The Impact of an Art and Philosophy-based Intervention on Children's Eco-anxiety

April 17, 2025 updated by: Catherine Malboeuf-Hurtubise, Bishop's University

The Impact of an Art and Philosophy-based Intervention on Children's Eco-anxiety: A Pilot Study

Objective: To examine the impact of climate change on children's mental health by comparing the effectiveness of an arts only intervention (ABI) and an arts and philosophy-based intervention (APBI) on children's eco-anxiety, tolerance to distress and hope for the future in school settings. The investigators hypothesized that the children assigned to the combined arts and philosophy intervention would show reductions in self-reported eco-anxiety, as well as increases in tolerance to distress and hope for the future in the context of climate change, when compared to children assigned to the arts-only intervention.

Setting: This study is conducted in public primary schools from England. Participants: Participants are students in grades 3 to 6. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome is self-reported eco-anxiety scores. Secondary outcomes are self-reported tolerance to distress, hope for the future and mental health (depression and anxiety symptoms).

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

1000

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Burton-on-Trent
      • Henhurst Ridge, Burton-on-Trent, United Kingdom, DE13 9TQ
        • Reach2 Academy, NorthStar Academy

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • being an elementary school student

Exclusion Criteria:

  • not being an elementary school student

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Art-based intervention (ABI)
A 8 session intervention delivered during school time. Each session involve a creative arts activity.
Experimental: Arts and philosophy intervention (APBI)
8 session intervention delivered during school time. Each session involves an art activity with a corresponding philosophical discussion.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Eco-anxiety
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 8 weeks

Self-reported child eco-anxiety

Hogg Eco-Anxiety Scale Minimum score: 0 Maximum score: 33 Higher scores mean worse outcomes

From enrollment to the end of treatment at 8 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Tolerance to distress
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 8 weeks

Self-reported child tolerance to distress

Distress Intolerance Index for Youth Minimum score: 0 Maximum score: 36 Higher scores mean worse outcomes

From enrollment to the end of treatment at 8 weeks
Hope
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 8 weeks

Self-reported child hope

1 item house scale: Thinking about climate change, how hopeful would you say you are that things will get better in the future? Minimum score: 0 Maximum score: 4 Higher score means a better outcome

From enrollment to the end of treatment at 8 weeks
Mental health
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 8 weeks

Self-reported anxiety and depression symptoms

Selected items from the anxiety and depression subscales of the Behavior Assessment System for Children-III Minimum score: 0

Maximum score anxiety: 9 Maximum score depression: 15 Higher scores mean a worse outcome

From enrollment to the end of treatment at 8 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Catherine Malboeuf-Hurtubise, PhD, Bishop's University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 3, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 11, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 17, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

April 20, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 20, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 17, 2025

Last Verified

April 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 102683

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe