Telemedicine Wounds (Staging)

February 10, 2025 updated by: Asia University

Exploring the Effectiveness of Flipped Education in Distance Digital Learning for Long-term Care Nurses on Pressure Injury Staging Interpretation

This study aims to explore the effectiveness of the flipped education model applied to distance digital learning in enhancing the pressure injury staging interpretation skills of long-term care nursing staff. A quasi-experimental design was employed, dividing participants into a flipped education group and a conventional digital learning group. Pre- and post-intervention assessments were conducted to evaluate knowledge and skills, and differences in satisfaction and cognitive load were compared.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

112

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Taichung, Taiwan, 413305
        • Asia University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Home care worker
  • Those who have access to a smartphone and the Internet
  • After the purpose of the study was explained, they agreed to participate in the study and signed the consent form.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Business managers or administrative managers who do not actually provide frontline care at the patient's home.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: routine
Not receiving Distance Digital Learning of Flipped Education
Active Comparator: Distance Digital Learning
receiving Distance Digital Learning of Flipped Education

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pressure injury staging interpretation test
Time Frame: One month before intervention, and one month after intervention
The scale consists of 21 questions and the assessment takes approximately 10 to 12 minutes. A correct answer will earn 1 point, and an incorrect answer will earn 0 points. The total score ranges from 0 to 21, and the calculation method is {(number of correct answers/21 questions)*100%} as the test score, rounded to the first decimal place. Higher scores represent better knowledge of the degree of crush injury interpretation.
One month before intervention, and one month after intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Satisfaction with teaching mode
Time Frame: One month before intervention, and one month after intervention
It is a structured questionnaire with 10 questions in total, focusing on teaching objectives, teaching content design, multimedia design, and self-conscious learning outcomes. The ratings were given on a five-point Likert scale, ranging from 5 (very satisfied), 3 (no opinion), to 1 (very dissatisfied). The total score ranges from 10 to 50, with higher scores indicating greater satisfaction with the educational strategy for pressure injury care and management.
One month before intervention, and one month after intervention
Cognitive load of learning
Time Frame: One month before intervention, and one month after intervention
The cognitive load scale assesses the subjective feelings of the subjects during the learning process and can be divided into two subscales: external cognitive load and augmentative cognitive load. The questionnaire consists of 5 questions, using a five-point Likert scale ranging from "strongly agree" (1 point) to "strongly disagree" (5 points). Total scores range from 5 to 25, with higher extrinsic cognitive load scores indicating lower cognitive load and lower accretive cognitive load scores indicating higher accretive cognitive load.
One month before intervention, and one month after intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

April 1, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 13, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 10, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 10, 2025

Last Verified

January 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe