Evaluation of the Safety and Performance of the TriOSS®: A Prospective Observational Study in Dental Area (TriOSSD01)

June 17, 2026 updated by: Bioceramed
This study aims to collect real-world clinical data to gather information on the performance and safety of the TriOSS® when used according to its intended purpose and current clinical applications. The results of the clinical study will serve as clinical evidence for the device's clinical evaluation, targeting submission to the new Medical Device Regulation (EU) 2017/745.

Study Overview

Status

Active, not recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

TriOSS® is an implantable synthetic calcium phosphate ceramic bone substitute, composed of beta-tricalcium phosphate. The structures composed of this calcium phosphate ceramic material are rapidly osseointegrated due to its chemical composition, which is similar to the mineral phase of the human bone, and due to the interconnected porosity allowing a total vascularization of the implant. Since beta-tricalcium phosphate is more soluble than hydroxyapatite, this material composition enhances and accelerates the bone regeneration process in case of fracture or bone loss. TriOSS® is constituted by the following components: β-tricalcium phosphate, apyrogenic water, dispersing agent, polyurethane foam, and polyvinyl pyrrolidone but most of them don't have a direct contact with the patient.

TriOSS® is gamma sterilized, implantable medical device intended to be use in filling bony voids or gaps of the skeletal system (such as the sinus and alveolar ridge) that are not intrinsic to the stability of the bony structure. These defects may be surgically created defects or osseous defects created from traumatic injury to the bone in adults.

TriOSS® holds CE marking since 2016 and according to rule 8 of Annex VIII of the European Regulation n°2017/745, this product is a class III medical device.

This observational post-market study will collect data relating to standard practice procedures, therefore there are no additional risks or direct benefits associated with participating in this registry for the patient.

This study based on observations of clinical practice aims to collect clinical data to keep up to date the information on the performance and safety of the medical device when used in accordance with its intended use and current clinical applications. The results of the clinical study shall be used as clinical evidence for clinical evaluation of the device aiming submission to the new Medical Device Regulation (EU) 2017/745.

The post-market study is meant to identify and analyse emerging risks, ensure the continued acceptability of the benefit/risk ratio and also identify possible systematic misuse or unauthorized use of the medical device. This protocol does not include any planned new uses, new populations, new materials or design changes.

The results from the prospective observational post-market study will provide an evidence base for assessing the device's performance and safety after its market launch. Detecting real discrepancies in clinical performance between of the medical device early on can offer valuable opportunities to improve device design. This complements the data collected during the pre-market phases, thus improving patient selection. Active surveillance of the safety of medical devices, achieved through the continuous monitoring of vast sources of clinical data, is a priority in the field of medical devices, a requirement of MDR regulation No. 2017/745. This approach is crucial to achieving the objectives set, guaranteeing the safety and efficacy of the devices in circulation.

Patients will be followed as per local standard medical practices of the centre for 2 years.

Clinical data will be collected at 4 points in time: Visit 1 (moment after surgery - baseline and enrolment), Visit 2 (6 months ±3 weeks), Visit 3 (12 months ±30 days) and Visit 4 (23 months ±30 days).

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

80

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Lisbon District
      • Caparica, Lisbon District, Portugal, 2825-084
        • Egas Moniz School of Health and Science

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

The study population consists of adult patients undergoing reconstructive dental surgeries.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult males or females (age > 18 years old);
  • Patients undergoing reconstructive dental surgeries who meet predefined criteria in Instructions For Use (IFU) of TriOSS®;
  • Patients who are able to sign an informed consent form (for data collection);
  • Patients who are candidates for bone augmentation procedures in the sinus or alveolar ridge.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who are unable to understand consent and the objectives of the study;
  • Signs of local or systemic acute/ active or chronic infections;
  • Metabolic affections;
  • Severe degenerative diseases, conditions in which general bone grafting is not advisable;
  • Implementation sites that allow product migration;
  • Conditions which require structural support in the skeletal system;
  • Conditions where the implantation site is unstable and not rigidly fixated;
  • Sensibility to the implantable materials;
  • Known hypersensitivity to the implant material.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Primary Performance Endpoint
Time Frame: moment after surgery; 6 months; 12 months; 23 months.
Bone consolidation on the surgery site (discrete variable: Yes or No), assessed by X-ray images.
moment after surgery; 6 months; 12 months; 23 months.
Safety Endpoint
Time Frame: moment after surgery; 6 months; 12 months; 23 months.
The assessment of Adverse Events (AEs) and device deficiencies (DDs) at least possibly related to TriOSS® during the follow-up period of patients.
moment after surgery; 6 months; 12 months; 23 months.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Surgeon's Satisfaction survey on the medical device and Technical Success
Time Frame: Visit 1 (moment after surgery - baseline and enrolment)
Information on the surgeon's satisfaction with the device under study should be collected post-operatively through a general questionnaire. This questionnaire will capture the overall experience of the dentists with the medical device TriOSS®.
Visit 1 (moment after surgery - baseline and enrolment)
2. Quality of life measured through the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-14) Questionnaire
Time Frame: moment after surgery; 6 months; 12 months; 23 months.
QoL will be assessed during the patients' follow-up period. The final results will be categorized as often affected (if they answer 3 or 4 on at least one of the OHIP-14 questions) or little affected (0, 1 or 2 on all items).
moment after surgery; 6 months; 12 months; 23 months.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 5, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

February 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

February 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 29, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 4, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

February 7, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 18, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 17, 2026

Last Verified

February 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Bone Augmentation

Subscribe