Emotional Recovery Post-Stroke (eWELL)

June 16, 2026 updated by: Michelle Woodbury, Medical University of South Carolina

Centering Emotional Recovery Post-Stroke

The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether adding an emotional wellness component to occupational therapy (OT) and/or speech therapy (ST) telerehabilitation improves overall emotional well-being and activity participation for people with stroke.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether adding an emotional wellness component to occupational therapy (OT) and/or speech therapy (ST) telerehabilitation improves overall emotional well-being and activity participation for people with stroke. Participants will complete 9 telerehabilitation therapy sessions over 8 weeks. These sessions will take place over a video visit using a personal device (phone, tablet, or computer). Each session will last about 1 hour. Sessions will focus on occupational therapy and/or speech therapy depending on the participant's stroke-related movement and/or language deficits. Each study participant will be randomly assigned to one of two intervention groups. Both groups will include OT or ST; however, one group will include an emotional wellness component using a modified version of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy. Participants will also complete 2 assessment visits, one before the telerehabilitation begins and one after the telerehabilitation program ends. The assessment visits will also take place via a video visit using a personal device. Assessments include measures of emotional well-being, quality of life, activity engagement, arm/hand movement, communication/language skills, balance, and ability to perform daily activities.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

80

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • South Carolina
      • Charleston, South Carolina, United States, 29425
        • Recruiting
        • Medical University of South Carolina
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Self-reported stroke-related deficits in emotional wellness such as anxiety, sleep disturbance, dread, fear, loss of hope, sadness.
  • Have experienced ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke at least 30 days prior
  • Stroke-related aphasia and/or upper extremity hemiparesis
  • Aged 21 years or older
  • English as primary language
  • Have corrected vision to be able to read text on a screen
  • Able to participate fully in the study's tele-rehabilitation (Aim 1) and/or virtual group programing (Aim 2) with personally owned device (i.e., phone, tablet, or laptop) and personal Wi-Fi connection or cellular service
  • Cognitive, language, and motor capacity to participate fully in the study's assessment session as per the judgment of the licensed, experienced stroke tele-rehabilitation occupational or speech therapist

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unable to follow 1-2 step instructions given by the study team member during the informed consent procedures.
  • Pain that interferes with ability to participate in the study's upper extremity movement tasks.
  • Have impaired decision making capacity as determined by the U-ARE protocol for assessing capacity to provide informed consent.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: modified Cognitive Behavioral Therapy + Telerehabilitation Occupational or Speech Therapy

If the participant demonstrates aphasia of any severity level on the Revised Western Aphasia Battery (WAB-R) assessment given at the PRE session, the subject will receive ST, provided by a Speech Language Pathologists (SLP), stroke telerehabilitation. If there is no aphasia, the subject will receive OT stroke telerehabilitation.

The OT and ST stroke telerehabilitation sessions will utilize a similar metacognitive strategy training approach which is focused on enabling the stroke survivor to re-engage with meaningful life activities. In the Occupational Therapy literature this approach is called Cognitive Orientation to Occupational Performance (CO-OP) and in the Speech Language Pathology Literature this approach is called the Life Participation Approach to Aphasia (LPAA).

Telerehabilitation CO-OP and LPAA within the OT or ST session include three common elements: Shared decision-making for goal setting, guidance/coaching from the therapist, and self-evaluation.

The theoretical model underling Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) explains the interaction of thoughts, feelings, and behaviors during life situations. This model suggests that a person's thoughts/feeling/behaviors affect their functioning during life situations. This contrasts with a common belief that one's functioning during life situations is the only way to effect thoughts/feelings/behaviors. Applied to stroke, this model suggests that the stroke survivor can alter his/her functioning during life situations by altering his/her thoughts/feelings/behaviors. The purpose of CBT is to empower the person with the skills to alter his/her thoughts/feelings/behaviors in order to positively affect function in life situations.

The mCBT intervention includes 4 elements: psychoeducation, education about unhelpful thinking, behavioral activation therapy, education on sleep hygiene, and relaxation training.

Active Comparator: Telerehabilitation Occupational or Speech Therapy

If the participant demonstrates aphasia of any severity level on the Revised Western Aphasia Battery (WAB-R) assessment given at the PRE session, the subject will receive ST, provided by a Speech Language Pathologists (SLP), stroke telerehabilitation. If there is no aphasia, the subject will receive OT stroke telerehabilitation.

The OT and ST stroke telerehabilitation sessions will utilize a similar metacognitive strategy training approach which is focused on enabling the stroke survivor to re-engage with meaningful life activities. In the Occupational Therapy literature this approach is called Cognitive Orientation to Occupational Performance (CO-OP) and in the Speech Language Pathology Literature this approach is called the Life Participation Approach to Aphasia (LPAA).

Telerehabilitation CO-OP and LPAA within the OT or ST session include three common elements: Shared decision-making for goal setting, guidance/coaching from the therapist, and self-evaluation.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Scale (WEMWS)
Time Frame: Baseline, pre-intervention and immediately after the intervention, Week 8.
14-item scale of mental well-being rated by participants on a 5-point scale (1=low, 5=high). Summed item ratings are reported out of 70 points so that higher scores indicate greater mental wellbeing.
Baseline, pre-intervention and immediately after the intervention, Week 8.
Patient Specific Functional Scale (PSFS)
Time Frame: Baseline, pre-intervention and immediately after the intervention, Week 8.
A patient-reported measure of task-goal identification and difficulty performing the task on a 0-10-point ordinal scale with higher ratings indicating greater satisfaction with task performance.
Baseline, pre-intervention and immediately after the intervention, Week 8.
Stroke and Aphasia Quality of Life Scale (SAQoL)
Time Frame: Baseline, pre-intervention and immediately after the intervention, Week 8.
39-item stroke-specific measure of health-related quality of life rated by participants on a 5-point scale (1 = couldn't do it at all, 5 = no trouble at all). An overall mean score is computed as well as three domain scores: physical, communication, and psychosocial. Higher scores indicate better quality of life.
Baseline, pre-intervention and immediately after the intervention, Week 8.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patient-Specific Functional Scale (PSFS)
Time Frame: Baseline, pre-intervention and immediately after the intervention, Week 8.
Patient-reported measure of task-goal identification and difficulty performing the task on a 0-10-point ordinal scale with higher ratings indicating greater satisfaction with task performance.
Baseline, pre-intervention and immediately after the intervention, Week 8.
The Communication Participation Item Bank Short Form (CPIB-10)
Time Frame: Baseline, pre-intervention and immediately after the intervention, Week 8.
10-item questionnaire in which the participant identifies the degree to which communication-related life activities (e.g., talking with strangers, communicating in a small group, having a long conversation with a friend) are impacted by aphasia. Each item is ranked on a 4-point scale (0=very much, 3=not at all). Summed item ratings are reported so that higher scores indicate greater functional communication skills.
Baseline, pre-intervention and immediately after the intervention, Week 8.
Telerehabilitation-modified Fugl-Meyer Assessment of the Upper Extremity (tmFMA-UE)
Time Frame: Baseline, pre-intervention and immediately after the intervention, Week 8.
15-item scale of arm/hand movements rated by the therapist (0=no motion, 2=normal). Summed item ratings are reported so that higher values indicate greater movement ability.
Baseline, pre-intervention and immediately after the intervention, Week 8.
Performance Quality Rating Scale (PQRS)
Time Frame: Baseline, pre-intervention and immediately after the intervention, Week 8.
The OT observes live performance (via the telerehabilitation video call) of one of the tasks not chosen on the PSFS. The subject's performance is rated by the OT on a 0-10-point ordinal scale with higher ratings indicating greater task performance skill.
Baseline, pre-intervention and immediately after the intervention, Week 8.
Revised Western Aphasia Battery (WAB-R)
Time Frame: Baseline, pre-intervention and immediately after the intervention, Week 8.
32-item test of linguistic and non-linguistic skills across 8 subscales. Its score is used to classify the type and severity of aphasia disorder and gives clinically valid data documenting treatment effect.
Baseline, pre-intervention and immediately after the intervention, Week 8.
Stroke Self Efficacy Questionnaire (SSEQ)
Time Frame: Baseline, pre-intervention and immediately after the intervention, Week 8.
13-item patient self-report of their confidence (0-10-point Likert scale with higher numbers indicating greater confidence) doing at-home tasks such as using both hands to eat food or prepare a meal for oneself.
Baseline, pre-intervention and immediately after the intervention, Week 8.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Lisa McTeague, PhD, Medical University of South Carolina
  • Principal Investigator: Michelle Woodbury, PhD, Medical University of South Carolina
  • Principal Investigator: Deena Blackett, PhD, University of Central Florida

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 1, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 13, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 16, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

January 17, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 18, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 16, 2026

Last Verified

June 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe