Comparison of Color Measurements of Postgraduate Dental Students Using Different Color Determination Methods (Color)

January 28, 2025 updated by: Kemal Işıklı, Hacettepe University

Comparison of Color Measurements of Postgraduate Dental Students in the Maxillary Anterior Region Using Different Color Determination Methods

This study evaluates the accuracy of tooth color identification skills in the anterior region using a new technique, the button technique, in comparison with other methods.

Study Overview

Status

Enrolling by invitation

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The human eye is effective in detecting subtle differences in tooth color. However, variations in the shade, translucency, opacity, and characterization of a tooth may not be accurately identified. Visual color matching is subject to physiological variables that may lead to inconsistencies, such as age, gender, experience, the type of scale used, varying degrees of light exposure, eye fatigue, and color vision deficiency.

Studies comparing visual and instrumental methods have demonstrated that spectrophotometers yield better results compared to visual color scales. Therefore, it is expected that color measurement devices improve the accuracy of tooth color determination, thereby enhancing the interpretation and aesthetic execution of restorations.

In recent years, the button technique has been described for shade selection in direct aesthetic restorations in the anterior region. In this technique, small composite samples in the form of dots are polymerized on the tooth surface using a curing light. Digital photographs are then taken, and appropriate enamel and dentin shades are selected on a computer using polarized and black-and-white images.

Very few clinical studies have investigated the use of digital color images obtained through intraoral digital scanners for shade selection, comparing them with other existing methods.

The aim of this study is to evaluate the accuracy of shade determination skills in the anterior region by comparing a new technique, the button technique, with other methods and to recommend the most suitable method for shade selection

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

32

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ankara
      • Altındağ, Ankara, Turkey, 06230
        • Hacettepe University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Being healthy individuals, not having any systemic diseases, being young individuals (18-40 age range)

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Being healthy individuals,
  • Not having any systemic diseases,
  • Being young individuals (18-40 age range)
  • Vital, decay-free and healthy upper central teeth,
  • Absence of caries-free hard tissue abrasions, any restoration, fracture, crack, intrinsic or extrinsic discoloration in the upper central teeth
  • Lack of removable prosthesis feet for central teeth

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Tetracycline, fluorosis staining of upper central teeth
  • Patients with dentin exposure or loss of bine in the upper central teeth for any reason
  • Pregnant and lactating patients will not be included.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
To have compared the inter-observer reliability of 4 different methods used in tooth color selection
Time Frame: 1 month
To have compared the inter-observer reliability of 4 different methods used in tooth color selection
1 month

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 27, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

March 1, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

March 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 19, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 19, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 28, 2025

Last Verified

January 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Tooth Discoloration

Clinical Trials on Resins, Composite

Subscribe