Topical Nitroglycerine for Prevention of Radial Artery Spasm

March 27, 2025 updated by: Basaraba Gabriela Lavinia, University of Medicine and Pharmacy "Victor Babes" Timisoara

Topical Nitroglycerin Pretreatment for the Prevention of Radial Arterial Spasm

In a randomized, double-blind trial, 100 patients undergoing angiography were pre-treated with either topical nitroglycerin (NTG) or placebo. Outcomes assessed included radial artery spam (RAS) incidence, radial artery puncture success, number of attempts, procedural duration, patient discomfort, and complications. RAS was evaluated angiographically and clinically, with additional subgroup analyses for diabetic and smoking patients

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

During the period of April 2023 - June 2023, 100 consecutive patients that un-derwent invasive angiography using radial artery approach (deemed suitable access site by operating physician) were enrolled and randomized to either pretreatment with a topical cream 0.2% NTG, or application of a gel that contained no active substances. Randomization was done using a computer program designed to randomly produce either the digit 1 or 0, with 1 meaning the patient was assigned to nitroglycerine cohort and 0 to placebo cohort. The assigned nurse that handled the randomization also ad-ministered the patient's treatment. The NTG or placebo cream was applied 20-40 minutes before radial artery puncture by the assigned nurse. The study was designed as a randomized, double-blinded trial, with neither the patient nor the operator aware of the treatment allocation. Patients had indication of either elective or emergency coronary artery or peripheral artery angiography, and had no contraindication to ra-dial artery approach. Both right and left radial arteries were used, depending on oper-ator judgement, while distal radial approach was not utilized in any case. The operator assessed the radial artery pulse quality by manual palpation before puncture. Standard local subcutaneous anesthesia with 5 ml of 2% lidocaine solution was performed. A visual analog scale was used to judge patient discomfort related to the puncture and puncture site at several times during the procedure, with the worst pain level being documented (scale of 0 to 10, where 0 is no pain, and 10 is worst possible pain). The key objective was assessing spasm of the radial artery, which was judged both subjectively by the operator by judging the grade of resistance felt during manipulation of the catheters, and objectively by injection of contrast dye into the radial artery through the introducer sheath immediately after it had been placed inside the radial artery. Spasm was defined as narrowing of the radial artery lumen by more than 50%. Diffuse spasm was defined as spasm of a segment of radial artery greater than 2 cm, or more than two different sites of spasm. The diameter of the radial artery was also measured on the radial angiograms, and was indexed to the patient's body surface area. After sheath insertion and radial artery measurement, the operator could administer intraarterial NTG at his discretion throughout the procedure.

Other data that was included was number of attempts that lead to successful puncture and sheath placement, procedure duration (including angioplasty if needed), contrast dye used and hospital stay duration. Patients were screened for cardiovascu-lar risk factors such as smoking, diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia, hypertension and obesity. Procedural anticoagulation was performed using 5000 units of unfractioned heparin for diagnostic procedures and 70 units/kilogram for angioplasties. At the end of the procedure, after sheath extraction, hemostasis was achieved using a compres-sive dressing that was left in place for ~12 hours. Bleeding complications at the site of puncture were noted (presence of local hematoma), and ultrasound screening at dis-charge was used to check postprocedural radial artery patency.

Radial sheaths used were 6 French, and the operator had the freedom to use any size of catheters he considered, most often choosing 6 French for both diagnostic angi-ography and percutaneous intervention. No preprocedural patient sedation was used, and cath lab temperature was similar for all cases.

Statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS Statistics version 20.0 software for Windows with a significant p<0.05. We used descriptive statistics, figures, and ta-bles to summarize our findings. Results for targeted variables were presented using descriptive statistics (mean, standard deviation, range, median, and associated inter-quartile range) for continuous data, and counts with associated percentages for cate-gorical data. Independent samples t-test was used to analyze differences in means for continuous variables, while differences between categorical variables were examined by Chi-squared test. Categorical data are presented as counts (percentages).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

100

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Timis
      • Timisoara, Timis, Romania, 300134
        • Timisoara Institute for Cardiovascular Diseases

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • indication for invasive cardiology procedure (diagnostic or curative)
  • deemed suitable for radial access by operating physician

Exclusion Criteria:

  • refuses or unable to give consent
  • demed unsuitable for radial artery access (no radial pulse, small patient size, anticipation of complex procedure that requires alternative access site)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: nitroglycerin topic cream for radial artery spasm prevention, applied before radial artery puncture
Nitroglycerin cream is applied ~ 15 minutes before radial artery puncture for emergency or planned invasive cardiology procedure (example: coronary angiography), and radial artery spasm and diameter are determined by angiography, injecting contrast into the radial artery through the placed radial sheath.
Placebo Comparator: placebo cream administration
Placebo cream with no active compounds is applied by the designated nurse to the radial puncture site, similar to NTG cream, with both patient and invasive cardiologist blinded wo which arm the patient is included in.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Radial artery spasm as determined by angiography of radial artery; spasm being defined as >50% stenosis
Time Frame: Baseline
Baseline

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of radial artery puncture attempts
Time Frame: Baseline
Nitroglycerin cream is applied ~15 minutes before radial puncture is attempted, operator notes number of tries to successfully puncture it and place the sheath
Baseline
Crossover to alternative puncture site
Time Frame: Baseline
If radial puncture is unsuccessful another puncture site is needed, this is noted by operator as need for cross-over
Baseline
Radial artery diameter, absolute value
Time Frame: Baseline
Angiographical measurement of radial artery diameter in non-spastic area
Baseline
Patient discomfort measured using a Visual Analog Scale
Time Frame: Intraprocedural, every 15 minutes
The patient is asked throughout the procedure level of pain on a 0-10 scale, and maximum level is noted
Intraprocedural, every 15 minutes
Radial artery spasm: diffuse or localized
Time Frame: Baseline
If radial spasm is present on a segment of radial artery longer than 20mm it is noted as diffuse, if shorter then it is noted as localized
Baseline
Contrast medium used during procedure
Time Frame: At the end of invasive procedure
Total amount in milliliters l is noted
At the end of invasive procedure
Invasive procedure duration
Time Frame: at the end of invasive procedure
Total duration of procedure is noted, from puncture of artery to catheter withdrawal (coronary angiography, angioplasty, other angiographic investigation)
at the end of invasive procedure
Hospital stay duration
Time Frame: Up to 10 weeks
Total length of hospitalization is noted (in days)
Up to 10 weeks
Number of patients with radial artery patency at discharge
Time Frame: Up to 3 weeks
Radial artery patency (of punctured artery) is determined by ultrasound analysis on the day of discharge
Up to 3 weeks
Local complications at puncture site - hematoma
Time Frame: Up to 3 weeks
During hospital stay, after procedure is completed, forearm is examined for local hematoma in relation to radial artery puncture site
Up to 3 weeks
Radial artery diameter indexed to body surface area
Time Frame: Baseline
Angiographical measurement of radial artery diameter in non-spastic area indexed to patient body surface area
Baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 30, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

June 30, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 20, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 27, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

April 4, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 4, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 27, 2025

Last Verified

March 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe