Defining Benchmarks for Gastric Cancer Patients Underwent Minimal Invasive Gastrectomy

April 20, 2025 updated by: Chang-Ming Huang, Prof., Fujian Medical University

Defining Benchmarks for Gastric Cancer Patients Underwent Minimal Invasive Gastrectomy: A Multicentre Analysis

The Benchmark-MISGC study was a large-scale retrospective observational study launched by the China Gastric Cancer Surgical Union, aiming to establish the benchmarks of the short- and long-term outcomes for gastric cancer patients who underwent minimal invasive gastrectomy.

Study Overview

Status

Active, not recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

90000

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Fujian
      • Fuzhou, Fujian, China, 350000
        • Fujian Medical University Union Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients with postoperative histologically confirmed gastric adenocarcinoma at stages T1-4a, N0/+, M0 and treated with robotic or laparoscopic gastrectomies with curative intent along with lymph node dissection between January 2009 and April 2024.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients with postoperative histologically confirmed gastric adenocarcinoma at stages T1-4a, N0/+, M0;
  2. underwent robotic or laparoscopic gastrectomies with curative intent

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. ASA class > 3;
  2. remnant gastric cancer;
  3. concurrent/previous malignant disease;
  4. Distant metastasis;
  5. Palliative resection;
  6. Abodominal exploration.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Benchmark values of overall complication
Time Frame: 30 days
Median values of continuous variables and the proportions of categorical variables were calculated per participating centre. Benchmark values, indicating 'best achievable' results for each outcome indicator, were set at the 25th percentile for positive parameters (for example lymph node yield) or the 75th percentile for negative parameters (for example complications) of the centers' median values. Postoperative complications were evaluated within 30 days following surgery. These postoperative complications include gastrointestinal-related complications, incision-related complications, respiratory complications, cardiovascular and cerebrovascular complications, urinary system complications, infection complications, embolism complications, and other complications. The grading of postoperative complications adopts the Clavien-Dindo classification.
30 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Benchmark values of Overall survival (OS)
Time Frame: 1-year, 2-year and 3-year
Benchmark values of 1-year, 2-year and 3-year OS. OS was defined as the time from surgery to death from any cause or last follow-up.
1-year, 2-year and 3-year
Benchmark values of Disease-specific survival (DSS)
Time Frame: 1-year, 2-year, and 3-year
Benchmark values of 1-year, 2-year and 3-year DSS. DSS was defined as the time from surgery to death from gastric cancer, or last follow-up.
1-year, 2-year, and 3-year
benchmark value of the number of harvest lymph nodes
Time Frame: 1 month
the number of harvest lymph nodes
1 month
Benchmark values of Mortality rates
Time Frame: 30 days
Patient died during hospitalization.
30 days
Benchmark values of the incidence of intraoperative complications
Time Frame: 1 days
Intraoperative complications were defined as bleeding due to named vessel injury, injury to visceral organs, mechanical factor-related problems, cardiopulmonary dysfunction due to hypercapnia, and other complications
1 days
Benchmark values of Intraoperative blood loss
Time Frame: 1 day
Intraoperative blood loss
1 day
Benchmark values of operation time
Time Frame: 1 day
From skin incision to skin closure
1 day
Benchmark values of textbook Outcome
Time Frame: 30 days
Textbook outcome (TO) was defined based on review of existing TO metrics in the literature including outcomes such as complete-potentially curative status, no intraoperative complications, no eventful postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo grade III or higher), 15 lymph nodes(LNs) examined, hospital stay < 21days, no reintervention (surgical, endoscopic or radiological) within 30 days after surgery, no readmission to the intensive care unit (ICU) within 30 days after surgery, no postoperative mortality within 30 days after surgery, and no hospital readmission within 30 days after discharge. When all nine desired health outcomes were realized, TO was achieved.
30 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 1, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

April 30, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

April 30, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 28, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 20, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

April 22, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 22, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 20, 2025

Last Verified

April 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • Benchmark-MISGC

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe