Anterior Glenoid Nerve Block Versus Pericapsular Nerve Group Block Versus Interscalene Brachial Plexus Block for Postoperative Pain Management in Shoulder Arthroscopic Surgeries

January 13, 2025 updated by: Mohamed Serry, Ain Shams University

Anterior Glenoid Nerve Block Versus Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) Block Versus Interscalene Brachial Plexus (ISB) Block for Postoperative Pain Management in Shoulder Arthroscopic Surgeries

This study aims to compare between Anterior glenoid nerve block, pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block and Interscalene brachial plexus (ISB) block for post-operative pain management in shoulder arthroscopic surgeries

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Major surgeries of the shoulder constitute some of the most commonly performed orthopedic procedures. They often result in moderate to severe postoperative pain thereby requiring a multimodal analgesic approach centered around peripheral nerve blocks.

Postoperative pain management is the part of shoulder surgery to improve patient satisfaction, start rehabilitation process rapidly and decrease for hospital stay.

Interscalene blocks (ISB) are well-studied and established means of providing analgesia following shoulder surgery and are considered the gold standard mode of regional anesthesia and post-operative pain management in shoulder surgeries.

A novel technique: pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block can be effectively and safely applied under ultrasound guidance in shoulder surgery cases for postoperative analgesia. In addition, PENG block targets articular branches with less motor effect compared with interscalene brachial plexus block providing anesthetic and analgesic effect with less complication and better and sooner ambulation.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

49

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Cairo, Egypt, 11591
        • Recruiting
        • Ain Shams University
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Amr E Abd El-Hamid, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Ihab H Attia, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Amr H Ali, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Ossama M Farrag, MD
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age from 18 to 70 years.
  • No sex predilection.
  • American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) physical status I-II.
  • Undergoing shoulder arthroscopic surgeries.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient's refusal.
  • Patients with a history of drug allergies to study drugs.
  • Evidence of local infection at the site of injection.
  • Inability to cooperate
  • Neuromuscular pathology (example: - Multiple Sclerosis)
  • Previous trauma or surgery to the shoulder

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Interscalene brachial plexus block group
Patients will receive an Interscalene brachial plexus block.
Patients will receive an Interscalene brachial plexus block.
Experimental: Anterior glenoid nerve block group
Patients will receive an anterior glenoid nerve block.
Patients will receive an anterior glenoid nerve block.
Experimental: Pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block group
Patients will receive a pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block.
Patients will receive a pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time to the 1st rescue analgesia
Time Frame: 24 hours postoperatively
Time to the first request for the rescue analgesia (time from the end of surgery to the first dose of pethidine administrated).
24 hours postoperatively

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Total pethidine consumption
Time Frame: 24 hours postoperatively
All patients will receive intravenous pethidine (30mg) on demand [Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score ≥3].
24 hours postoperatively
Degree of pain
Time Frame: 24 hours postoperatively
Degree of pain will be assessed using visual analogue scale (VAS). Each patient will be instructed about postoperative pain assessment with the VAS. VAS (0 represents "no pain" while 10 represents "the worst pain imaginable"). VAS will be assessed at 0, 6, 12, and 24 hours postoperatively.
24 hours postoperatively
Length of hospital stay
Time Frame: Till discharge from hospital (Up to one week).
Length of hospital stay will be recorded from admission till the discharge from hospital.
Till discharge from hospital (Up to one week).
Time needed for the patient to freely move the operated limb
Time Frame: Postoperatively (Up to one week).
Time needed for the patient to freely move the operated limb will be recorded.
Postoperatively (Up to one week).
Degree of patients satisfaction
Time Frame: 24 hours postoperatively
Degree of patient satisfaction will be assessed on a 5-point Likert scale patient satisfaction (1, extremely dissatisfied; 2, unsatisfied; 3, neutral; 4, satisfied; 5, extremely satisfied)
24 hours postoperatively

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 13, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 31, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 8, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 13, 2025

Last Verified

January 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • FMASU MD195/2024

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

The data will be available upon a reasonable request from the corresponding author after the end of study for one year.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

After the end of study for one year.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

The data will be available upon a reasonable request from the corresponding author.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Postoperative Pain

Clinical Trials on Interscalene brachial plexus block

Subscribe