- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06827925
Telemedicine Wounds (Staging)
February 10, 2025 updated by: Asia University
Exploring the Effectiveness of Flipped Education in Distance Digital Learning for Long-term Care Nurses on Pressure Injury Staging Interpretation
This study aims to explore the effectiveness of the flipped education model applied to distance digital learning in enhancing the pressure injury staging interpretation skills of long-term care nursing staff.
A quasi-experimental design was employed, dividing participants into a flipped education group and a conventional digital learning group.
Pre- and post-intervention assessments were conducted to evaluate knowledge and skills, and differences in satisfaction and cognitive load were compared.
Study Overview
Status
Not yet recruiting
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Estimated)
112
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Contact
- Name: Chao Wen-Yi Chao, PhD
- Phone Number: +886 932934340
- Email: wenyichao@asia.edu.tw
Study Locations
-
-
-
Taichung, Taiwan, 413305
- Asia University
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Home care worker
- Those who have access to a smartphone and the Internet
- After the purpose of the study was explained, they agreed to participate in the study and signed the consent form.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Business managers or administrative managers who do not actually provide frontline care at the patient's home.
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Prevention
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
No Intervention: routine
Not receiving Distance Digital Learning of Flipped Education
|
|
|
Active Comparator: Distance Digital Learning
|
receiving Distance Digital Learning of Flipped Education
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Pressure injury staging interpretation test
Time Frame: One month before intervention, and one month after intervention
|
The scale consists of 21 questions and the assessment takes approximately 10 to 12 minutes.
A correct answer will earn 1 point, and an incorrect answer will earn 0 points.
The total score ranges from 0 to 21, and the calculation method is {(number of correct answers/21 questions)*100%} as the test score, rounded to the first decimal place.
Higher scores represent better knowledge of the degree of crush injury interpretation.
|
One month before intervention, and one month after intervention
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Satisfaction with teaching mode
Time Frame: One month before intervention, and one month after intervention
|
It is a structured questionnaire with 10 questions in total, focusing on teaching objectives, teaching content design, multimedia design, and self-conscious learning outcomes.
The ratings were given on a five-point Likert scale, ranging from 5 (very satisfied), 3 (no opinion), to 1 (very dissatisfied).
The total score ranges from 10 to 50, with higher scores indicating greater satisfaction with the educational strategy for pressure injury care and management.
|
One month before intervention, and one month after intervention
|
|
Cognitive load of learning
Time Frame: One month before intervention, and one month after intervention
|
The cognitive load scale assesses the subjective feelings of the subjects during the learning process and can be divided into two subscales: external cognitive load and augmentative cognitive load.
The questionnaire consists of 5 questions, using a five-point Likert scale ranging from "strongly agree" (1 point) to "strongly disagree" (5 points).
Total scores range from 5 to 25, with higher extrinsic cognitive load scores indicating lower cognitive load and lower accretive cognitive load scores indicating higher accretive cognitive load.
|
One month before intervention, and one month after intervention
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Collaborators
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Estimated)
April 1, 2025
Primary Completion (Estimated)
December 31, 2025
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 31, 2025
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
January 13, 2025
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
February 10, 2025
First Posted (Actual)
March 25, 2025
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
March 25, 2025
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
February 10, 2025
Last Verified
January 1, 2025
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- WYMeiYu2025
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.