- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06814782
Effects of Action Observation Training and Motor Imagery Delivered by Telerehabilitation in Patients with Parkinson's Disease (TeleAOTPD)
Effects of Action Observation Training and Motor Imagery Delivered by Telerehabilitation on Mobility, Posture and Brain Plasticity in Patients with Parkinson's Disease
The goal of this clinical trial is to investigate the efficacy on motor and postural tasks of Action Observation Training (AOT) and Action Observation combined with Motor Imagery (AOMI) delivered by telerehabilitation in patients with Parkinson Disease.
- The primary endpoint will be mobility measured with the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test (differences before and after telerehabilitation treatment period).
- In addition, clinical and functional measures, instrumental analysis of gait and posture, and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) correlates will be assessed.
Participants will be asked to undergo 24 telerehabilitation sessions, cadenced 3 per week, over an 8-week period. In the two experimental groups (AOT and AOMI), each telerehabilitation session will encompass 4 motor tasks, each containing the observation of a video clip immediately followed by the patient's execution or imagination of the same exercises. Patients in the control group will be instructed to perform the same exercises after watching videos showing landscapes
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
The project is a a single center randomised controlled trial and aims to investigate the efficacy of Action Observation Training (AOT) and Action Observation with Motor Imagery (AOMI) delivered via telerehabilitation for improving motor and postural functions in patients with Parkinson's Disease (PD). Additionally, the study seeks to explore the cortical plasticity induced by AOMI using neuroimaging techniques. The primary outcome measure will be the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test, evaluating changes in mobility before and after the 8-week telerehabilitation intervention. Secondary outcomes include clinical and functional assessments, gait and gait initiation analysis and posture analysis. For gait and gait initiation analysis and posture analysis a sex and age matched healthy subjects cohort will be included. It will be also assessed postural motor resonance in AOT group and control group during action observation at all time point and results compared to sex and age match healthy cohort. Finally last 15 recruited patients of AOMI and control group will undergo fMRI investigation.
The study will enroll 60 PD patients, each meeting specific criteria. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of three groups: 1) AOT, 2) AOMI, or 3) a control group. The intervention will consist of 24 telerehabilitation sessions over 8 weeks (3 sessions per week). Each AOT and AOMI session will include four motor tasks, where patients will watch 3-minute video clips, followed by either performing (AOT) or imagining (AOMI) the exercise for 1 minute. Each task will be repeated twice, resulting in a 32-minute session. Exercises will focus on gait and balance, commonly used in PD rehabilitation. The control group will perform similar exercises after watching videos of neutral content, such as landscapes.
Assessments will be conducted by blinded evaluators at three time points: baseline (T0), immediately after the intervention period (T8W), and three months post-intervention (T5M).
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Roberto Gatti
- Phone Number: 0282245610
- Email: roberto.gatti@hunimed.eu
Study Locations
-
-
Milan
-
Rozzano, Milan, Italy, 20089
- Istituto Clinico Humanitas
-
Contact:
- Roberto Gatti
- Phone Number: 0282245610
- Email: roberto.gatti@hunimed.eu
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Child
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- diagnosis of clinically definite PD according to the Movement Disorders Society criteria
- Hoehn and Yahr scale <4
- Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA ≥ 26
- a stable medication regimen for at least 4 weeks.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Systemic, psychiatric, or other neurological illnesses influencing motor or functional performance
- a history of substance abuse influencing cognition or compliance
- visual disturbances
- head tremor
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Action Observation Training Group (AOT)
Patients in this group will be exposed to four video presentations showing movements with different degrees of focal vs. postural components.
The patients will imitate immediately after watching.
|
Action Observation Training (AOT) consists of patients observing videos of specific movements, followed by practice of those movements
Other Names:
|
|
Experimental: Action Observation and Motor Imagery Group (AOMI)
Patients in this group will be exposed to four video presentations showing movements with different degrees of focal vs. postural components.
The patients will mentally rehearse what they saw in the videos immediately after watching.
|
Action Observation and Motor Imagery (AOMI) consists of patients observing videos of specific movements, followed by mental rehearsal of those movements
Other Names:
|
|
Active Comparator: Control group
Patients in this group will be exposed to four video presentations showing landscape.
Patients will perform the same exercise of AOT groupimmediately after watching.
|
After watching a landscape video, patients will have to perform specific postural and balance exercises
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Timed Up and Go test
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 8 weeks
|
Patients will be instructed to stand up from a chair, walk 3 meters, turn, and return to sit down.
The time taken to complete the task will be recorded.
|
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 8 weeks
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Timed Up and Go test
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of follow-up at 3 months after end of training
|
Patients will be instructed to stand up from a chair, walk 3 meters, turn, and return to sit down.
The time taken to complete the task will be recorded.
|
From enrollment to the end of follow-up at 3 months after end of training
|
|
Timed Up and Go test
Time Frame: From end of training to the end of follow-up at 3 months after end of training
|
Patients will be instructed to stand up from a chair, walk 3 meters, turn, and return to sit down.
The time taken to complete the task will be recorded.
|
From end of training to the end of follow-up at 3 months after end of training
|
|
Movement Disorders Society Unified PD Rating Scale
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 8 weeks
|
It's a scale that invenstigates behavioural, motor and functional status of PD patients.
The scale is divided in 4 parts and higher score represents worsebehavioural, motor and functional status.
|
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 8 weeks
|
|
Movement Disorders Society Unified PD Rating Scale
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end follow-up (3 months after end of training)
|
It's a scale that invenstigates behavioural, motor and functional status of PD patients.
The scale is divided in 4 parts and higher score represents worsebehavioural, motor and functional status.
|
From enrollment to the end follow-up (3 months after end of training)
|
|
Movement Disorders Society Unified PD Rating Scale
Time Frame: From end of training to the end follow-up (3 months after end of training)
|
It's a scale that invenstigates behavioural, motor and functional status of PD patients.
The scale is divided in 4 parts and higher score represents worsebehavioural, motor and functional status.
|
From end of training to the end follow-up (3 months after end of training)
|
|
Functional Independence Measure (FIM)
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 8 weeks
|
Functional Independence Measure quantifies autonomy during daily activities
|
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 8 weeks
|
|
Functional Independence Measure (FIM)
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end follow-up (3 months after end of training)
|
Functional Independence Measure quantifies autonomy during daily activities
|
From enrollment to the end follow-up (3 months after end of training)
|
|
Functional Independence Measure (FIM)
Time Frame: From end of treatment to the end of follow-up (3 months after end of treatment)
|
Functional Independence Measure quantifies autonomy during daily activities
|
From end of treatment to the end of follow-up (3 months after end of treatment)
|
|
Parkinson's disease Questionnaire - 39 items (PDQ-39)
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 8 weeks
|
Parkinson's disease Questionnaire - 39 items (PDQ-39) investigates quality of life in PD patients.
|
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 8 weeks
|
|
Parkinson's disease Questionnaire - 39 items (PDQ-39)
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end follow-up (3 months after end of treatment)
|
Parkinson's disease Questionnaire - 39 items (PDQ-39) investigates quality of life in PD patients.
|
From enrollment to the end follow-up (3 months after end of treatment)
|
|
Parkinson's disease Questionnaire - 39 items (PDQ-39)
Time Frame: From end of treatment to the end of follow-up (3 months after end of treatment)
|
Parkinson's disease Questionnaire - 39 items (PDQ-39) investigates quality of life in PD patients.
|
From end of treatment to the end of follow-up (3 months after end of treatment)
|
|
Mini-BEST Test
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 8 weeks
|
Mini-BEST Test investigates dynamic balance control.
|
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 8 weeks
|
|
Mini-BEST Test
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end follow-up (3 months after end of treatment)
|
Mini-BEST Test investigates dynamic balance control.
|
From enrollment to the end follow-up (3 months after end of treatment)
|
|
Mini-BEST Test
Time Frame: From end of treatment to the end of follow-up (3 months after end of treatment)
|
Mini-BEST Test investigates dynamic balance control.
|
From end of treatment to the end of follow-up (3 months after end of treatment)
|
|
10-Meter Walking test
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 8 weeks
|
10-Meter Walking test investigates spontaneous and maximum walking speed.
|
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 8 weeks
|
|
10-Meter Walking test
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end follow-up (3 months after end of treatment)
|
10-Meter Walking test investigates spontaneous and maximum walking speed.
|
From enrollment to the end follow-up (3 months after end of treatment)
|
|
10-Meter Walking test
Time Frame: From end of treatment to the end of follow-up (3 months after end of treatment)
|
10-Meter Walking test investigates spontaneous and maximum walking speed.
|
From end of treatment to the end of follow-up (3 months after end of treatment)
|
|
6-Minute Walking test
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 8 weeks
|
6-Minute Walking test investigates walking endurance.
|
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 8 weeks
|
|
6-Minute Walking test
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end follow-up (3 months after end of treatment)
|
6-Minute Walking test investigates walking endurance.
|
From enrollment to the end follow-up (3 months after end of treatment)
|
|
6-Minute Walking test
Time Frame: From end of treatment to the end of follow-up (3 months after end of treatment)
|
6-Minute Walking test investigates walking endurance.
|
From end of treatment to the end of follow-up (3 months after end of treatment)
|
|
Freezing of Gait Questionnaire
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 8 weeks
|
Freezing of Gait Questionnaire investigates freezing of gait episodes during daily life
|
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 8 weeks
|
|
Freezing of Gait Questionnaire
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end follow-up (3 months after end of treatment)
|
Freezing of Gait Questionnaire investigates freezing of gait episodes during daily life
|
From enrollment to the end follow-up (3 months after end of treatment)
|
|
Freezing of Gait Questionnaire
Time Frame: From end of treatment to the end follow-up (3 months after end of treatment)
|
Freezing of Gait Questionnaire investigates freezing of gait episodes during daily life
|
From end of treatment to the end follow-up (3 months after end of treatment)
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Gait and gait initiation analysis
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 8 weeks
|
Gait and gait initiation analysis measure the kinematic parameters of gait and the Anticipatory Postural Adjustments
|
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 8 weeks
|
|
Gait and gait initiation analysis
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end follow-up (3 months after end of treatment)
|
Gait and gait initiation analysis measure the kinematic parameters of gait and the Anticipatory Postural Adjustments
|
From enrollment to the end follow-up (3 months after end of treatment)
|
|
Posture analysis
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 8 weeks
|
Change of postural motor resonance of the mirror neuron system during Action Observation through H-reflex assessment
|
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 8 weeks
|
|
Posture analysis
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end follow-up (3 months after end of treatment)
|
Change of postural motor resonance of the mirror neuron system during Action Observation through H-reflex assessment
|
From enrollment to the end follow-up (3 months after end of treatment)
|
|
Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 8 weeks
|
fMRI investigates brain plasticity and functional reorganization
|
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 8 weeks
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Estimated)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- CLF24/01
- PRIN: 2022FABKJ5_2 (Other Grant/Funding Number: PNRR - Next Generation EU)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.