Evaluation of the Efficacy of MACitentan in the Treatment of CoronaryMICrovascular Angina (MACMIC)

February 1, 2025 updated by: Jingang Zheng, China-Japan Friendship Hospital

Evaluation of the Efficacy of MACitentan in the Treatment of CoronaryMICrovascular Angina: a Pilot Study

Coronary microvascular angina (MVA) significantly reduces quality of life and increases the risk of heart problems in patients with angina. Unfortunately, there are no effective treatments available yet. The endothelin-1 (ET-1) - endothelin receptor (ETRs) system plays a critical role in MVA. Preclinical studies demonstrate that ETRs antagonists or pericyte-specific knockdown of ETRs can improve coronary microvascular function in myocardial ischemia/reperfusion mice and diabetic mice. Foreign clinical drug trials have shown that ETRs antagonists may alleviate patients' symptoms. However, these studies predominantly rely on conventional coronary angiography rather than direct assessment of coronary microvascular function. Early experimental trials using ETRs antagonists reported a high incidence of side effects, such as sodium retention and headaches, which negatively impacted treatment satisfaction.

To address these limitations, a pilot study is proposed to evaluate the efficacy of macitentan in MVA treatment. This investigation will implement thermodilution-based coronary microcirculation function testing to precisely characterize the severity and subtype of coronary microvascular lesions in MVA patients. By administering macitentan - a safer ETRs antagonist - the study aims to systematically assess improvements in coronary microvascular function, angina symptom relief, and adverse event incidence. The findings are expected to provide critical evidence regarding the therapeutic potential and safety profile of macitentan, while establishing foundational data for subsequent large-scale clinical trials.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

30

Phase

  • Early Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

  • Name: Yanxiang Gao, Study Principal Investigator
  • Phone Number: +86 13811020048
  • Email: gaoyx1980@163.com

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Beijing
      • Beijing, Beijing, China, 100000
        • Recruiting
        • China-Japan Friendship Hospital
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 18-75 years old.
  • With typical angina symptoms.
  • Excluding obstructive coronary lesions (coronary stenosis ≤50% or FFR ≥0.8) by CAG.
  • Coronary microcirculatory function CFR<2.5 and/or IMR>25 assessed by temperature dilution method.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant or lactating women.
  • History of heart attack within the last 90 days.
  • Severe heart disease (e.g., moderate to severe heart failure, severe heart valve disease).
  • Severe renal impairment (GFR <30 ml/min/1.73m2).
  • Severe liver disease (Child-Pugh class C).
  • Moderately severe anaemia (haemoglobin concentration <90 g/L).
  • Participation in another drug intervention trial study within the last 90 days.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Taking Macitentan Group
After the patient signed an informed consent form, Macitentan was given as an oral medication (10 mg once daily) for a period of 4 weeks

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline to Week 4 in the Coronary Microcirculatory Function Indices Assessed by CFR and IMR
Time Frame: the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 2 weeks; 4-week follow-up

Coronary microcirculatory function indices include Coronary Flow Reserve (CFR) and Index of Microcirculatory Resistance (IMR)

  1. Coronary Flow Reserve (CFR): A unitless ratio quantifying maximal coronary blood flow augmentation capacity, measured via thermodilution as the ratio of hyperemic to resting coronary flow. The commonly used cut-off value is 2.0 or 2.5. Increased ratio indicates improved microvascular dilation capacity
  2. Index of Microcirculatory Resistance (IMR): A pressure-derived metric (units: mmHg·s) assessing microvascular resistance using thermodilution, calculated as distal coronary pressure multiplied by mean transit time during maximal hyperemia. The commonly used cut-off value is 25. Decreased value indicates reduced microvascular resistance
the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 2 weeks; 4-week follow-up

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Score of the Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ)
Time Frame: the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 2 weeks; 4-week follow-up; 8-week follow-up
The Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) is a 19-item instrument designed to assess the impact of angina on patients' daily lives across five domains: physical limitation, angina stability, angina frequency, treatment satisfaction, and disease perception. Each item is scored on a 0-100 scale, where higher scores indicate fewer symptoms and better quality of life.
the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 2 weeks; 4-week follow-up; 8-week follow-up
Change in Angina Symptoms Assessed by Angina Diary
Time Frame: the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 2 weeks; 4-week follow-up; 8-week follow-up
The angina diary is a structured log where patients record angina episodes, including their frequency, severity, duration, and possible triggers. Symptom severity is classified using a 4-level grading system similar to the Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) angina.
the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 2 weeks; 4-week follow-up; 8-week follow-up
Change in the Score of 6-minute Walking Distance (6MWD)
Time Frame: the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 2 weeks; 4-week follow-up; 8-week follow-up
The 6MWD test evaluates functional exercise capacity by measuring the total distance a patient can walk on a flat surface in 6 minutes. The test reflects cardiovascular fitness and symptom severity.
the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 2 weeks; 4-week follow-up; 8-week follow-up
Incidence of rehospitalisation for angina or heart failure.
Time Frame: 4-week follow-up; 8-week follow-up
4-week follow-up; 8-week follow-up

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Safety Outcome
Time Frame: 8-week follow-up
Occurrence of all adverse events such as hydrosodium storage, anaemia, headache and hypotension et al.
8-week follow-up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

October 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

October 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 22, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 1, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 1, 2025

Last Verified

January 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe