a routine practice in gynaecological surgery for endometriosis, so we rely on the experience of general surgeons. In particular, the lack of data does not allow us to evaluate the feasibility of rectosigmoidoscopy during deep endometriosis surgery in terms of the success of the procedure itself and the additional operative time taken. The latter aspect is also important from the point of view of health policy due to the increased cost of the operating theatre directly related to the time taken for the procedure.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

19

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Bologna, Italy, 40138
        • IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients diagnosed with deep endometriosis with suspected bowel involvement who will undergo segmental or discoid resection for the period of one year following the date of study approval

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Women between the ages of 18 and 50 years
  • Women with diagnosis made by instrumental examination such as transvaginal ultrasound, of deep endometriosis with suspected bowel involvement
  • Women undergoing segmental or discoid resection for bowel endometriosis
  • Obtaining informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who are candidates for elective laparotomic surgery
  • Patients with concomitant inflammatory bowel disease known in history (inflammatory bowel syndrome)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Success rate of rectosigmoidoscopic procedure in patients with deep endometriosis with bowel involvement undergoing segmental or discoid resection surgery
Time Frame: 3 months after surgery
Ratio of the number of successfully completed interventions to the total number of interventions performed using rectosigmoidoscopy. The success of the intervention is determined following qualitative evaluation of the anastomosis
3 months after surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Incidence of intraoperative complications: rectorrhagia, leakage, mucosal crash, intussusception, anastomosis stenosis, intraperitoneal hemorrhage, conversion to laparotomy surgery
Time Frame: During surgery
Ratio of the number of procedures in which any of the intraoperative complications described above occurred to the total number of procedures using rectosigmoidoscopy
During surgery
Incidence of postoperative complications within the first three months post-segmental or discoid resection surgery among patients undergoing rectosigmoidoscopy and patients undergoing the same surgery without rectosigmoidoscopy
Time Frame: 3 months after surgery
Ratio of the number of surgeries in which any of the above postoperative complications occurred to the total number of surgeries using rectosigmoidoscopy
3 months after surgery
Operating time duration in patients undergoing discoid or segmental resection with or without the use of intraoperative rectosigmoidoscopy
Time Frame: 3 months after surgery
Percentage difference between average surgical durations in patients undergoing resection surgery with and without a rectosigmoidoscopy procedure. Lacking baseline data, an increase, compared with patients who did not undergo rectosigmoidoscopy, of up to 20% in average surgical time is considered reasonable
3 months after surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Paolo Casadio, MD, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 21, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

March 29, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 1, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 30, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 30, 2024

Last Verified

December 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe