Cephalic Femoral Heads Follow Up

March 13, 2025 updated by: Limacorporate S.p.a

A Post-market Study Evaluating Clinical and Safety Outcomes of Unipolar Hemiarthroplasty Using Cephalic Femoral Heads in Subjects with Hip Fracture

Study design: monocentric, retrospective, observational and post-market clinical study.

Purpose: To demonstrate the safety and performance of cephalic femoral heads. The eligible study population is represented by the entire population that underwent a hip replacement with cephalic femoral heads from 1st January 2023 onwards at the site in accordance with the indication for use of the product.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Detailed Description

The study is aiming to demoranstrate safety and performance of cephalic femoral heads and will do it by considering the rate of revision of any prosthesis component and dislocation, by x-ray evaluation, by patient reported outcomes and walking/residential status. Patients are followed for 2 years after hemiarthroplasty and data are collected at 6 timepoints (pre-operative, intra-operative, at discharge, 4-months follow up, 12 months follow up and 24 months follow up).

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

47

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Presov, Slovakia, 5898
        • University Hospital J.A. Reimana
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients who underwent partial hip arthroplasty with cephalic femoral heads from 1st January 2023 onwards

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Displaced intracapsular hip fracture (Garden III-IV).
  • Subjects underwent a Unipolar Hemiarthroplasty with a Cephalic femoral head as per their Indication For Use from January 1st, 2023, onwards.
  • No concurrent joint disease at the time of the surgery.
  • Absence of severe cognitive dysfunction demonstrated by 3 or more correct answers on the Pfeiffer test.
  • Ability to ambulate independently with or without walking aids before surgery.
  • Subject willingness to participate.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Undisplaced or minimally displaced intracapsular hip fracture (Garden I-II).
  • Any Cephalic femoral head contraindication for use as reported in the current Instruction For Use.
  • Pathological fracture secondary to malignant disease.
  • Subjects with rheumatoid arthritis or symptomatic osteoarthritis.
  • Previous treatment to the same hip for a fracture at the time of the surgery.
  • Subjects who were deemed unsuitable for the surgical procedures by the anesthesiologist.
  • Severe cognitive dysfunction or cognitive impairment demonstrated by 2 or less correct answers on the Pfeiffer test.
  • Unable to walk before surgery (e.g., wheelchair or bed-ridden subjects).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Patients who underwent hip arthroplasty with cephalic femoral heads from 1at January 2023 onwards.
The study population for this clinical investigation includes subjects who suffered from a traumatic proximal femur fracture and underwent a Unipolar hemiarthroplasty with Cephalic femoral head from January 1st, 2023, onwards. Due to the characteristics of patients who underwent this type of surgery, it is expected that a considerable number of eligible patients would be in the elderly age.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Evaluation of the revision rate of Cephalic femoral heads for any reason at 24 months after Unipolar Hemiarthroplasty.
Time Frame: From intraoperative to 24months follow up visit
From intraoperative to 24months follow up visit

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Evaluation of the dislocation rate (including close reduction) in subjects with Cephalic femoral heads from intra-operative to 24 months after Unipolar Hemiarthroplasty.
Time Frame: From intraoperative to 24months follow up visit
From intraoperative to 24months follow up visit
Evaluation of the revision incidence of any hip component for any reason from intra-operative to 24 months after Unipolar Hemiarthroplasty.
Time Frame: From intraoperative to 24months follow up visit
From intraoperative to 24months follow up visit
Evaluation of acetabular erosion (according to Baker classification) in subjects with Cephalic femoral heads at 12 months after Unipolar Hemiarthroplasty.
Time Frame: 12 months follow up visit
Baker classification is graded from 0 to 3, where 3 is the worst case. Grade 0: no erosion Grade 1: narrowing the arthicular cartilage, no erosion Grade 2: acetabular erosion and early migration Grade 3: protrusion acetabuli
12 months follow up visit
Assessment of Harris Hip Score (HHS) at 24 months after Unipolar Hemiarthroplasty with Cephalic femoral heads.
Time Frame: 24 months follow up visit
The Harris Hip Score goes from 0 to 100, which is the best result.
24 months follow up visit
Assessment of Oxford Hip Score (OHS) completed by subjects with Cephalic femoral heads at 24 months after Unipolar Hemiarthroplasty.
Time Frame: 24 months follow up visit
The Oxford Hip Score goes from 0 to 48, with 48 being the best outcome
24 months follow up visit
Assessment of Pain Likert-scale in subjects with Cephalic femoral heads at 24 months after Unipolar Hemiarthroplasty.
Time Frame: 24 months follow up visit

The pain Likert-scale is a 6-point scale:

  • severe and spontaneous
  • severe when walking
  • tollerable
  • occurs after activity
  • light intermittent
  • no pain
24 months follow up visit
Comparison between pre-operative and 4-month walking ability.
Time Frame: Performed at preoperative visit to 4months follow up visit
Functional evaluation
Performed at preoperative visit to 4months follow up visit
Comparison between pre-operative and 4-month residential status.
Time Frame: Performed at preoperative visit and 4months follow up visit
Daily habit
Performed at preoperative visit and 4months follow up visit

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

October 1, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 7, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 11, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 13, 2025

Last Verified

March 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • H-45

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe