- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06938139
Defining Benchmarks for Gastric Cancer Patients Underwent Minimal Invasive Gastrectomy
April 20, 2025 updated by: Chang-Ming Huang, Prof., Fujian Medical University
Defining Benchmarks for Gastric Cancer Patients Underwent Minimal Invasive Gastrectomy: A Multicentre Analysis
The Benchmark-MISGC study was a large-scale retrospective observational study launched by the China Gastric Cancer Surgical Union, aiming to establish the benchmarks of the short- and long-term outcomes for gastric cancer patients who underwent minimal invasive gastrectomy.
Study Overview
Status
Active, not recruiting
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Observational
Enrollment (Estimated)
90000
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Fujian
-
Fuzhou, Fujian, China, 350000
- Fujian Medical University Union Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Child
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Sampling Method
Non-Probability Sample
Study Population
Patients with postoperative histologically confirmed gastric adenocarcinoma at stages T1-4a, N0/+, M0 and treated with robotic or laparoscopic gastrectomies with curative intent along with lymph node dissection between January 2009 and April 2024.
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients with postoperative histologically confirmed gastric adenocarcinoma at stages T1-4a, N0/+, M0;
- underwent robotic or laparoscopic gastrectomies with curative intent
Exclusion Criteria:
- ASA class > 3;
- remnant gastric cancer;
- concurrent/previous malignant disease;
- Distant metastasis;
- Palliative resection;
- Abodominal exploration.
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Benchmark values of overall complication
Time Frame: 30 days
|
Median values of continuous variables and the proportions of categorical variables were calculated per participating centre.
Benchmark values, indicating 'best achievable' results for each outcome indicator, were set at the 25th percentile for positive parameters (for example lymph node yield) or the 75th percentile for negative parameters (for example complications) of the centers' median values.
Postoperative complications were evaluated within 30 days following surgery.
These postoperative complications include gastrointestinal-related complications, incision-related complications, respiratory complications, cardiovascular and cerebrovascular complications, urinary system complications, infection complications, embolism complications, and other complications.
The grading of postoperative complications adopts the Clavien-Dindo classification.
|
30 days
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Benchmark values of Overall survival (OS)
Time Frame: 1-year, 2-year and 3-year
|
Benchmark values of 1-year, 2-year and 3-year OS.
OS was defined as the time from surgery to death from any cause or last follow-up.
|
1-year, 2-year and 3-year
|
|
Benchmark values of Disease-specific survival (DSS)
Time Frame: 1-year, 2-year, and 3-year
|
Benchmark values of 1-year, 2-year and 3-year DSS.
DSS was defined as the time from surgery to death from gastric cancer, or last follow-up.
|
1-year, 2-year, and 3-year
|
|
benchmark value of the number of harvest lymph nodes
Time Frame: 1 month
|
the number of harvest lymph nodes
|
1 month
|
|
Benchmark values of Mortality rates
Time Frame: 30 days
|
Patient died during hospitalization.
|
30 days
|
|
Benchmark values of the incidence of intraoperative complications
Time Frame: 1 days
|
Intraoperative complications were defined as bleeding due to named vessel injury, injury to visceral organs, mechanical factor-related problems, cardiopulmonary dysfunction due to hypercapnia, and other complications
|
1 days
|
|
Benchmark values of Intraoperative blood loss
Time Frame: 1 day
|
Intraoperative blood loss
|
1 day
|
|
Benchmark values of operation time
Time Frame: 1 day
|
From skin incision to skin closure
|
1 day
|
|
Benchmark values of textbook Outcome
Time Frame: 30 days
|
Textbook outcome (TO) was defined based on review of existing TO metrics in the literature including outcomes such as complete-potentially curative status, no intraoperative complications, no eventful postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo grade III or higher), 15 lymph nodes(LNs) examined, hospital stay < 21days, no reintervention (surgical, endoscopic or radiological) within 30 days after surgery, no readmission to the intensive care unit (ICU) within 30 days after surgery, no postoperative mortality within 30 days after surgery, and no hospital readmission within 30 days after discharge.
When all nine desired health outcomes were realized, TO was achieved.
|
30 days
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
March 1, 2025
Primary Completion (Estimated)
April 30, 2025
Study Completion (Estimated)
April 30, 2025
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
March 28, 2025
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
April 20, 2025
First Posted (Actual)
April 22, 2025
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
April 22, 2025
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
April 20, 2025
Last Verified
April 1, 2025
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- Benchmark-MISGC
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
UNDECIDED
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.