- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06869434
Thoraco Lumbar Vertebral Length and Bupivacaine Dosage in C-Section (bupivacaine)
In Cesarean Sections, is the Length of the Thoracolumbar Vertebral Column Applicable for Determining the Dosage of Bupivacaine in Spinal Anesthesia?
Our hypothesis is that the bupivacaine dose determined according to the thoracolumbar vertebral body length (VBL) is more effective in achieving a lower hypotension rate during spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery than the dose usually adjusted based on height and weight. The VBL measurements were determined from the midpoint of C7 to the tuffier line L4 spinous process.
Method: Patients ranging in height from 150 to 170 were randomly assigned to either Group 1 (0.2 mg of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine per cm VBL or Group 2 (height-adjusted dose of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine based on a minimum dose of 0.065 mg/cm according to height) or Group 3 (height-adjusted dose of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine based on a minimum height-adjusted dose of 0.065 mg/cm).
Study Overview
Status
Intervention / Treatment
- Procedure: Group VBL (Thoracolumbal vertebral body length) received 0.2 mg x VBL cm of %0.5 hyperbaric bupivacaine
- Procedure: Group FD (fixed dose) received a volume of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine based on a dose calculated according to the patient's height 0.065 mg/cm
- Procedure: Group AD (adjusted dosage) got intrathecal heavy bupivacaine (0.5%) tailored to the patient's height and weight.
Detailed Description
The study followed a parallel study strategy. Patients provided informed permission before the procedure. The study was randomly assigned and blinded. The study was conducted from April 2025 to December 2025. Patients with pre-existing or pregnancy-induced hypertension, cardiovascular or cerebrovascular disease, contraindications to spinal anesthesia, weighing < 50 kg or > 110 kg, and heights higher than 170 cm or shorter than 150 cm were eliminated. Informed written consent was acquired from all patients participating in the trial. Each patient was evaluated for vital parameters and possible complications at 3-minute intervals before and after the spinal anesthesia application, treated if necessary, and recorded. The study was concluded at the end of the cesarean section.
There was no premeditation among the patients. The patient had standard monitoring, including non-invasive blood pressure, ECG, and pulse oximetry, with recorded baseline blood pressure and heart rate measurements. We inserted two 20-gauge intravenous cannulas and administered an IV-balanced solution using these routes. The patients' age, height, weight, ASA class, and VBL (C7-L4 Tuffier line cm) were recorded. The Tuffier's line (TL), which is made by drawing a horizontal line across the tops of the iliac crests, is the most common anatomical landmark right now. It has been shown to match up with the L4-L5 interspace or the L4 spinous process.
After skin infiltration with 2% lidocaine, a 25-gauge short-bevel Quincke spinal needle was placed at the L3-4 vertebral interspace with the patient in a sitting position. After aspiration of cerebrospinal fluid, the following anesthetic solutions were delivered over 5 seconds. Randomization was used to divide the patients into three groups. The trial was double-blind, with the patient and assessor unconscious of their group allocation. Only the practitioner delivering the spinal anesthesia was aware of the group allocation. Systolic, diastolic, and mean arterial blood pressure and heart rate were documented at baseline and assessed at 3-minute intervals, commencing 3 minutes post-spinal injection and persisting until the initiation of surgical procedures, after which measurements were conducted at 3-minute intervals.
Patients in Group VBL (Vertebral Body Length) received 0.2 mg x VBL cm of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine. In contrast, Group FD (fixed dose) received a 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine volume based on a dose calculated according to the patient's height of 0.065 mg/cm. Group AD (adjusted dosage) got intrathecal heavy bupivacaine (0.5%) tailored to the patient's height and weight. A dosage was derived using Harten's dose chart formulated for Caucasian parturients
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Melikgazi
-
Kayseri, Melikgazi, Turkey (Türkiye), 38050
- Kudret Doğru
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Class II
- Having regular antenatal visits
- Singleton pregnancy at ≥37 weeks of gestation
- Pregnant women aged 18-45 -
Exclusion Criteria:
- Those with eclampsia, those with preeclampsia
- Undergoing an emergency cesarean section
- Those with bleeding diathesis and those receiving anticoagulant therapy
- With a history of carotid artery stenosis,
- Cardiovascular disease,
- Hypertension,
- Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease,
- Heart rhythm outside of sinus
- Patients with a history of cerebrovascular disease
- Alcoholism or psychiatric illness
- Placenta previa, accreta, and percreta
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Prevention
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Group VBL (Vertebral body length) received 0.2 mg x VBL cm of %0.5 hyperbaric bupivacaine,
Patients in Group VBL (Vertebral body length) received 0.2 mg x VBL cm of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine
|
intrathecal heavy bupivacaine (0.5%) tailored to the patient's height and weight.
A dosage was derived using Harten's dose chart formulated for Caucasian parturients
Other Names:
|
|
Active Comparator: Group FD (fixed dose) received a volume of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine based on a dose calculated ac
Group FD (fixed dose) received a volume of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine based on a dose calculated according to the patient's height 0.065 mg/cm
|
Group FD (fixed dose) received a volume of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine based on a dose calculated according to the patient's height 0.065 mg/cm
|
|
Active Comparator: Group AD (adjusted dosage) got intrathecal heavy bupivacaine (0.5%) tailored to the patient's height
Group AD (adjusted dosage) got intrathecal heavy bupivacaine (0.5%) tailored to the patient's height and weight
|
Group AD (adjusted dosage) got intrathecal heavy bupivacaine (0.5%) tailored to the patient's height and weight.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Hypotension Rate Among the Groups
Time Frame: From initiation of spinal anesthesia to completion of surgery, during the intraoperative period (mean duration approximately 60-90 minutes)
|
Maternal hypotension was defined as a decrease in systolic blood pressure of more than 20% from baseline or a systolic blood pressure <90 mmHg.
The incidence of hypotension was recorded intraoperatively for each participant.
|
From initiation of spinal anesthesia to completion of surgery, during the intraoperative period (mean duration approximately 60-90 minutes)
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Study Director: Kudret Dogru, Prof. Dr., TC Erciyes University
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Carpenter RL, Caplan RA, Brown DL, Stephenson C, Wu R. Incidence and risk factors for side effects of spinal anesthesia. Anesthesiology. 1992 Jun;76(6):906-16. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199206000-00006.
- Kinsella SM, Carvalho B, Dyer RA, Fernando R, McDonnell N, Mercier FJ, Palanisamy A, Sia ATH, Van de Velde M, Vercueil A; Consensus Statement Collaborators. International consensus statement on the management of hypotension with vasopressors during caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia. Anaesthesia. 2018 Jan;73(1):71-92. doi: 10.1111/anae.14080. Epub 2017 Nov 1. No abstract available.
- Siddiqui KM, Ali MA, Ullah H. Comparison of spinal anesthesia dosage based on height and weight versus height alone in patients undergoing elective cesarean section. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2016 Apr;69(2):143-8. doi: 10.4097/kjae.2016.69.2.143. Epub 2016 Mar 30.
- Bower JR, Kinsella SM. Preventing and treating hypotension during spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section. BJA Educ. 2020 Nov;20(11):360-361. doi: 10.1016/j.bjae.2020.08.001. Epub 2020 Sep 9. No abstract available.
Helpful Links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2025/62
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Obstetric Anesthesia Problems
-
University Clinic Dr Dragisa Misovic-DedinjeCompletedObstetric Anesthesia ProblemsSerbia
-
Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation TrustRecruitingObstetric Anesthesia ProblemsUnited Kingdom
-
Capogna GiorgioCompleted
-
Tver Regional Perinatal CenterCompletedObstetric Anesthesia Problems | High-Risk PregnancyRussian Federation
-
Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation TrustStanford UniversityCompletedQuality of Life | Anesthesia Morbidity | Obstetric Anesthesia ProblemsUnited Kingdom
-
Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals NHS TrustCompletedHypothermia | Anesthesia | Obstetric Anesthesia ProblemsUnited Kingdom
-
Hospital Civil de GuadalajaraRecruitingEffect of Subarachnoid Hyperbaric Bupivacaine in Obese Pregnant Patients Undergoing Cesarean SectionAnesthesia | Obstetric Anesthesia ProblemsMexico
-
St George's, University of LondonUnknownAwareness, Anesthesia | Obstetric Anesthesia ProblemsUnited Kingdom
-
National Taiwan University HospitalCompleted
-
Cairo UniversityCompletedObstetric Anesthesia ProblemsEgypt