Cost-Effectiveness of ESWT Plus Rehabilitation vs Rehabilitation Alone in Post-Burn Scars

March 30, 2025 updated by: Al Hayah University In Cairo

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy (ESWT) Combined With Standard Rehabilitation Versus Standard Rehabilitation Alone in Managing Post-Burn Scars: A Randomized Controlled Trial With Integrated Economic Evaluation

This randomized controlled trial (RCT) will evaluate the cost-effectiveness of combining extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) with standard rehabilitation versus standard rehabilitation alone for the management of hypertrophic post-burn scars in adults. The study will assess clinical outcomes-such as pain intensity, pruritus, and scar quality-alongside economic outcomes including cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained, direct medical costs, and indirect costs (e.g., absenteeism and reduced productivity). Results will inform health policy and resource allocation decisions for advanced burn rehabilitation interventions.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Post-burn hypertrophic scars can cause significant pain and pruritus, substantially affecting quality of life and functionality. Although ESWT has been recently associated with enhanced scar maturation and symptom reduction (Yang et al., 2022), its implementation into standard care is limited by a lack of economic evaluation. This trial is a prospective, randomized controlled study with an integrated cost-effectiveness analysis. Adult patients (aged 18-65) with hypertrophic scars at least 6 months post-burn injury will be recruited and stratified by scar severity. Participants will be randomized into one of two arms:

Arm 1 (Experimental): ESWT combined with standardized rehabilitation therapy. Arm 2 (Active Comparator): Standard rehabilitation therapy alone.

Primary clinical outcomes will include changes in pain intensity (measured on a Visual Analog Scale [VAS]), pruritus intensity (using the Itch Man Scale), and scar quality (assessed through the Vancouver Scar Scale [VSS]).

Economic outcomes will be determined by calculating the cost per QALY gained along with an assessment of both direct (therapy sessions, equipment use, hospital visits) and indirect costs (absenteeism, lost productivity).

Data will be collected at baseline and at follow-up visits at 1, 3, and 6 months post-intervention.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

104

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Cairo, Egypt, 12311
        • Recruiting
        • Faculty of Physical Therapy, Al Hayah University
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Adults aged 18-65 years. Documented hypertrophic scars following a burn injury, with scars present and stable for at least 6 months.

Moderate to severe scar severity as measured by a standardized clinical assessment.

Experiencing significant pain and/or pruritus related to the scar, with a baseline VAS score of ≥4.

Able to provide informed consent and comply with study procedures. Employed or engaged in daily activities such that indirect costs (absenteeism/reduced productivity) can be recorded.

Exclusion Criteria:

Pregnant or lactating women. Individuals with previous surgical scar revision or other invasive scar treatments within the last 6 months.

Patients with comorbid conditions (e.g., severe cardiovascular disease, uncontrolled diabetes) that could interfere with rehabilitation or ESWT.

Active skin infection in the area of the scar. Use of concurrent investigational therapies for scar management.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: ESWT Plus Standard Rehabilitation
Participants in this arm will undergo extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) in addition to receiving standard rehabilitation therapy. ESWT will be administered using a standardized protocol, with treatment sessions conducted weekly for a predetermined duration, integrated with a rehabilitation program focused on scar management, functional restoration, and symptom relief.
Participants in the experimental arm will receive a combination intervention comprising ESWT delivered by certified technicians using a validated device for post-burn scars, along with standard rehabilitation therapy. ESWT sessions will be standardized (e.g., 3,000 pulses per session, weekly for 8 weeks) and will be integrated with a comprehensive rehabilitation program encompassing physical therapy, scar management exercises, and patient education. The specific parameters (e.g., energy level, frequency) will be reported based on established guidelines.
Active Comparator: Standard Rehabilitation Alone
Participants assigned to this arm will receive the standard rehabilitation therapy protocol designed for post-burn scar management. This regimen includes physical, occupational, and scar-specific therapy sessions delivered in a standardized fashion without the addition of ESWT.
Participants in the control arm will receive the institution's standard rehabilitation therapy for managing post-burn scars, including physical therapy, occupational therapy, and scar-massage techniques. Treatment frequency and duration will mirror the experimental arm's rehabilitation component to ensure consistency. No ESWT will be provided.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain Intensity (Visual Analog Scale [VAS])
Time Frame: Assessed at baseline, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months post-intervention.
This measure evaluates the intensity of pain experienced by participants, using a 10-centimeter Visual Analog Scale where 0 indicates "no pain" and 10 indicates "worst pain imaginable." The VAS is a validated, standardized tool allowing for quantitative measurement of patient-reported pain intensity changes over time.
Assessed at baseline, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months post-intervention.
Cost per Quality-Adjusted Life Year (QALY) Gained
Time Frame: Evaluated at 6 months post-intervention.
This economic outcome will be determined by calculating the incremental cost per QALY gained using validated health-related quality-of-life instruments (eg, EQ-5D) alongside hospital billing data. It compares the cumulative costs (both direct and indirect) and QALYs between the ESWT plus rehabilitation arm versus the rehabilitation alone arm over a 6-month period.
Evaluated at 6 months post-intervention.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pruritus Intensity (Itch Man Scale)
Time Frame: Measured at baseline, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months post-intervention.
Pruritus will be quantified using the Itch Man Scale, a validated instrument designed to assess the severity and frequency of itching, which is a common symptom in post-burn scars.
Measured at baseline, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months post-intervention.
Scar Quality (Vancouver Scar Scale [VSS])
Time Frame: Assessed at baseline, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months post-intervention.
The Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS) will be employed to evaluate scar characteristics such as vascularity, pliability, height, and pigmentation. This scale is widely used for the objective assessment of burn scars.
Assessed at baseline, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months post-intervention.
Direct Medical Costs
Time Frame: Collated over the 6-month study period.
Direct medical costs include expenditures for therapy sessions, ESWT equipment usage, hospital visits, and any additional medical services related to the intervention. Data will be extracted from hospital billing records.
Collated over the 6-month study period.
Indirect Costs (Absenteeism and Reduced Productivity)
Time Frame: Evaluated cumulatively over the 6-month follow-up period.
Indirect costs will encompass lost productivity and absenteeism, as estimated through participant-reported work absenteeism and validated economic questionnaires. These costs represent the broader societal impact of treatment.
Evaluated cumulatively over the 6-month follow-up period.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

April 22, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 30, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 30, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

April 6, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 6, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 30, 2025

Last Verified

March 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • ESWT-BurnCE2025

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe