Research on the Effect of Noise Cancelling Headphones in Reducing Postoperative Pain

Research on the Effect of Noise Cancelling Headphones in Reducing Postoperative Pain During Gynecological Laparoscopic Surgery :a Randomized Controlled Trial

this randomized controlled trial selects patients undergoing gynecological laparoscopy under general anesthesia. By using noise reduction earphones during surgery, the patient's postoperative pain score and demand for opioids are observed, providing a basis and reference for the efficacy and safety of noise reduction earphones in gynecological endoscopic surgery.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Every year, 200 million surgical procedures are performed worldwide, and 40-65% of patients experience moderate to severe pain after surgery Failure to provide sufficient postoperative analgesia increases the risk of surgical complications and affects patients' early activity and recovery . Opioids are still the main method of treatment, and their side effects include urinary retention, itching, nausea, vomiting, postoperative intestinal obstruction, dizziness and cognitive impairment . Researchers pay more and more attention to non pharmacology and non-invasive analgesia methods, including music therapy, traditional Chinese medicine acupuncture and moxibustion and watching educational videos . Due to the introduction of various surgical tools, the noise pollution in the operating room has gradually intensified, affecting surgical patients and medical staff. Previous studies have shown that general anesthesia does not hinder the brain's processing ability for sound and language; The patient's auditory cortex remains active , and even in anesthesia induced coma, the patient can still maintain the ability to understand auditory information. Other recent studies have found that intraoperative exposure to positive auditory stimuli, including music, treatment suggestions and white noise, can reduce postoperative pain, environmental protection, and acupuncture and moxibustion can also have a similar positive impact . Therefore, this randomized controlled trial selects patients undergoing gynecological laparoscopy under general anesthesia. By using noise reduction earphones during surgery, the patient's postoperative pain score and demand for opioids are observed, providing a basis and reference for the efficacy and safety of noise reduction earphones in gynecological endoscopic surgery.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

300

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

  • Name: Na Li, MD
  • Phone Number: +862763490107
  • Email: lina@hbfy.com

Study Locations

    • Hubei
      • Wuhan, Hubei, China, 430000
        • Recruiting
        • Maternal and Child Health Hospital of Hubei Province,
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

ASA grade I or II, aged 18-55 years , female were selected for gynecological laparoscopy under elective general anesthesia. -

Exclusion Criteria:

History of serious illness requiring further care in the intensive care unit after surgery; Abnormal hearing; Postoperative mechanical ventilation or continued anesthesia or sedation is required; Preoperative chronic pain or long-term use of painkillers; other factors that hinder patients from cooperating with the research plan

-

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Sham Comparator: Conventional processing group,
Standard monitoring techniques ,Conventional processing without noise cancelling headphones
(3)atients were given the same anesthesia regimen. Standard monitoring techniques include electrocardiogram, pulse oximeter, heart rate and blood pressure monitoring, continuous monitoring of bispecific index of electroencephalography, and the use of remifentanil (0.3 mg/kg) Rapid sequence induction was performed using sufentanil (0.3 μ g/kg), propofol (2.5mg/kg), and rocuronium bromide (0.6 mg/kg). Anesthesia was maintained using remifentanil (0.1-0.2 μ g/0kg/min), inhaled sevoflurane (1%), and intravenous propofol (1-4 mg/kg/h) to maintain BIS 40-60, with heart rate and blood pressure within 20% of baseline values.
Experimental: wearing noise cancelling headphones group
group started wearing noise cancelling headphones until the end of the surgery in the general anesthesia induction group to isolate intraoperative environmental noise
The treatment group started wearing noise cancelling headphones until the end of the surgery in the general anesthesia induction group to isolate intraoperative environmental noise,patients were given the same anesthesia regimen. Standard monitoring techniques include electrocardiogram, pulse oximeter, heart rate and blood pressure monitoring, continuous monitoring of bispecific index of electroencephalography, and the use of remifentanil (0.3 mg/kg) Rapid sequence induction was performed using sufentanil (0.3 μ g/kg), propofol (2.5mg/kg), and rocuronium bromide (0.6 mg/kg). Anesthesia was maintained using remifentanil (0.1-0.2 μ g/0kg/min), inhaled sevoflurane (1%), and intravenous propofol (1-4 mg/kg/h) to maintain BIS 40-60, with heart rate and blood pressure within 20% of baseline values.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
pain scores
Time Frame: 6, 12, and 24 hours postoperatively
the patient's resting and exercise induced pain scores,by the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) It typically involves a 10-centimeter horizontal or vertical line, with endpoints labeled "no pain" (0) and "worst pain imaginable" (10).
6, 12, and 24 hours postoperatively
maximum pain scores
Time Frame: at 0-6 hours, 6-12 hours, and 12-24 hours postoperatively.
maximum pain scores at 0-6 hours, 6-12 hours, and 12-24 hours postoperatively.by the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) It typically involves a 10-centimeter horizontal or vertical line, with endpoints labeled "no pain" (0) and "worst pain imaginable" (10).
at 0-6 hours, 6-12 hours, and 12-24 hours postoperatively.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
maximum resting pain score
Time Frame: within 24 hours postoperatively
by the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) It typically involves a 10-centimeter horizontal or vertical line, with endpoints labeled "no pain" (0) and "worst pain imaginable" (10).
within 24 hours postoperatively
total opioid consumption
Time Frame: within 24 hours postoperatively
within 24 hours postoperatively
the number of PCIA pump buttons
Time Frame: within 24 hours postoperatively
within 24 hours postoperatively

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Na Li, MD, Maternal and Child Health Hospital of Hubei Province

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 12, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

May 12, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 12, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 28, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 6, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

April 9, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 9, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 6, 2025

Last Verified

March 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • MCHH_011

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe